Recent Upsurge in Sectarianism in Pakistan : Understanding the Sunni-Shia Divide as a Case-study of Inter-Group Rivalry and the Role of Ultra-Right Parties

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS IPRI Journal Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.31945/iprij.210207
Maheen Ahmad
{"title":"Recent Upsurge in Sectarianism in Pakistan : Understanding the Sunni-Shia Divide as a Case-study of Inter-Group Rivalry and the Role of Ultra-Right Parties","authors":"Maheen Ahmad","doi":"10.31945/iprij.210207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a heightened concern in Pakistan over the rise of violent sectarianism, which has been pitting certain sections of denominational groups against each other, often assuming violent proportions. At the forefront of this renewed phase with a strong antiShia sentiment is the role of hate-spewing divisive elements, more specifically ultra-right elements that are exacerbating an exaggerated division between Sunni and Shia Muslims for their own political motives. If their momentum is sustained, then the risk is that they can further radicalize the mainstream and lodge one group against the other, putting them in a perpetual state of animosity, whereby Pakistani citizens may experience intense and implosive antagonism. This paper attempts to explain this emerging scenario in the light of theoretical frameworks of social and cognitive psychology underpinning inter-group dynamics and offers certain lessons from the erstwhile Hutu/Tutsi divide in the Rwandan Genocide of the 1990s.","PeriodicalId":41363,"journal":{"name":"IPRI Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPRI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31945/iprij.210207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a heightened concern in Pakistan over the rise of violent sectarianism, which has been pitting certain sections of denominational groups against each other, often assuming violent proportions. At the forefront of this renewed phase with a strong antiShia sentiment is the role of hate-spewing divisive elements, more specifically ultra-right elements that are exacerbating an exaggerated division between Sunni and Shia Muslims for their own political motives. If their momentum is sustained, then the risk is that they can further radicalize the mainstream and lodge one group against the other, putting them in a perpetual state of animosity, whereby Pakistani citizens may experience intense and implosive antagonism. This paper attempts to explain this emerging scenario in the light of theoretical frameworks of social and cognitive psychology underpinning inter-group dynamics and offers certain lessons from the erstwhile Hutu/Tutsi divide in the Rwandan Genocide of the 1990s.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最近巴基斯坦宗派主义的高涨:理解逊尼派和什叶派的分裂,作为团体间竞争和极右翼政党作用的案例研究
巴基斯坦对暴力宗派主义的兴起更加担忧,这种宗派主义使教派团体的某些部分相互对立,往往具有暴力的程度。在这一具有强烈反什叶派情绪的新阶段的最前沿,是煽动仇恨的分裂分子的作用,更具体地说,是极右翼分子,他们出于自己的政治动机,加剧了逊尼派和什叶派穆斯林之间的过度分裂。如果他们的势头持续下去,那么他们就有可能进一步激进化主流,让一个群体与另一个群体对立,使他们永远处于敌对状态,巴基斯坦公民可能会经历激烈的内爆对抗。本文试图根据支撑群体间动态的社会和认知心理学理论框架来解释这一新兴场景,并从20世纪90年代卢旺达种族灭绝中的胡图族/图西族分裂中提供一些教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IPRI Journal
IPRI Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Economic Coercion as a Geopolitical Strategy: From Sanction Regimes to FATF Rethinking Regional Security Paradigm: Non-Traditional Security Threats and the Role of Regional Dialogue in South Asia Socio-Political Impact of International Monetary Fund (IMF) on Pakistan from 2008-2022 India and the New Great Game in Central Asia Prevention of Faith-Based Violence as a Response to ‘Blasphemy’ in Pakistan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1