Scarcity Mindsets and Generational Differences in India: The Role of Cognitive and Affective Factors

Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1177/09713336221080628
R. C. Tripathi, N. Pande, V. N. Tripathi, Shail Shankar, Aditi Pande, Ragini Bahadur
{"title":"Scarcity Mindsets and Generational Differences in India: The Role of Cognitive and Affective Factors","authors":"R. C. Tripathi, N. Pande, V. N. Tripathi, Shail Shankar, Aditi Pande, Ragini Bahadur","doi":"10.1177/09713336221080628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article addressed the question of the role played by certain cognitive and affective factors in explaining the differences in scarcity mindsets of Gen Z, Millennials, and the Pre-millennial generations. Three cognitive factors, namely, horizontal individualism, belief in a just world and a spiritual belief factor, anasakti (non-attachment) along with five affective factors, personal relative deprivation, greed, need for achievement, positive and negative emotions were used as predictors of the scarcity mindsets. Pre-millennials showed a weaker scarcity mindset compared to the Millennials, who among the three had the strongest scarcity mindset. In the case of Gen Z, a downward trend in the scarcity mindset was observed. Male respondents had stronger scarcity mindset than females. Sequential Regression Analysis was used to understand the role played by cognitive and affective factors in predicting scarcity mindset for each generation. It found that cognitive factors were better predictors than affective factors in the case of all three generations. In the case of Gen Z, belief in a just world and anasakti significantly predicted a weak scarcity mindset. Belief in a just world also predicted a weaker scarcity mindset in case of the Millennials and Pre-millennial generations. Personal relative deprivation, an affective factor, was significantly associated with a weak scarcity mindset in the case of Millennials but inversely for the Pre-millennials. A high need for achievement raised the level of scarcity mindset, but only for the Millennial generation. Horizontal individualism and greed did not come out as significant predictors of the scarcity mindset for any generation. The results are discussed in the changing context of globalisation and the digital revolution.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09713336221080628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article addressed the question of the role played by certain cognitive and affective factors in explaining the differences in scarcity mindsets of Gen Z, Millennials, and the Pre-millennial generations. Three cognitive factors, namely, horizontal individualism, belief in a just world and a spiritual belief factor, anasakti (non-attachment) along with five affective factors, personal relative deprivation, greed, need for achievement, positive and negative emotions were used as predictors of the scarcity mindsets. Pre-millennials showed a weaker scarcity mindset compared to the Millennials, who among the three had the strongest scarcity mindset. In the case of Gen Z, a downward trend in the scarcity mindset was observed. Male respondents had stronger scarcity mindset than females. Sequential Regression Analysis was used to understand the role played by cognitive and affective factors in predicting scarcity mindset for each generation. It found that cognitive factors were better predictors than affective factors in the case of all three generations. In the case of Gen Z, belief in a just world and anasakti significantly predicted a weak scarcity mindset. Belief in a just world also predicted a weaker scarcity mindset in case of the Millennials and Pre-millennial generations. Personal relative deprivation, an affective factor, was significantly associated with a weak scarcity mindset in the case of Millennials but inversely for the Pre-millennials. A high need for achievement raised the level of scarcity mindset, but only for the Millennial generation. Horizontal individualism and greed did not come out as significant predictors of the scarcity mindset for any generation. The results are discussed in the changing context of globalisation and the digital revolution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
印度的稀缺心态和代际差异:认知和情感因素的作用
这篇文章探讨了某些认知和情感因素在解释Z世代、千禧一代和千禧一代之前的稀缺心态差异中所起的作用。三个认知因素,即横向个人主义、对正义世界的信仰和精神信仰因素anasakti(非依恋),以及五个情感因素,即个人相对剥夺、贪婪、成就需要、积极和消极情绪,被用作稀缺心态的预测因素。与千禧一代相比,千禧一代表现出较弱的稀缺心态,而千禧一代是三代中稀缺心态最强的一代。在Z世代的案例中,观察到稀缺心态呈下降趋势。男性受访者比女性有更强的稀缺心态。序列回归分析用于了解认知和情感因素在预测每一代人稀缺心态中所起的作用。研究发现,在所有三代人的情况下,认知因素比情感因素更能预测。以Z世代为例,对正义世界和anasakti的信念显著预测了一种脆弱的稀缺心态。对公正世界的信念也预测了千禧一代和千禧一代之前的稀缺心态会减弱。个人相对剥夺是一种情感因素,在千禧一代中与弱势稀缺心态显著相关,但在千禧前一代中则相反。对成就的高度需求提高了稀缺心态的水平,但这只适用于千禧一代。横向的个人主义和贪婪并没有成为任何一代人稀缺心态的重要预测因素。这些结果是在全球化和数字革命不断变化的背景下讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1