Diagnostic accuracy, indications, and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA procedure: retrospective observational study from a referral cancer institute

K. Luthra, Jyoti Singh
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy, indications, and negative predictive value of EBUS-TBNA procedure: retrospective observational study from a referral cancer institute","authors":"K. Luthra, Jyoti Singh","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_47_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is minimally invasive procedure for the evaluation of mediastinal mass and lymph nodes. Aim: This study was conducted as an internal audit to determine diagnostic accuracy, false-negative rate of a costly, invasive procedure EBUS-TBNA performed under conscious sedation or deep/general anesthesia. Methods: Forty-nine patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA procedure at our institute were included in this retrospective study. Sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and negative predictive values were calculated considering clinical radiological assessment till 6 months as gold standard. Results: Forty-nine patients (27 females and 22 males) with mean age of 47.88 years underwent EBUS-TBNA during a period of 8 months. The most common indication was extrathoracic malignancy metastasis in 26 (53.1%) patients. EBUS-TBNA was performed for diagnosing malignancy lung in 11 patients, granulomatous disease in 8 patients, and mediastinal mass in 4 patients. A total of 74 nodes were sampled in 49 patients. Adequate samples were obtained in 46 patients (93.9%). Diagnostic accuracy was overall 91.8%. There were no procedure-related complications or mortality noted in any patient. Out of 17 negative cases, false negatives were 4, and negative-predictive value was 76.5%. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value were higher in procedures performed under deep sedation/general anesthesia. Conclusion: Diagnosing extrathoracic malignancy metastasis and malignancy lung are major indications for the EBUS-TBNA procedure at our institute. The diagnostic accuracy overall was 91.8%. The negative-predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and sensitivity were higher for procedures performed under deep sedation/general anesthesia versus conscious sedation.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":"9 1","pages":"53 - 58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_47_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is minimally invasive procedure for the evaluation of mediastinal mass and lymph nodes. Aim: This study was conducted as an internal audit to determine diagnostic accuracy, false-negative rate of a costly, invasive procedure EBUS-TBNA performed under conscious sedation or deep/general anesthesia. Methods: Forty-nine patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA procedure at our institute were included in this retrospective study. Sensitivity, diagnostic accuracy, and negative predictive values were calculated considering clinical radiological assessment till 6 months as gold standard. Results: Forty-nine patients (27 females and 22 males) with mean age of 47.88 years underwent EBUS-TBNA during a period of 8 months. The most common indication was extrathoracic malignancy metastasis in 26 (53.1%) patients. EBUS-TBNA was performed for diagnosing malignancy lung in 11 patients, granulomatous disease in 8 patients, and mediastinal mass in 4 patients. A total of 74 nodes were sampled in 49 patients. Adequate samples were obtained in 46 patients (93.9%). Diagnostic accuracy was overall 91.8%. There were no procedure-related complications or mortality noted in any patient. Out of 17 negative cases, false negatives were 4, and negative-predictive value was 76.5%. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value were higher in procedures performed under deep sedation/general anesthesia. Conclusion: Diagnosing extrathoracic malignancy metastasis and malignancy lung are major indications for the EBUS-TBNA procedure at our institute. The diagnostic accuracy overall was 91.8%. The negative-predictive value, diagnostic accuracy, and sensitivity were higher for procedures performed under deep sedation/general anesthesia versus conscious sedation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EBUS-TBNA手术的诊断准确性、适应症和阴性预测值:来自转诊癌症研究所的回顾性观察研究
背景:超声引导下经支气管穿刺(EBUS-TBNA)是评估纵隔肿块和淋巴结的微创手术。目的:本研究作为内部审计进行,以确定在清醒镇静或深度/全身麻醉下进行的昂贵的侵入性手术EBUS-TBNA的诊断准确性和假阴性率。方法:对49例在我院行EBUS-TBNA手术的患者进行回顾性研究。以6个月前的临床放射学评价为金标准,计算敏感性、诊断准确性和阴性预测值。结果:49例患者(女27例,男22例),平均年龄47.88岁,接受EBUS-TBNA治疗8个月。最常见的适应症是胸外恶性转移,26例(53.1%)。应用EBUS-TBNA诊断肺恶性肿瘤11例,肉芽肿性疾病8例,纵隔肿块4例。49例患者共74个淋巴结。46例(93.9%)患者获得了足够的样本。诊断正确率为91.8%。所有患者均无手术相关并发症或死亡。17例阴性病例中,假阴性4例,阴性预测值为76.5%。在深度镇静/全身麻醉下进行的诊断准确性、敏感性和阴性预测值更高。结论:诊断胸外恶性转移和肺恶性肿瘤是本院EBUS-TBNA手术的主要适应症。总体诊断准确率为91.8%。与清醒镇静相比,在深度镇静/全身麻醉下进行的手术阴性预测值、诊断准确性和敏感性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Post-COVID-19 pulmonary fibrosis with prognostic risk factors: A study in the hilly state of North India A radiolucent cystic lesion in a chest radiograph of a breathless child − a case report Persistent residual lung abnormalities as final outcome in recovered severe COVID-19 pneumonia with lung function abnormalities in spirometry: Pulmonologist and radiologist perspective Wegener’s granulomatosis versus pulmonary tuberculosis: a dilemma Carcinoid tumorlet/typical carcinoid of the lung: An incidental bronchoscopic finding and cytological dilemma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1