Model calibration of a long-span concrete cable-stayed bridge based on structural health monitoring data: Influence of concrete variability

Pub Date : 2022-09-28 DOI:10.3233/brs-220195
Cortney Natalicchio, H. Al-Khateeb, M. Chajes, Z. Wu, Harry W. Shenton III
{"title":"Model calibration of a long-span concrete cable-stayed bridge based on structural health monitoring data: Influence of concrete variability","authors":"Cortney Natalicchio, H. Al-Khateeb, M. Chajes, Z. Wu, Harry W. Shenton III","doi":"10.3233/brs-220195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems, in combination with controlled load tests, can provide valuable data for calibrating high fidelity bridge models, which can then be used for evaluating the long-term performance of the bridge, improved load ratings, and permit vehicle evaluation. The objective of this research was to calibrate a 3D model of the Indian River Inlet (IRIB) cable-stayed bridge, using strains recorded by the bridge SHM system during a controlled load test. The bridge was modeled in STAAD-Pro and calibrated using a pre-commercialized software platform that uses a Generic Algorithm to minimize the error between the measured and predicted strains. The calibration parameters were the elastic modulus of groups of the main longitudinal edge girder/deck elements, which once calibrated, could be related to the measured concrete strength of the members. Four different models were investigated, using 6, 10, 14, and 18 parameter element groups of the edge girder members. Of the different models, the 14 and 18 parameter models yielded the best results. The “design” model yielded errors as high as 42% when compared to the measured strains; the error was less than 10% for the majority of measurements for the 14-parameter model. Including the effect of the traffic barriers in the model, the weighted average concrete strength of the calibrated model was within 4% of the measured weighted strength. The calibration was shown to be insensitive to measurement noise and was validated using several unique single and multi-vehicle load cases that were heavier and more offset from the centerline of the bridge. The calibration procedure was able to capture the variability in flexural stiffness of the edge girders due to the variability of the concrete, resulting in significantly better agreement between the live load measured strains and the model predicted strains.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/brs-220195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems, in combination with controlled load tests, can provide valuable data for calibrating high fidelity bridge models, which can then be used for evaluating the long-term performance of the bridge, improved load ratings, and permit vehicle evaluation. The objective of this research was to calibrate a 3D model of the Indian River Inlet (IRIB) cable-stayed bridge, using strains recorded by the bridge SHM system during a controlled load test. The bridge was modeled in STAAD-Pro and calibrated using a pre-commercialized software platform that uses a Generic Algorithm to minimize the error between the measured and predicted strains. The calibration parameters were the elastic modulus of groups of the main longitudinal edge girder/deck elements, which once calibrated, could be related to the measured concrete strength of the members. Four different models were investigated, using 6, 10, 14, and 18 parameter element groups of the edge girder members. Of the different models, the 14 and 18 parameter models yielded the best results. The “design” model yielded errors as high as 42% when compared to the measured strains; the error was less than 10% for the majority of measurements for the 14-parameter model. Including the effect of the traffic barriers in the model, the weighted average concrete strength of the calibrated model was within 4% of the measured weighted strength. The calibration was shown to be insensitive to measurement noise and was validated using several unique single and multi-vehicle load cases that were heavier and more offset from the centerline of the bridge. The calibration procedure was able to capture the variability in flexural stiffness of the edge girders due to the variability of the concrete, resulting in significantly better agreement between the live load measured strains and the model predicted strains.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
基于结构健康监测数据的大跨度混凝土斜拉桥模型标定:混凝土变异性的影响
结构健康监测(SHM)系统与控制荷载试验相结合,可以为校准高保真度桥梁模型提供有价值的数据,然后可用于评估桥梁的长期性能,提高荷载等级,并允许车辆评估。本研究的目的是校准印度河入口斜拉桥(IRIB)的三维模型,使用桥梁SHM系统在控制荷载试验期间记录的应变。该桥在STAAD-Pro中建模,并使用预商业化软件平台进行校准,该软件平台使用通用算法来最小化测量和预测应变之间的误差。校正参数为主纵边梁/甲板单元组的弹性模量,校正后可与构件的实测混凝土强度相关联。采用6、10、14和18个边梁构件参数单元组,研究了4种不同的模型。在不同的模型中,14和18参数模型的效果最好。与实测应变相比,“设计”模型产生的误差高达42%;对于14参数模型的大多数测量,误差小于10%。考虑模型中交通障碍的影响,校正模型的混凝土加权平均强度与实测加权强度的误差在4%以内。结果表明,该校准对测量噪声不敏感,并通过几个独特的单车和多车负载情况进行了验证,这些情况更重,更偏离桥梁中心线。校准程序能够捕捉到由于混凝土的可变性而导致的边缘梁抗弯刚度的可变性,从而在活载测量应变和模型预测应变之间显着更好地达成一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1