Competitive mimicry: The socialization of antifeminist NGOs into the United Nations

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Constitutionalism Pub Date : 2022-03-03 DOI:10.1017/S2045381721000186
Jelena Cupać, Irem Ebetürk
{"title":"Competitive mimicry: The socialization of antifeminist NGOs into the United Nations","authors":"Jelena Cupać, Irem Ebetürk","doi":"10.1017/S2045381721000186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Conservative NGOs contesting women’s rights in the United Nations are on the rise, and their activity is increasingly described as an antifeminist backlash. This article focuses a new theoretical lens on this development: socialization. It argues that conservative NGOs’ socialization into transnational practices and the United Nations has played a significant part in facilitating the antifeminist backlash. To support this claim, the article examines socialization comprehensively, applying several analytical angles: its definition, directionality, mechanism, degree and effects. It also treats conservative NGOs’ socialization as both a process and an outcome. As a process, it unfolds horizontally, by conservative NGOs competitively mimicking feminist NGOs in two domains in particular: their manner of transnational organizing and their skilful use of the UN human rights framework. The article finds that conservative NGOs have socialized into transnational NGO practices and the regulative institutional rules of the United Nations, but not into all its constitutive norms. The chief effect of this kind of socialization is polarization. The article singles out and empirically illustrates three of its manifestations: the struggle for institutional spaces; zero-sum politics based on a sense of existential threat; and the use of a strong moralizing discourse.","PeriodicalId":37136,"journal":{"name":"Global Constitutionalism","volume":"11 1","pages":"379 - 400"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Constitutionalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Conservative NGOs contesting women’s rights in the United Nations are on the rise, and their activity is increasingly described as an antifeminist backlash. This article focuses a new theoretical lens on this development: socialization. It argues that conservative NGOs’ socialization into transnational practices and the United Nations has played a significant part in facilitating the antifeminist backlash. To support this claim, the article examines socialization comprehensively, applying several analytical angles: its definition, directionality, mechanism, degree and effects. It also treats conservative NGOs’ socialization as both a process and an outcome. As a process, it unfolds horizontally, by conservative NGOs competitively mimicking feminist NGOs in two domains in particular: their manner of transnational organizing and their skilful use of the UN human rights framework. The article finds that conservative NGOs have socialized into transnational NGO practices and the regulative institutional rules of the United Nations, but not into all its constitutive norms. The chief effect of this kind of socialization is polarization. The article singles out and empirically illustrates three of its manifestations: the struggle for institutional spaces; zero-sum politics based on a sense of existential threat; and the use of a strong moralizing discourse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
竞争模仿:反部长非政府组织融入联合国的社会化
摘要在联合国争夺妇女权利的保守派非政府组织正在增加,他们的活动越来越被描述为反部长主义的反弹。这篇文章将一个新的理论视角聚焦于这一发展:社会化。它认为,保守的非政府组织融入跨国实践和联合国在促进反部长主义反弹方面发挥了重要作用。为了支持这一观点,本文运用几个分析角度对社会化进行了全面的研究:社会化的定义、方向性、机制、程度和效果。它还将保守的非政府组织的社会化视为一个过程和一个结果。作为一个过程,它是横向展开的,保守的非政府组织在两个领域竞争性地模仿女权主义非政府组织:它们的跨国组织方式和它们对联合国人权框架的巧妙利用。本文认为,保守的非政府组织已经融入了跨国非政府组织的实践和联合国的规范性制度规则,但并没有融入其所有的构成规范。这种社会化的主要影响是两极分化。文章指出并实证地阐释了它的三种表现形式:对制度空间的争夺;基于生存威胁感的零和政治;以及使用强烈的道德说教话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Constitutionalism
Global Constitutionalism Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Between militant democracy and citizen vigilantism: Using citizens’ assemblies to keep parties democratic Dead or alive? Global constitutionalism and international law after the start of the war in Ukraine Between (ir)responsibility and (in)appropriateness: Conceptualizing norm-related state behaviour in the Russian war against Ukraine How do constitution-making processes fail? The case of Chile’s Constitutional Convention (2021–22) Utopian constitutionalism in Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1