A system of circumstantial evidence for fact-finding in criminal trial

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION Journal of Argumentation in Context Pub Date : 2021-07-05 DOI:10.1075/JAIC.20009.RI
Yong-Sok Ri, Yong-Min Kwon, Wi-Song Pang
{"title":"A system of circumstantial evidence for fact-finding in criminal trial","authors":"Yong-Sok Ri, Yong-Min Kwon, Wi-Song Pang","doi":"10.1075/JAIC.20009.RI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the most intractable, but significant problems in the theory of legal evidence concerns circumstantial\n evidence. The diversity and complexity of criminal cases cause some bottlenecks and difficulties in developing reasonable methods\n to prove the criminal issue by means of circumstantial evidence. The main purpose of this paper is to present more effective\n methods of fact-finding just by means of a system of circumstantial evidence (SCE). On the basis of analysis of the nature of\n circumstantial evidence, we find it necessary for the prosecution to construct a SCE in order to make a judge or jury accept the\n prosecution’s conclusion as the best explanation. We also present a reasonable logical structure of such a system and address some\n legal and logical problems in introducing it.","PeriodicalId":41908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Argumentation in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/JAIC.20009.RI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most intractable, but significant problems in the theory of legal evidence concerns circumstantial evidence. The diversity and complexity of criminal cases cause some bottlenecks and difficulties in developing reasonable methods to prove the criminal issue by means of circumstantial evidence. The main purpose of this paper is to present more effective methods of fact-finding just by means of a system of circumstantial evidence (SCE). On the basis of analysis of the nature of circumstantial evidence, we find it necessary for the prosecution to construct a SCE in order to make a judge or jury accept the prosecution’s conclusion as the best explanation. We also present a reasonable logical structure of such a system and address some legal and logical problems in introducing it.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在刑事审判中查明事实的间接证据体系
法律证据理论中最棘手但意义重大的问题之一涉及间接证据。刑事案件的多样性和复杂性导致了利用间接证据证明刑事问题的合理方法的发展存在一些瓶颈和困难。本文的主要目的是通过间接证据系统提出更有效的事实调查方法。在分析间接证据性质的基础上,我们发现检方有必要构建一个SCE,以使法官或陪审团接受检方的结论作为最佳解释。我们还提出了这样一个系统的合理逻辑结构,并在引入它时解决了一些法律和逻辑问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Argumentation in Context aims to publish high-quality papers about the role of argumentation in the various kinds of argumentative practices that have come into being in social life. These practices include, for instance, political, legal, medical, financial, commercial, academic, educational, problem-solving, and interpersonal communication. In all cases certain aspects of such practices will be analyzed from the perspective of argumentation theory with a view of gaining a better understanding of certain vital characteristics of these practices. This means that the journal has an empirical orientation and concentrates on real-life argumentation but is at the same time out to publish only papers that are informed by relevant insights from argumentation theory.
期刊最新文献
Tweeting fallacies The epistemological orientation of Ottoman argumentation theory and its relation to kalām Review of Wu (2023): Responding to questions at press conferences: Confrontational maneuvering by Chinese spokespersons Review of Serafis (2023): Authoritarianism on the front page: Multimodal discourse and argumentation in times of multiple crises in Greece Covid-19 and public debate over gain-of-function research on potentially pandemic pathogens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1