A Comparative Study on the Analgesic Efficacy of Bilateral Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block Under Ultrasound Guidance with 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Cleft Palate Repair - A Randomized Prospective Double Blinded Study

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-01-28 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2022.36744
Arulmozhiyal Ramasamy, S. Sukumar, Prabavathi Srinivasan, Venkata Rajesh Kumar Kodali, Akilandeswari Manickam, A. Parameswari, M. Vakamudi
{"title":"A Comparative Study on the Analgesic Efficacy of Bilateral Suprazygomatic Maxillary Nerve Block Under Ultrasound Guidance with 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.25% Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Cleft Palate Repair - A Randomized Prospective Double Blinded Study","authors":"Arulmozhiyal Ramasamy, S. Sukumar, Prabavathi Srinivasan, Venkata Rajesh Kumar Kodali, Akilandeswari Manickam, A. Parameswari, M. Vakamudi","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.36744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Cleft palate repair involves surgery on the both hard and soft palate leading to severe pain, intense sympathetic stimulation, and bleeding. In our study we analysed the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in ultrasound guided bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SMN) for cleft palate repair. Methods: This study was a randomized prospective double-blinded study. Fourty six children of the ASA class I and II posted for cleft palate repair were randomized into Group A and Group B. In Group A, 23 children had SMN block with 0.15 mL kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with saline and the same procedure was repeated on other side. In Group B, 23 children received SMN block with a volume of 0.15 mL kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg kg-1 on each side. Primary outcomes analysed were pain scores in post operative period by Children and Infants Post-Operative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) and the analgesia duration. Postoperative pain scores were analysed at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours in Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and at every 2 hours interval for 24 hours in the postoperative ward. Results: Group A and B were comparable in demographic variables like age, gender, weight, ASA status, and duration of surgery. Children in Group B had significantly longer duration of analgesia when compared to that of Group A (12±4.73 hours vs 5.41± 3.9 hours) (p=0.003). Children had significantly lower pain scores in Group B at zero min in PACU (p=0.04), after 90 min (p=0.02), at 2 hours (p<0.001), 4 hours (p<0.001), 6 hours (p=0.006) and at 8 hours (p=0.02) when compared to that in Group A. Conclusion: Children who received bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in SMN block had a longer analgesia duration and lesser postoperative pain scores than children who received bupivacaine alone. Keywords: Maxillary nerve block, Dexmedetomidine, pain scores, postoperative analgesia, rescue analgesia","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.36744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cleft palate repair involves surgery on the both hard and soft palate leading to severe pain, intense sympathetic stimulation, and bleeding. In our study we analysed the analgesic efficacy of bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in ultrasound guided bilateral suprazygomatic maxillary nerve block (SMN) for cleft palate repair. Methods: This study was a randomized prospective double-blinded study. Fourty six children of the ASA class I and II posted for cleft palate repair were randomized into Group A and Group B. In Group A, 23 children had SMN block with 0.15 mL kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with saline and the same procedure was repeated on other side. In Group B, 23 children received SMN block with a volume of 0.15 mL kg-1 of 0.25% bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg kg-1 on each side. Primary outcomes analysed were pain scores in post operative period by Children and Infants Post-Operative Pain Scale (CHIPPS) and the analgesia duration. Postoperative pain scores were analysed at 30 minutes intervals for 2 hours in Post Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) and at every 2 hours interval for 24 hours in the postoperative ward. Results: Group A and B were comparable in demographic variables like age, gender, weight, ASA status, and duration of surgery. Children in Group B had significantly longer duration of analgesia when compared to that of Group A (12±4.73 hours vs 5.41± 3.9 hours) (p=0.003). Children had significantly lower pain scores in Group B at zero min in PACU (p=0.04), after 90 min (p=0.02), at 2 hours (p<0.001), 4 hours (p<0.001), 6 hours (p=0.006) and at 8 hours (p=0.02) when compared to that in Group A. Conclusion: Children who received bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in SMN block had a longer analgesia duration and lesser postoperative pain scores than children who received bupivacaine alone. Keywords: Maxillary nerve block, Dexmedetomidine, pain scores, postoperative analgesia, rescue analgesia
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0.25%布比卡因和0.25%布比卡宁联合右美托咪定超声引导下双侧奇上神经阻滞对儿童腭裂修复术镇痛效果的比较研究——一项随机前瞻性双盲研究
目的:腭裂修复包括对软硬腭进行手术,导致剧烈疼痛,强烈的交感刺激和出血。本研究分析了布比卡因单用和布比卡因联合右美托咪定在超声引导下双侧颧上颌骨神经阻滞(SMN)治疗腭裂的镇痛效果。方法:采用随机、前瞻性双盲研究。将46例ASA一级和二级腭裂修复患儿随机分为A组和b组。A组23例患儿用0.15 mL kg-1 0.25%布比卡因加生理盐水进行SMN阻滞,另一侧重复同样的程序。B组23例患儿接受SMN阻滞,体积为0.15 mL kg-1, 0.25%布比卡因,每侧右美托咪定0.5µg kg-1。分析主要结局为儿童和婴儿术后疼痛量表(CHIPPS)的术后疼痛评分和镇痛时间。术后疼痛评分在麻醉后护理病房(PACU)每隔30分钟分析2小时,在术后病房每隔2小时分析24小时。结果:A组和B组在年龄、性别、体重、ASA状态和手术时间等人口统计学变量上具有可比性。B组患儿的镇痛时间明显长于A组(12±4.73 h vs 5.41±3.9 h) (p=0.003)。与a组相比,B组患儿在PACU 0 min (p=0.04)、90 min (p=0.02)、2小时(p<0.001)、4小时(p<0.001)、6小时(p=0.006)和8小时(p=0.02)时的疼痛评分均显著低于B组。结论:在SMN阻滞中,布比卡因联合右美托咪定组患儿的镇痛持续时间更长,术后疼痛评分较单独布比卡因组低。关键词:上颌神经阻滞,右美托咪定,疼痛评分,术后镇痛,抢救镇痛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1