Reducing cardiac catheterization-related anxiety: acceptability of a complex intervention

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Acta Paulista De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2023-08-09 DOI:10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0074333
L. Batista, M. D. P. Nóbrega, M. Salvetti, R. D. C. G. E. S. Butcher
{"title":"Reducing cardiac catheterization-related anxiety: acceptability of a complex intervention","authors":"L. Batista, M. D. P. Nóbrega, M. Salvetti, R. D. C. G. E. S. Butcher","doi":"10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0074333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the acceptability of people undergoing unscheduled cardiac catheterization about a complex nursing intervention (CI) to reduce anxiety.\n\nMethods: This is a qualitative and evaluative study of the acceptability of 15 participants who underwent cardiac catheterization regarding a nursing CI. Data collection was carried out in the emergency unit of a highly complex hospital in the city of São Paulo, specialized in cardiology. Participants had a diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome and received the CI, consisting of a musical and educational component, called Education and Music Intervention to Reduce Anxiety (EMIRA). Data were collected from September to October 2021, and participants underwent a semi-structured interview. The guiding questions of the interview were elaborated based on Kazdin. The interviews were recorded and transcribed for Bardin’s content analysis. To analyze EMIRA participants’ participants, Representations of Everyday Life’s theoretical contribution was used.\n\nResults: Acceptability analysis in relation to EMIRA allowed identifying three categories: EMIRA complex intervention: new experience that helps to understand cardiac catheterization; Complex EMIRA intervention: an experience that generates satisfaction; and EMIRA complex intervention: an anxiety-relieving experience. Participants reported feelings of calm, relief, tranquility, satisfaction, and recommended using EMIRA.\n\nConclusion: Participants’ experience with EMIRA was positive, suggesting good acceptability of CI by people awaiting unscheduled catheterization in the emergency unit.","PeriodicalId":6891,"journal":{"name":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Paulista De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37689/acta-ape/2023ao0074333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the acceptability of people undergoing unscheduled cardiac catheterization about a complex nursing intervention (CI) to reduce anxiety. Methods: This is a qualitative and evaluative study of the acceptability of 15 participants who underwent cardiac catheterization regarding a nursing CI. Data collection was carried out in the emergency unit of a highly complex hospital in the city of São Paulo, specialized in cardiology. Participants had a diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome and received the CI, consisting of a musical and educational component, called Education and Music Intervention to Reduce Anxiety (EMIRA). Data were collected from September to October 2021, and participants underwent a semi-structured interview. The guiding questions of the interview were elaborated based on Kazdin. The interviews were recorded and transcribed for Bardin’s content analysis. To analyze EMIRA participants’ participants, Representations of Everyday Life’s theoretical contribution was used. Results: Acceptability analysis in relation to EMIRA allowed identifying three categories: EMIRA complex intervention: new experience that helps to understand cardiac catheterization; Complex EMIRA intervention: an experience that generates satisfaction; and EMIRA complex intervention: an anxiety-relieving experience. Participants reported feelings of calm, relief, tranquility, satisfaction, and recommended using EMIRA. Conclusion: Participants’ experience with EMIRA was positive, suggesting good acceptability of CI by people awaiting unscheduled catheterization in the emergency unit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少心导管相关焦虑:复杂干预的可接受性
目的:分析非计划心导管置入术患者对复杂护理干预(CI)减轻焦虑的可接受程度。方法:这是一项定性和评估性研究,对15名接受心导管插入术的护理CI的参与者进行可接受性研究。数据收集是在圣保罗市一家高度复杂的心脏病专科医院的急诊科进行的。参与者被诊断为急性冠状动脉综合征,并接受由音乐和教育组成的CI,称为教育和音乐干预以减少焦虑(EMIRA)。数据收集于2021年9月至10月,参与者进行了半结构化访谈。在卡兹丁的基础上阐述了访谈的指导性问题。这些访谈被记录下来并转录,以供巴尔丁进行内容分析。为了分析EMIRA参与者的参与者,我们使用了日常生活表征的理论贡献。结果:与EMIRA相关的可接受性分析允许识别三类:EMIRA复杂干预:有助于理解心导管插入术的新体验;复杂EMIRA干预:产生满意度的体验;和EMIRA复杂干预:一种缓解焦虑的体验。参与者报告了平静、宽慰、宁静、满意的感觉,并推荐使用EMIRA。结论:参与者对EMIRA的体验是积极的,表明在急诊科等待非预定导尿的人对CI有很好的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Paulista de Enfermagem – (Acta Paul Enferm.), ISSN 1982-0194, is a [bilingual] technical-scientific electronic publication of the Escola Paulista de Enfermagem – EPE, Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP. Our mission: To disseminate the scientific knowledge generated within the rigor of research and ethics methodology. Our objective: To publish results of original research for advancement of practices of clinical, surgical, and management nursing, as well as education, research, and information and communication technology.
期刊最新文献
Hospitalização de idosos por COVID-19 no Paraná: uma análise de fatores associados Higiene das mãos dos profissionais de saúde: perspectivas do estudante de enfermagem no papel de paciente/familiar COVID-19 nas prisões: validação de um inquérito de conhecimento, atitude e prática Diagrama de prevenção de quedas para pessoas idosas: revisão integrativa Recusa familiar para doação de córneas para transplante: fatores associados e tendência
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1