Payment versus charitable donations to attract agricultural and natural resource survey participation

Jerrod M. Penn, Wuyang Hu
{"title":"Payment versus charitable donations to attract agricultural and natural resource survey participation","authors":"Jerrod M. Penn,&nbsp;Wuyang Hu","doi":"10.1002/jaa2.72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This analysis provides two case studies comparing direct payment versus charitable donations on respondents' behalf as survey participation incentives. The first examines agricultural producers' willingness to participate in several hypothetical surveys. Donation to charity significantly increases producers' willingness to participate relative to direct payment. The second case study examines forest landowners' willingness to participate in an actual, one-time survey. Neither payment nor donation incentives improve participation among mail respondents and donations are less effective versus payment among online respondents. If they do not decrease participation, then donations may be preferred, requiring less effort to process a smaller number of transactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93789,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","volume":"2 3","pages":"461-480"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaa2.72","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaa2.72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This analysis provides two case studies comparing direct payment versus charitable donations on respondents' behalf as survey participation incentives. The first examines agricultural producers' willingness to participate in several hypothetical surveys. Donation to charity significantly increases producers' willingness to participate relative to direct payment. The second case study examines forest landowners' willingness to participate in an actual, one-time survey. Neither payment nor donation incentives improve participation among mail respondents and donations are less effective versus payment among online respondents. If they do not decrease participation, then donations may be preferred, requiring less effort to process a smaller number of transactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
吸引农业和自然资源调查参与的付款与慈善捐款
本分析提供了两个案例研究,比较直接支付与代表受访者的慈善捐赠作为调查参与激励。第一项研究考察了农业生产者参与几项假设调查的意愿。与直接支付相比,向慈善机构捐款显著提高了生产者的参与意愿。第二个案例研究考察了森林土地所有者是否愿意参加一次实际的一次性调查。无论是支付还是捐赠激励都不能提高邮件受访者的参与度,而捐赠在在线受访者中的效果也不如支付。如果他们不减少参与,那么捐赠可能是首选,需要更少的努力来处理更少的交易。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Evaluating the impact of fertilizer and crop prices on phosphorus concentrations in Great Lakes watersheds Financial access of midstream agricultural firms in Africa: Evidence from the LSMS-ISA and World Bank Enterprise Surveys Geopolitical risks and agricultural trade diversification in Southern Africa: Port-level evidence from the Russia-Ukraine war Unpacking the gender wage gap in the U.S.: The impact of rural employment, age, and occupation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1