The Impact of Video Conference on Orthopaedic Resident Education: A Survey

Michael Booth, Michael J. Niemann, Andréa B. Lese, John P Taras
{"title":"The Impact of Video Conference on Orthopaedic Resident Education: A Survey","authors":"Michael Booth, Michael J. Niemann, Andréa B. Lese, John P Taras","doi":"10.31986/issn.2578.3343_vol4iss1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Covid and required social distancing has accelerated the use of video conferencing. We hypothesized that residents and faculty would be less receptive to the video lecture format and prefer traditional didactic methods.\n\nMethods: A 16-question anonymous survey was distributed nationally to orthopaedic residents and faculty. The survey collected basic demographic information such as, level in training, gender, and age. We then asked the respondent to rate their agreement or disagreement with 8 statements on a Likert scale (1-5) about video conferencing regarding orthopedic education. Likert scale responses were evaluated using basic descriptive statistics. Respondents were divided into groups of faculty and residents. Residents were subdivided into junior residents (PGY-1s and PGY-2s) and senior residents (PGY-3s, PGY-4s, and PGY-5s). A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the Likert scale type questions and a Fisher’s exact test was used for the pros/cons questions to evaluate for a difference in responses between groups.\n\nResults: A total of 123 residents or faculty responded to the survey. One was excluded because only the demographics section was completed, leaving 122 respondents. Respondents were found to prefer the traditional didactics compared to the new virtual format (p\n\nConclusions: Orthopaedic residents and faculty do not prefer the new virtual didactic format compared to the traditional approach.\n\nLevel of Evidence: Level IV Cross-Sectional Study","PeriodicalId":92771,"journal":{"name":"Cooper Rowan medical journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cooper Rowan medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31986/issn.2578.3343_vol4iss1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Covid and required social distancing has accelerated the use of video conferencing. We hypothesized that residents and faculty would be less receptive to the video lecture format and prefer traditional didactic methods. Methods: A 16-question anonymous survey was distributed nationally to orthopaedic residents and faculty. The survey collected basic demographic information such as, level in training, gender, and age. We then asked the respondent to rate their agreement or disagreement with 8 statements on a Likert scale (1-5) about video conferencing regarding orthopedic education. Likert scale responses were evaluated using basic descriptive statistics. Respondents were divided into groups of faculty and residents. Residents were subdivided into junior residents (PGY-1s and PGY-2s) and senior residents (PGY-3s, PGY-4s, and PGY-5s). A Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for the Likert scale type questions and a Fisher’s exact test was used for the pros/cons questions to evaluate for a difference in responses between groups. Results: A total of 123 residents or faculty responded to the survey. One was excluded because only the demographics section was completed, leaving 122 respondents. Respondents were found to prefer the traditional didactics compared to the new virtual format (p Conclusions: Orthopaedic residents and faculty do not prefer the new virtual didactic format compared to the traditional approach. Level of Evidence: Level IV Cross-Sectional Study
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视频会议对骨科住院医师教育的影响:一项调查
背景:Covid和要求的社交距离加速了视频会议的使用。我们假设住院医师和教师不太容易接受视频授课形式,而更喜欢传统的教学方法。方法:对全国骨科住院医师和教师进行16个问题的匿名调查。该调查收集了基本的人口统计信息,如培训水平、性别和年龄。然后,我们要求受访者在李克特量表(1-5)上对8项关于骨科教育视频会议的陈述进行同意或不同意的评分。李克特量表反应采用基本描述性统计进行评估。受访者被分为教师组和住院医生组。住院医师被细分为初级住院医师(pgy -1和pgy -2)和老年住院医师(pgy -3、pgy -4和pgy -5)。对李克特量表类型的问题采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,对赞成/反对问题采用Fisher精确检验来评估组间反应的差异。结果:共有123名住院医师或教师参与了调查。一个被排除在外,因为只有人口统计部分完成,剩下122名受访者。与新的虚拟教学方式相比,受访者更喜欢传统教学方式(结论:与传统教学方式相比,骨科住院医师和教师不喜欢新的虚拟教学方式。证据等级:IV级横断面研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding Risk Perception and Xenophobic Attitudes during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic in the United States A tale of two situations: a case report of the merger between dermatology outcomes and prescription drug access Treatment of Knee Synovitis from Psoriatic Arthritis with Platelet Rich Plasma Injection Implementation Barriers of Multidisciplinary Care in Chronic Kidney Disease Through a CFIR Framework: a Narrative Review Understanding the Acceptability and Effect of Psychiatric Care via Telemedicine as an Alternative Option for Patients Living with Intellectual Disabilities in Group Homes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1