Perioperative Family Updates Reduce Anxiety and Improve Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews Pub Date : 2021-04-19 DOI:10.17294/2330-0698.1805
Lindsay S Howe, Dan Wigmore, Nathaniel J. Nelms, P. Schottel, C. Bartlett, D. Halsey, M. Krag, David J. Lunardini, R. Monsey, B. Beynnon, M. Blankstein
{"title":"Perioperative Family Updates Reduce Anxiety and Improve Satisfaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Lindsay S Howe, Dan Wigmore, Nathaniel J. Nelms, P. Schottel, C. Bartlett, D. Halsey, M. Krag, David J. Lunardini, R. Monsey, B. Beynnon, M. Blankstein","doi":"10.17294/2330-0698.1805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nThis study aimed to determine if standardized updates at specific perioperative events affect anxiety and satisfaction of the family members and if the length of surgical procedure affects the satisfaction with updates.\n\n\nMethods\nThis study was a randomized control trial. In the control group, surgeons communicated with the family only once near the completion of the procedure. In the intervention group, families received electronic updates at 3 significant perioperative events during the procedure. A postoperative survey rating family member satisfaction and anxiety levels, using a Likert scale of 0-5, was administered.\n\n\nResults\nMean level of overall satisfaction did not differ between groups (intervention: 4.68 ± 0.69 [95% CI: 4.50, 4.87]; control: 4.61 ± 0.78 [95% CI: 4.40, 4.82]; P=0.69). Mean anxiety levels were lower in the intervention group (2.48 ± 1.43 [2.10, 2.86]) than in the control group (3.12 ± 1.32 [2.77, 3.47]; P=0.01). Mean satisfaction with perioperative updates was higher in the intervention (4.48 ± 0.83 [4.26, 4.70]) versus control group (3.16 ± 1.89 [2.67, 3.65]; P=0.0001). For all subjects, there was positive correlation between procedure time and anxiety (Spearman's rho: 0.34; P=0.0002) and negative correlation between procedure time and overall satisfaction (Spearman's rho: -0.23; P=0.01).\n\n\nConclusions\nAnxiety and satisfaction with perioperative updates were significantly improved by additional perioperative updates. These findings indicate that updating families during significant standardized strategic perioperative events can reduce the anxiety of loved ones and are preferred by most families.","PeriodicalId":16724,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","volume":"8 2 1","pages":"107-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17294/2330-0698.1805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to determine if standardized updates at specific perioperative events affect anxiety and satisfaction of the family members and if the length of surgical procedure affects the satisfaction with updates. Methods This study was a randomized control trial. In the control group, surgeons communicated with the family only once near the completion of the procedure. In the intervention group, families received electronic updates at 3 significant perioperative events during the procedure. A postoperative survey rating family member satisfaction and anxiety levels, using a Likert scale of 0-5, was administered. Results Mean level of overall satisfaction did not differ between groups (intervention: 4.68 ± 0.69 [95% CI: 4.50, 4.87]; control: 4.61 ± 0.78 [95% CI: 4.40, 4.82]; P=0.69). Mean anxiety levels were lower in the intervention group (2.48 ± 1.43 [2.10, 2.86]) than in the control group (3.12 ± 1.32 [2.77, 3.47]; P=0.01). Mean satisfaction with perioperative updates was higher in the intervention (4.48 ± 0.83 [4.26, 4.70]) versus control group (3.16 ± 1.89 [2.67, 3.65]; P=0.0001). For all subjects, there was positive correlation between procedure time and anxiety (Spearman's rho: 0.34; P=0.0002) and negative correlation between procedure time and overall satisfaction (Spearman's rho: -0.23; P=0.01). Conclusions Anxiety and satisfaction with perioperative updates were significantly improved by additional perioperative updates. These findings indicate that updating families during significant standardized strategic perioperative events can reduce the anxiety of loved ones and are preferred by most families.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围手术期家庭更新减少焦虑并提高满意度:一项随机对照试验。
目的本研究旨在确定特定围手术期事件的标准化更新是否会影响家庭成员的焦虑和满意度,以及手术时间是否会影响更新的满意度。方法采用随机对照试验。在对照组中,外科医生在手术接近完成时只与家人交流过一次。在干预组中,家庭在手术期间收到了3个重要围手术期事件的电子更新。采用Likert量表0-5对家庭成员的满意度和焦虑程度进行了术后调查。结果各组的平均总体满意度无差异(干预组:4.68±0.69[95%CI:4.50,4.87];对照组:4.61±0.78[95%CI=4.40,4.82];P=0.069)。干预组的平均焦虑水平(2.48±1.43[2.10,2.86])低于对照组(3.12±1.32[2.77,3.47];P=0.01)(4.48±0.83[4.26,4.70])与对照组(3.16±1.89[2.67,3.65];P=0.0001),手术时间与焦虑呈正相关(Spearman’s rho:0.34;P=0.0002),手术时间与总体满意度呈负相关(Speerman’s rho:0.23;P=0.001)。这些发现表明,在重要的标准化策略围手术期事件中更新家庭信息可以减少亲人的焦虑,是大多数家庭的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
"It Is What It Is" - The Lived Experience of Women With Breast Cancer Undergoing Axillary Lymph Node Dissection. "Ups and Downs, Joys and Sorrows" - Assessment and Clinical Relevance of Patient Priorities in an Interdisciplinary Parkinson's Disease Clinic. Assessing the Climate Readiness of Physician Education Leaders in Graduate Medical Education. Determining the Prognostic Value of Complete Blood Count Subgroup Parameters in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Factors Influencing Self-Wound Care Adoption in Singaporean Communities: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1