Supporting teachers to develop formative assessment knowledge and skills in no-fee schools

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH South African Journal of Childhood Education Pub Date : 2023-01-27 DOI:10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1247
J. K. Ramollo, A. Kanjee
{"title":"Supporting teachers to develop formative assessment knowledge and skills in no-fee schools","authors":"J. K. Ramollo, A. Kanjee","doi":"10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Formative assessment has been reported to improve learners’ learning in affluent contexts. However, very few studies have reported the impact of formative assessment on teachers’ knowledge and understanding in no-fee public schools located in a low socio-economic context.Aim: This article investigates the impact of the Assessment for Learning Capacity Development Programme (AfL CDP) on teachers’ formative assessment knowledge and understanding pertaining to the five formative assessment strategies: learning intentions and success criteria, questioning, feedback, peer and self-assessment.Setting: This study was conducted as part of the Assessment for Learning (AfL) in Africa project in one Gauteng district involving 20 Grade 3 teachers from six no-fee public schools.Methods: Teachers in this study participated in the AfL CDP, implemented using the reflect, mediate, acquire and adapt, plan, prepare, present, support (ReMAPS) intervention framework. Baseline and endline data were collected using the formative assessment reflection exercises (FARE) before and after the AfL CDP, while t-tests were used to determine differences in performance.Results: The results revealed significant improvements in teacher formative assessment knowledge and understanding across all five strategies.Conclusion: The ReMAPS intervention framework, applied in the AfL CDP, proved successful in supporting teachers to improve their formative assessment knowledge and understanding, even when implemented in challenging contexts, and provides a viable, practical model for implementing AfL pedagogical strategy by the Department of Education.Contribution: This study adds to the body of knowledge by providing research-based findings about how an AfL capacity development programme implemented in a challenging context in South Africa, benefited teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and understanding.","PeriodicalId":55958,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Childhood Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v13i1.1247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Formative assessment has been reported to improve learners’ learning in affluent contexts. However, very few studies have reported the impact of formative assessment on teachers’ knowledge and understanding in no-fee public schools located in a low socio-economic context.Aim: This article investigates the impact of the Assessment for Learning Capacity Development Programme (AfL CDP) on teachers’ formative assessment knowledge and understanding pertaining to the five formative assessment strategies: learning intentions and success criteria, questioning, feedback, peer and self-assessment.Setting: This study was conducted as part of the Assessment for Learning (AfL) in Africa project in one Gauteng district involving 20 Grade 3 teachers from six no-fee public schools.Methods: Teachers in this study participated in the AfL CDP, implemented using the reflect, mediate, acquire and adapt, plan, prepare, present, support (ReMAPS) intervention framework. Baseline and endline data were collected using the formative assessment reflection exercises (FARE) before and after the AfL CDP, while t-tests were used to determine differences in performance.Results: The results revealed significant improvements in teacher formative assessment knowledge and understanding across all five strategies.Conclusion: The ReMAPS intervention framework, applied in the AfL CDP, proved successful in supporting teachers to improve their formative assessment knowledge and understanding, even when implemented in challenging contexts, and provides a viable, practical model for implementing AfL pedagogical strategy by the Department of Education.Contribution: This study adds to the body of knowledge by providing research-based findings about how an AfL capacity development programme implemented in a challenging context in South Africa, benefited teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and understanding.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持教师在免费学校发展形成性评估知识和技能
背景:据报道,形成性评估可以改善学习者在富裕环境中的学习。然而,很少有研究报告了形成性评估对位于低社会经济背景下的免费公立学校教师的知识和理解的影响。目的:研究学习能力发展评估计划(AfL CDP)对教师关于五种形成性评估策略(学习意图和成功标准、提问、反馈、同伴和自我评估)的形成性评估知识和理解的影响。背景:本研究作为非洲学习评估项目的一部分,在豪登省的一个地区进行,涉及来自六所免费公立学校的20名三年级教师。方法:采用反思、调解、获取与适应、计划、准备、呈现、支持(ReMAPS)干预框架,对本研究的教师实施AfL CDP。在AfL CDP前后使用形成性评估反思练习(FARE)收集基线和终点数据,而t检验用于确定表现差异。结果:结果显示,教师形成性评估的知识和理解在所有五种策略显著改善。结论:在AfL CDP中应用的ReMAPS干预框架,即使在具有挑战性的环境中实施,也证明在支持教师提高他们的形成性评估知识和理解方面是成功的,并且为教育部实施AfL教学策略提供了一个可行的,实用的模型。贡献:本研究通过提供基于研究的发现,增加了知识体系,说明在南非具有挑战性的背景下实施的AfL能力发展计划如何使教师的教学知识和理解受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
South African Journal of Childhood Education
South African Journal of Childhood Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parental involvement in the case of primary school children with autism during COVID-19 Investigating critical citizenship education within primary school art curriculum South African teachers work with division actions in Grade 3 Enhancing visual-motor integration and visual perception of 6-year-old children School readiness in South Africa: Concept analysis and plain language summary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1