{"title":"Screening of bone cements loaded with antituberculosis drugs: preparation and determination of physical properties","authors":"Hucheng Yuan, Mao Wenxin, Qian Wang, Zili Wang, Jiancun Lei, Q. Liang, Guangwei Sun, Xuehua Ma, Zhen Liu, Xiaoming Zhang, Jianghua Du","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-9030.2019.12.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\r\nTo explore the physical properties of bone cements loaded with atituberculosis drugs.\r\n\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nWe mixed ten drugs with four bone cements by 1.5 g∶40.0 g and 2.5 g∶40.0 g, 400 modules of 80 groups were maded according to the ISO. The control group mixed bone cements with their liquid monomer, 20 modules of 4 groups were maded. The physical properties were measured respectively.\r\n\r\n\r\nResults\r\nGroup 1.5 g and 2.5 g of E, Z, S, C, A, M mixed with Palacos R, Palacos MV, Simplex P, the average dough time, solidification time, maximum temperature and mechanical strength were all meet ISO, and hardened in 20 minutes after mixing. Group 1.5 g and 2.5 g of R, H, Rt, and P mixed with the bone cements above, the average dough time, solidification time were all >ISO, the average maximum temperature was 0.05) between the four kinds of bone cements. The flexural strength and flexural modulus (P<0.01) were different. The physical properties of Palacos R and Simplex P bone cements meet ISO. The flexural strength and flexural modulus of CEMEX XL bone cement were<ISO, and Palacos MV bone cement flexural modulus <ISO.\r\n\r\n\r\nConclusion\r\n(1) Antituberculosis drugs Z, E, S, C, M, and A were suitable for preparing bone cements. (2) Antituberculosis drugs R, H, Rt, and P were not suitable for preparing bone cements. (3) CEMEX XL were not suitable for drug loading.\r\n\r\n\r\nKey words: \r\nAntituberculosis drugs; Bone cement; Screening; Physical property","PeriodicalId":10065,"journal":{"name":"中华实验外科杂志","volume":"36 1","pages":"2260-2263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华实验外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1001-9030.2019.12.041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To explore the physical properties of bone cements loaded with atituberculosis drugs.
Methods
We mixed ten drugs with four bone cements by 1.5 g∶40.0 g and 2.5 g∶40.0 g, 400 modules of 80 groups were maded according to the ISO. The control group mixed bone cements with their liquid monomer, 20 modules of 4 groups were maded. The physical properties were measured respectively.
Results
Group 1.5 g and 2.5 g of E, Z, S, C, A, M mixed with Palacos R, Palacos MV, Simplex P, the average dough time, solidification time, maximum temperature and mechanical strength were all meet ISO, and hardened in 20 minutes after mixing. Group 1.5 g and 2.5 g of R, H, Rt, and P mixed with the bone cements above, the average dough time, solidification time were all >ISO, the average maximum temperature was 0.05) between the four kinds of bone cements. The flexural strength and flexural modulus (P<0.01) were different. The physical properties of Palacos R and Simplex P bone cements meet ISO. The flexural strength and flexural modulus of CEMEX XL bone cement were