Ricœur face la mort: L’attitude agnostique et ses ramifications dans l’œuvre posthume de Vivant jusqu’à la mort

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION Estudos de Religiao Pub Date : 2021-06-16 DOI:10.15603/2176-1078/ER.V35N1P5-28
Tomoaki Yamada
{"title":"Ricœur face la mort: L’attitude agnostique et ses ramifications dans l’œuvre posthume de Vivant jusqu’à la mort","authors":"Tomoaki Yamada","doi":"10.15603/2176-1078/ER.V35N1P5-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the second archive document, “Death”, from Living Up To Death, two lines of thought on the imaginary of survival are particularly developed. One explores the concept of perfect detachment, which can bring the “work of mourning” to fruition without giving in to the imaginary of the dead that survival usually expresses. Ricoeur misses this path until the emphasis is placed on a transfer of the love of life to others. The transmission of life then passes through the “written record”, left as testimony to others – the survivors – of one having been. The second line is that of imperfect detachment. Ricoeur then insisted on “God’s memory”, through the expression “God, remember me”, expressed in the eternal present of the concern for God. A reformulation in the future – “God will remember me” – would introduce the risk of a form of hypocrisy by imaginary projection, or of an inauthentic “consolation”. The “memory of God” remains the schematization of the eternal present of concern for the divine. It justifies human existence by grace. These two lines of imagining survival – the perfect and imperfect detachments would be an example of the putting into practice of an agnostic attitude in Ricoeur’s philosophy. In order to light them, this research seeks to compare the influence of Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne’s Process Theology in later ricoeurian thoughts.","PeriodicalId":41867,"journal":{"name":"Estudos de Religiao","volume":"35 1","pages":"5-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos de Religiao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15603/2176-1078/ER.V35N1P5-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the second archive document, “Death”, from Living Up To Death, two lines of thought on the imaginary of survival are particularly developed. One explores the concept of perfect detachment, which can bring the “work of mourning” to fruition without giving in to the imaginary of the dead that survival usually expresses. Ricoeur misses this path until the emphasis is placed on a transfer of the love of life to others. The transmission of life then passes through the “written record”, left as testimony to others – the survivors – of one having been. The second line is that of imperfect detachment. Ricoeur then insisted on “God’s memory”, through the expression “God, remember me”, expressed in the eternal present of the concern for God. A reformulation in the future – “God will remember me” – would introduce the risk of a form of hypocrisy by imaginary projection, or of an inauthentic “consolation”. The “memory of God” remains the schematization of the eternal present of concern for the divine. It justifies human existence by grace. These two lines of imagining survival – the perfect and imperfect detachments would be an example of the putting into practice of an agnostic attitude in Ricoeur’s philosophy. In order to light them, this research seeks to compare the influence of Whitehead and Charles Hartshorne’s Process Theology in later ricoeurian thoughts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合唱面对死亡:不可知论的态度及其对死后作品的影响
在第二份档案文件"死亡"中,从活到死,特别发展了两条关于生存想象的思想路线。一个是探索完美超然的概念,它可以使“哀悼的工作”结出果实,而不屈服于生存通常表达的对死者的想象。Ricoeur错过了这条路,直到他把重点放在将对生命的爱转移到他人身上。然后,生命的传播通过“书面记录”,作为对其他人(幸存者)的证词。第二行是不完美的超然。利科接着坚持“上帝的记忆”,通过表达“上帝,请记住我”,表达了对上帝永恒存在的关注。未来的重新表述——“上帝会记住我的”——将带来一种通过想象投射的虚伪形式,或一种不真实的“安慰”的风险。“对上帝的记忆”仍然是对神性的永恒关注的模式化。它通过恩典证明了人类存在的正当性。这两条想象生存的线——完美的和不完美的分离——将是一个例子,把利科尔哲学中不可知论的态度付诸实践。为了阐明这些问题,本研究试图比较怀特黑德和查尔斯·哈茨霍恩的过程神学对后世理科思想的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Momentos do processo de secularização da educação no Brasil: da fusão à cisão Territorialidade e representação neopentecostais: quando política e religião se entrecruzam Uma crítica de Alves no espírito de Rubem: uma análise da relação entre melancolia e religião Diversidade religiosa e o cuidado terapêutico nos grupos psicológicos na cidade de Goiana-PE Secularismo e Populismo Religioso em Portugal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1