Effects of a vertical electric barrier on the behaviour of Rainbow Trout

IF 0.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/14634988.2019.1624135
Jaewoo Kim, N. Mandrak
{"title":"Effects of a vertical electric barrier on the behaviour of Rainbow Trout","authors":"Jaewoo Kim, N. Mandrak","doi":"10.1080/14634988.2019.1624135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When dealing with invasive fishes, permanent barriers may inhibit spread, but may not be feasible due to costs and logistical constraints. Alternatively, non-permanent barriers using electricity, light, sound, pressure, bubbles, and CO2 are being developed and deployed in efforts to limit and prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species or to achieve fish guidance and conservation. However, the effectiveness of these barriers is quite variable and testing is often lacking for both invasive and native species. We conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of vertical electric barrier on behaviour of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In response to electric current, Rainbow Trout responded by significantly decreasing passage through the electric barrier zone and spending more time away from the electric barrier when it was turned on during the stimulus period compared to pre-stimulus period. Moreover, when interacting with electric barrier, Rainbow Trout exhibited certain behaviours (e.g. stunned and remained on the same side of the barrier, stunned and crossed the barrier) more than others (e.g. approach and retreat, deflected, and paralyzed). Moreover, it appears that Rainbow Trout remained distant from the electric barrier even after the electric barrier was turned off. Our results indicate that relatively weak electric gradient (i.e. voltage gradient: 0.2 – 0.4 v·cm−1, power density: 3 – 42 µW·cm−3) can inhibit the movement of Rainbow Trout. Our results also highlight the importance of detailed investigation of behavioural responses of target species when evaluating and considering fish-deterrent or guidance technologies.","PeriodicalId":8125,"journal":{"name":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"183 - 192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14634988.2019.1624135","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14634988.2019.1624135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

When dealing with invasive fishes, permanent barriers may inhibit spread, but may not be feasible due to costs and logistical constraints. Alternatively, non-permanent barriers using electricity, light, sound, pressure, bubbles, and CO2 are being developed and deployed in efforts to limit and prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species or to achieve fish guidance and conservation. However, the effectiveness of these barriers is quite variable and testing is often lacking for both invasive and native species. We conducted a laboratory experiment to investigate the impact of vertical electric barrier on behaviour of Rainbow Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss. In response to electric current, Rainbow Trout responded by significantly decreasing passage through the electric barrier zone and spending more time away from the electric barrier when it was turned on during the stimulus period compared to pre-stimulus period. Moreover, when interacting with electric barrier, Rainbow Trout exhibited certain behaviours (e.g. stunned and remained on the same side of the barrier, stunned and crossed the barrier) more than others (e.g. approach and retreat, deflected, and paralyzed). Moreover, it appears that Rainbow Trout remained distant from the electric barrier even after the electric barrier was turned off. Our results indicate that relatively weak electric gradient (i.e. voltage gradient: 0.2 – 0.4 v·cm−1, power density: 3 – 42 µW·cm−3) can inhibit the movement of Rainbow Trout. Our results also highlight the importance of detailed investigation of behavioural responses of target species when evaluating and considering fish-deterrent or guidance technologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
垂直电屏障对虹鳟鱼行为的影响
在处理入侵鱼类时,永久性屏障可能会抑制传播,但由于成本和物流限制,可能不可行。或者,正在开发和部署使用电力、光线、声音、压力、气泡和二氧化碳的非永久性屏障,以限制和防止水生入侵物种的传播,或实现鱼类指导和保护。然而,这些屏障的有效性变化很大,入侵物种和本土物种往往缺乏测试。我们进行了一项实验室实验,以研究垂直电屏障对虹鳟(Oncorhynchus mykiss)行为的影响。在对电流的反应中,彩虹鳟鱼的反应是,与刺激前相比,在刺激期内,当它打开时,通过电屏障区的通道显著减少,并且离开电屏障的时间更长。此外,当与电屏障相互作用时,彩虹鳟鱼表现出的某些行为(例如震惊并停留在屏障的同一侧,震惊并越过屏障)比其他行为(例如接近和后退,偏转和瘫痪)更多。此外,即使在电屏障关闭后,彩虹鳟鱼似乎仍然远离电屏障。我们的结果表明,相对较弱的电梯度(即电压梯度:0.2–0.4 v·cm−1,功率密度:3–42µW·cm−3)可以抑制彩虹鳟鱼的运动。我们的研究结果还强调了在评估和考虑鱼类威慑或指导技术时,详细调查目标物种行为反应的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management
Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes articles on the following themes and topics: • Original articles focusing on ecosystem-based sciences, ecosystem health and management of marine and aquatic ecosystems • Reviews, invited perspectives and keynote contributions from conferences • Special issues on important emerging topics, themes, and ecosystems (climate change, invasive species, HABs, risk assessment, models)
期刊最新文献
Impacts of dreissenid mussel growth and activity on phytoplankton and nutrients in Lake Erie's western basin Calibration versus computation: Comparison between 1D and 3D phytoplankton simulations in western Lake Erie Nitrification in the water column of Lake Erie: Seasonal patterns, community dynamics, and competition with cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms Dynamics of dissolved organic phosphorus in the nearshore of eastern Lake Erie Seasonal interactions between Quagga Mussel grazing and phytoplankton in western Lake Erie: The view from different measuring technologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1