Refiguring the Archive for Eras before Writing: Digital Interventions, Affordances and Research Futures

Q1 Arts and Humanities History in Africa Pub Date : 2022-05-04 DOI:10.1017/hia.2021.19
Carolyn Hamilton, Grant McNulty
{"title":"Refiguring the Archive for Eras before Writing: Digital Interventions, Affordances and Research Futures","authors":"Carolyn Hamilton, Grant McNulty","doi":"10.1017/hia.2021.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In most of Africa there are written materials from the eras before colonialism that offer a view of the kinds of ideas, cultural life, and currents of political thought, as well as practices and events, that predate substantial European engagement. In the present-day South African province of KwaZulu-Natal, and bordering provinces and countries, there are no equivalent discursive materials that predate a European presence. With colonialism, much knowledge about the remote past was stitched up in imperial and colonial knowledge systems and recording practices. In this paper, we discuss what digital interventions and affordances offer in terms of researching the history of the material used as sources for the remote past, and of releasing that material from distorting or anachronistic colonial classifications and categories. We consider the capacities and significance of digital interventions in calling out sequestered and lost materials, in convening innovative new assemblages of material, in creating conditions conducive to the restoration of neglected details of provenance, in documenting the twists and turns involved in the shaping of materials into sources, and in formally recognizing the archival potential of materials, notably the writings of early African literati, long positioned as being something other than sources and as “not-archive.”","PeriodicalId":39318,"journal":{"name":"History in Africa","volume":"49 1","pages":"131 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/hia.2021.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In most of Africa there are written materials from the eras before colonialism that offer a view of the kinds of ideas, cultural life, and currents of political thought, as well as practices and events, that predate substantial European engagement. In the present-day South African province of KwaZulu-Natal, and bordering provinces and countries, there are no equivalent discursive materials that predate a European presence. With colonialism, much knowledge about the remote past was stitched up in imperial and colonial knowledge systems and recording practices. In this paper, we discuss what digital interventions and affordances offer in terms of researching the history of the material used as sources for the remote past, and of releasing that material from distorting or anachronistic colonial classifications and categories. We consider the capacities and significance of digital interventions in calling out sequestered and lost materials, in convening innovative new assemblages of material, in creating conditions conducive to the restoration of neglected details of provenance, in documenting the twists and turns involved in the shaping of materials into sources, and in formally recognizing the archival potential of materials, notably the writings of early African literati, long positioned as being something other than sources and as “not-archive.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在写作前重新整理档案:数字干预、资助和研究未来
摘要在非洲的大部分地区,都有殖民主义之前时代的书面材料,这些材料提供了对欧洲大量参与之前的各种思想、文化生活和政治思潮以及实践和事件的看法。在今天的南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省以及与之接壤的省份和国家,在欧洲人出现之前,没有同等的话语材料。有了殖民主义,许多关于遥远过去的知识被缝合在帝国和殖民地的知识体系和记录实践中。在这篇论文中,我们讨论了数字干预和可供性在研究用作遥远过去来源的材料的历史以及从扭曲或不合时宜的殖民分类和类别中释放这些材料方面提供了什么。我们考虑到数字干预的能力和重要性,包括调出封存和丢失的材料,召集创新的新材料组合,创造有利于恢复被忽视的来源细节的条件,记录材料形成来源过程中的曲折,以及正式承认材料的档案潜力,尤其是早期非洲文人的作品,长期以来被定位为非来源和“非档案”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
History in Africa
History in Africa Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A Tapestry of Human-Induced and Climate-Driven Environmental Change in Western Uganda: The Ndali Crater Lakes Region Writing a Colonial Legal History of Northern Nigeria: An Analysis of Methods and Sources Cyber History: Homespun Historians, Ethnonationalism, and Recasting Yorùbá Oral Traditions in the Age of Social Media A Class of Their Own: Newspaper Obituaries and the Colonial Public Sphere in Lagos, 1880–1920 Wiriyamu and the Colonial Archive: Reading It Against the Grain? Along the Grain? Read It at All! – ERRATUM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1