Censorship Through Explanation: The Corrective Agency of Visibility in Panoramic Perspective and the Panopticon Prison Plan

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Space and Culture Pub Date : 2022-07-06 DOI:10.1177/12063312221104192
L. Tipene
{"title":"Censorship Through Explanation: The Corrective Agency of Visibility in Panoramic Perspective and the Panopticon Prison Plan","authors":"L. Tipene","doi":"10.1177/12063312221104192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that historical parallels exist between Australian colonial image production and early-19th-century prison design in England. It compares similarities in the compositional arrangement of a panoramic perspective from the Van Diemen’s Land colonial frontier in 1835, by minor artist John Richardson Glover, and Jeremy Bentham’s 1791 plan for the Panopticon prison. Richardson Glover’s predilection for censoring the unknown environment in his drawings with rational explanations is associated with the cultivation of spectatorship since 1793 in the popular visual media of the Panorama Rotunda at Leicester Square. The influence of spectatorship is argued to parallel the instrumentality of inspection in the Panopticon plan and together reflect a social rationale that equated biblical references to universal rationalism and anoints visibility as a secular, Enlightenment mode of moral reformation. Spectatorship and inspection in panoramic perspective and the Panopticon plan are shown to operate as corrective forces to govern British imperial interests at home and abroad.","PeriodicalId":46749,"journal":{"name":"Space and Culture","volume":"25 1","pages":"379 - 397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312221104192","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay argues that historical parallels exist between Australian colonial image production and early-19th-century prison design in England. It compares similarities in the compositional arrangement of a panoramic perspective from the Van Diemen’s Land colonial frontier in 1835, by minor artist John Richardson Glover, and Jeremy Bentham’s 1791 plan for the Panopticon prison. Richardson Glover’s predilection for censoring the unknown environment in his drawings with rational explanations is associated with the cultivation of spectatorship since 1793 in the popular visual media of the Panorama Rotunda at Leicester Square. The influence of spectatorship is argued to parallel the instrumentality of inspection in the Panopticon plan and together reflect a social rationale that equated biblical references to universal rationalism and anoints visibility as a secular, Enlightenment mode of moral reformation. Spectatorship and inspection in panoramic perspective and the Panopticon plan are shown to operate as corrective forces to govern British imperial interests at home and abroad.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过解释进行审查:全景视角下可视性的矫正机构与圆形监狱计划
本文认为,澳大利亚殖民时期的形象制作与19世纪早期英国监狱设计之间存在着历史上的相似之处。它比较了小艺术家约翰·理查森·格洛弗(John Richardson Glover)于1835年从范·迪门斯土地殖民边境拍摄的全景视角和杰里米·边沁(Jeremy Bentham) 1791年为Panopticon监狱设计的平面图在构图安排上的相似性。理查德森·格洛弗(Richardson Glover)喜欢在他的绘画中用理性的解释来审查未知的环境,这与自1793年以来在莱斯特广场全景圆形大厅(Panorama Rotunda)的流行视觉媒体中对观众的培养有关。旁观者的影响被认为与圆形监狱计划中检查的工具性相平行,并共同反映了一种社会理论,这种理论将圣经中的参考等同于普遍的理性主义,并将可见性作为一种世俗的启蒙道德改革模式。全景视角下的观察和检查以及圆形监狱计划被证明是治理英国帝国在国内外利益的纠正力量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Space and Culture
Space and Culture Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Space and Culture is an interdisciplinary journal that fosters the publication of reflections on a wide range of socio-spatial arenas such as the home, the built environment, architecture, urbanism, and geopolitics. it covers Sociology, in particular, Qualitative Sociology and Contemporary Ethnography; Communications, in particular, Media Studies and the Internet; Cultural Studies; Urban Studies; Urban and human Geography; Architecture; Anthropology; and Consumer Research. Articles on the application of contemporary theoretical debates in cultural studies, discourse analysis, virtual identities, virtual citizenship, migrant and diasporic identities, and case studies are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Place Diagnosis Before Transformation: Case of Fener-Balat Elastic Neighboring: Everyday Life Within the Geometry and Materiality of Large Housing Estates Design as Playground: Exploring Spatial Design Through Playful Practices Place Branding Viewed From the Perspective of the Poetics of Space: The Case of Aesop’s Signature Stores Listening Beyond the Human: The Autonomous Recording Unit and the Ethics of Sound in Biodiversity Conservation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1