Evaluating Split Nitrogen Applications and In-Season Tests for Organic Winter Bread Wheat

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Organic Farming Pub Date : 2017-02-13 DOI:10.12924/OF2017.03010003
E. Roche, E. Mallory, H. Darby
{"title":"Evaluating Split Nitrogen Applications and In-Season Tests for Organic Winter Bread Wheat","authors":"E. Roche, E. Mallory, H. Darby","doi":"10.12924/OF2017.03010003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Achieving high grain yields and crude protein (CP) standards in organic winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is challenging because ensuring that adequate nitrogen (N) is available at key periods of wheat growth is difficult in organic systems. Split application regimes and in-season N management tests may improve organic production. In field trials conducted over four site-years in Maine and Vermont, USA, N application regimes were analyzed for their effects on organic winter wheat, N uptake, grain yield, and CP. Tiller density and tissue N tests were evaluated as in-season decision tools. Eight treatments arranged in a non-factorial design differed in terms of N application timing (pre-plant (PP), topdress at tillering (T1), and topdress at pre-stem extension (T2)) and N rate. Treatments were: (1) an untreated check, (2) pre-plant N at a low rate of 78 kg N ha −1 (PP L ), (3) pre-plant N at a high rate of 117 or 157 kg N ha −1 (PP H ), (4) T1 78 , (5) PP L + T1 39 , (6) PP L + T2 39 , (7) PP H + T2 39 , and (8) PP L + T1 39 +T2 39 . Responses to N treatments were variable among site-years, however some common results were identified. The PP-only treatments increased grain yields more than they increased CP. The T1 78 and PP H + T2 39 treatments were the most effective at increasing yield and CP, compared with the PP-only treatments. Tiller density and tissue N tests were good predictors of grain yield (r = 0.52, p < and CP (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) respectively. Future work should test in-season decision tools using a wider range of tiller densities, and topdress N rates against tissue N measurements.","PeriodicalId":36542,"journal":{"name":"Organic Farming","volume":"3 1","pages":"3-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organic Farming","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12924/OF2017.03010003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Achieving high grain yields and crude protein (CP) standards in organic winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is challenging because ensuring that adequate nitrogen (N) is available at key periods of wheat growth is difficult in organic systems. Split application regimes and in-season N management tests may improve organic production. In field trials conducted over four site-years in Maine and Vermont, USA, N application regimes were analyzed for their effects on organic winter wheat, N uptake, grain yield, and CP. Tiller density and tissue N tests were evaluated as in-season decision tools. Eight treatments arranged in a non-factorial design differed in terms of N application timing (pre-plant (PP), topdress at tillering (T1), and topdress at pre-stem extension (T2)) and N rate. Treatments were: (1) an untreated check, (2) pre-plant N at a low rate of 78 kg N ha −1 (PP L ), (3) pre-plant N at a high rate of 117 or 157 kg N ha −1 (PP H ), (4) T1 78 , (5) PP L + T1 39 , (6) PP L + T2 39 , (7) PP H + T2 39 , and (8) PP L + T1 39 +T2 39 . Responses to N treatments were variable among site-years, however some common results were identified. The PP-only treatments increased grain yields more than they increased CP. The T1 78 and PP H + T2 39 treatments were the most effective at increasing yield and CP, compared with the PP-only treatments. Tiller density and tissue N tests were good predictors of grain yield (r = 0.52, p < and CP (r = 0.75, p < 0.001) respectively. Future work should test in-season decision tools using a wider range of tiller densities, and topdress N rates against tissue N measurements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有机冬小麦劈裂施氮评价及季内试验
在有机冬小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)中实现高产量和粗蛋白质(CP)标准是具有挑战性的,因为在小麦生长的关键时期确保足够的氮(N)是困难的。分施氮肥制度和当季氮肥管理试验可提高有机产量。在美国缅因州和佛蒙特州进行了为期4年的田间试验,分析了施氮制度对有机冬小麦、氮素吸收、籽粒产量和CP的影响。分蘖密度和组织氮测试作为当季决策工具进行了评估。按非因子设计安排的8个处理在施氮时机(孕前施氮、分蘖期施氮、茎伸期施氮)和施氮量方面存在差异。处理方法为:(1)未经处理,(2)低施氮量为78 kg N ha−1 (PP L),(3)高施氮量为117或157 kg N ha−1 (PP H), (4) T1 78, (5) PP L + T1 39, (6) PP L +T2 39, (7) PP H +T2 39, (8) PP L + T1 39 +T2 39。对氮处理的反应在不同的站点年之间是不同的,但是确定了一些共同的结果。单用PP处理对籽粒产量的提高大于单用PP处理对CP的提高,单用T1 78和PP H + T2 39处理对产量和CP的提高效果最好。分蘖密度和组织氮试验分别是籽粒产量的良好预测因子(r = 0.52, p <)和CP (r = 0.75, p < 0.001)。未来的工作应该测试当季决策工具,使用更大范围的分蘖密度,以及顶施氮率与组织氮测量值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Organic Farming
Organic Farming Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
On-farm Validation of Coffee arabica and Aloe vera Extracts for Management of Seed-Borne Bacterial Leaf Spot Disease of Tomato Growth and Yield Responses of Leafy Vegetables Grown in Organic and Conventional Agriculture Systems On-farm Research to Diversify Organic Farming Systems A Proposal for Improving Organic Group Certification Quantification of Internal Control Systems' Performance and Sample Size Determination Carrying Capacity of Traditional Farming in South East England: A Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1