Ergonomic assessment of working postures for the design of university computer workstations

Nabila Chowdhury, F. Aghazadeh, Milad Amini
{"title":"Ergonomic assessment of working postures for the design of university computer workstations","authors":"Nabila Chowdhury, F. Aghazadeh, Milad Amini","doi":"10.3233/OER-170252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: There is an extensive body of research reviewing the ergonomics needs of industrial office workers. However, very few studies have considered evaluating the working postures of students or professors in universities who are exposed to prolonged sitting while working at a computer workstation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was threefold: (1) to determine the major ergonomic issues university employees encounter while working at computer workstations, (2) to compare the two ergonomic assessment tools (RULA and REBA) to see how similarly or differently they assess the risks present in the same working condition and (3) to develop a model that correlates working condition, work posture and computer workstation design with their negative effects on musculoskeletal system. METHODS: This research was constituted of a comprehensive survey (5 minutes) and a quantitative risk assessment session (20 minutes) conducted over 72 university personnel and their workstations in a university workplace. Along with a preassessment questionnaire; the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) and two ergonomic assessment tools namely Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) were used to quantify the ergonomic risk factors. To evaluate the computer workstations “OSHA Computer Workstations eTool-Evaluation Checklist” was used. RESULTS: The upper limbs of computer workstation users seem to be more prone to Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSD) and Repetitive Stress Injuries (RSI) symptoms. In 85.5% of cases, RULA scores were the same or more than that of REBA, which indicates work of office employees may cause a disorder more in the upper limbs than the lower limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment of the monitor was found to be the most significant design parameter. Among different body parts, trunk was the most affected one, as a result of poor posture and/or workplace design followed by shoulder and upper arm, and forearm and wrist.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"37-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-170252","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-170252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is an extensive body of research reviewing the ergonomics needs of industrial office workers. However, very few studies have considered evaluating the working postures of students or professors in universities who are exposed to prolonged sitting while working at a computer workstation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was threefold: (1) to determine the major ergonomic issues university employees encounter while working at computer workstations, (2) to compare the two ergonomic assessment tools (RULA and REBA) to see how similarly or differently they assess the risks present in the same working condition and (3) to develop a model that correlates working condition, work posture and computer workstation design with their negative effects on musculoskeletal system. METHODS: This research was constituted of a comprehensive survey (5 minutes) and a quantitative risk assessment session (20 minutes) conducted over 72 university personnel and their workstations in a university workplace. Along with a preassessment questionnaire; the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) and two ergonomic assessment tools namely Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) and Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) were used to quantify the ergonomic risk factors. To evaluate the computer workstations “OSHA Computer Workstations eTool-Evaluation Checklist” was used. RESULTS: The upper limbs of computer workstation users seem to be more prone to Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSD) and Repetitive Stress Injuries (RSI) symptoms. In 85.5% of cases, RULA scores were the same or more than that of REBA, which indicates work of office employees may cause a disorder more in the upper limbs than the lower limbs. CONCLUSIONS: Alignment of the monitor was found to be the most significant design parameter. Among different body parts, trunk was the most affected one, as a result of poor posture and/or workplace design followed by shoulder and upper arm, and forearm and wrist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高校计算机工作站设计中工作姿势的工效学评价
背景:有一个广泛的研究机构审查工业办公室工作人员的人体工程学需求。然而,很少有研究考虑评估在电脑工作站工作时长时间坐着的大学学生或教授的工作姿势。目的:本研究的目的有三个:(1)确定大学员工在计算机工作站工作时遇到的主要人体工程学问题;(2)比较两种人体工程学评估工具(RULA和REBA),看看它们在相同工作条件下评估风险的相似或不同程度;(3)建立一个模型,将工作条件、工作姿势和计算机工作站设计与它们对肌肉骨骼系统的负面影响联系起来。方法:本研究采用综合调查(5分钟)和定量风险评估(20分钟)的方式,对某高校工作场所72名工作人员及其工作站进行调查。还有一份预评估问卷;采用康奈尔肌肉骨骼不适问卷(CMDQ)和快速全身评估(REBA)和快速上肢评估(RULA)两种人体工程学评估工具对人体工程学危险因素进行量化。使用“OSHA计算机工作站etool -评估清单”对计算机工作站进行评估。结果:计算机工作站使用者的上肢似乎更容易出现与工作相关的肌肉骨骼疾病(WMSD)和重复性应激损伤(RSI)症状。在85.5%的病例中,RULA得分与REBA相同或更高,这表明办公室员工的工作可能导致上肢比下肢更多的紊乱。结论:监护仪的对中是最重要的设计参数。在不同的身体部位中,受影响最大的是躯干,这是由于不良的姿势和/或工作场所设计造成的,其次是肩膀和上臂,以及前臂和手腕。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ergonomic design of a cooling vest in deep and ultra-deep mining environments Validation of laser scanner for the collection of anthropometric measurement Design of a horizontally dynamic armrest for joystick controlled mobile equipment Effect of task factors on the heart rate recovery time in a lifting task Assessment of thermal comfort in a Portuguese metalworking industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1