Cross-sectional Study of PONV Risk Factors for Oral Surgery After Intubated General Anesthesia With Total Intravenous Anesthesia.

Q3 Medicine Anesthesia progress Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.2344/anpr-68-03-12
Emi Ishikawa, Rie Iwamoto, Takayuki Hojo, Takahito Teshirogi, Keiji Hashimoto, M. Shibuya, Y. Kimura, T. Fujisawa
{"title":"Cross-sectional Study of PONV Risk Factors for Oral Surgery After Intubated General Anesthesia With Total Intravenous Anesthesia.","authors":"Emi Ishikawa, Rie Iwamoto, Takayuki Hojo, Takahito Teshirogi, Keiji Hashimoto, M. Shibuya, Y. Kimura, T. Fujisawa","doi":"10.2344/anpr-68-03-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nThe incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was reported to be significantly lower than with volatile inhalational agents (13.3% vs 25%). However, no investigation of PONV risk factors associated with TIVA has ever been reported. This cross-sectional retrospective study aimed to investigate whether known risk factors influenced PONV in intubated general anesthetics utilizing TIVA for dental or oral and maxillofacial surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nSubjects were 761 patients who underwent dental or oral and maxillofacial surgery under TIVA with propofol, fentanyl, and remifentanil. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using PONV (within 24 hours) as the dependent variable and previously reported risk factors as independent variables.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAge (odds ratio [OR]: 1.020 per year decrease; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0002-1.0418; P = .047) and female sex (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.60-4.84; P < .001) were positively associated with PONV. Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.21-4.33; P = .011) and bimaxillary osteotomy (OR: 5.69; 95% CI: 2.09-15.99; P < .001) were more likely to be associated with PONV than operations that were neither bimaxillary osteotomy nor SSRO. Late PONV (2-24 hours) had an ∼2.7 times higher incidence than early PONV (0-2 hours).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThese findings suggest further PONV countermeasures, aside from TIVA with propofol and prophylactic antiemetics for orthognathic surgeries especially bimaxillary osteotomy, are needed.","PeriodicalId":7818,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia progress","volume":"69 1 1","pages":"18-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia progress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2344/anpr-68-03-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after general anesthesia with total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) was reported to be significantly lower than with volatile inhalational agents (13.3% vs 25%). However, no investigation of PONV risk factors associated with TIVA has ever been reported. This cross-sectional retrospective study aimed to investigate whether known risk factors influenced PONV in intubated general anesthetics utilizing TIVA for dental or oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHODS Subjects were 761 patients who underwent dental or oral and maxillofacial surgery under TIVA with propofol, fentanyl, and remifentanil. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed using PONV (within 24 hours) as the dependent variable and previously reported risk factors as independent variables. RESULTS Age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.020 per year decrease; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0002-1.0418; P = .047) and female sex (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.60-4.84; P < .001) were positively associated with PONV. Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) (OR: 2.28; 95% CI: 1.21-4.33; P = .011) and bimaxillary osteotomy (OR: 5.69; 95% CI: 2.09-15.99; P < .001) were more likely to be associated with PONV than operations that were neither bimaxillary osteotomy nor SSRO. Late PONV (2-24 hours) had an ∼2.7 times higher incidence than early PONV (0-2 hours). CONCLUSION These findings suggest further PONV countermeasures, aside from TIVA with propofol and prophylactic antiemetics for orthognathic surgeries especially bimaxillary osteotomy, are needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
插管全麻加全静脉麻醉后口腔手术PONV危险因素的横断面研究。
目的据报道,全身静脉麻醉(TIVA)全麻后术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率显著低于挥发性吸入剂(13.3%vs 25%)。然而,目前还没有关于与TIVA相关的PONV风险因素的研究报告。这项横断面回顾性研究旨在调查已知的风险因素是否影响在牙科或口腔颌面外科使用TIVA的插管全身麻醉剂中的PONV。方法761例患者在丙泊酚、芬太尼和瑞芬太尼的TIVA下接受了牙科或口腔颌面外科手术。使用PONV(24小时内)作为因变量,使用先前报告的风险因素作为自变量进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析。结果年龄(比值比[OR]:每年下降1.020;95%置信区间[CI]:1.0002-1.0418;P=.047)和女性(比值比:2.73;95%可信区间:1.60-4.84;P<.001)与PONV呈正相关。矢状支劈开截骨(SSRO)(OR:2.28;95%CI:1.21-433;P=.011)和双上颌截骨(OR:5.69;95%CI:2.09-15.99;P<.001)与PONV的相关性高于既不是双上颌截骨术也不是SSRO的手术。晚期PONV(2-24小时)的发病率是早期PONV的约2.7倍(0-2小时)。结论这些发现表明,除了丙泊酚的TIVA和预防性止吐剂用于正颌手术,特别是双上颌截骨外,还需要进一步的PONV对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia progress
Anesthesia progress Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Anesthesia Progress is a peer-reviewed journal and the official publication of the American Dental Society of Anesthesiology. The journal is dedicated to providing a better understanding of the advances being made in the art and science of pain and anxiety control in dentistry.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Sedation Levels Using SedLine During Intravenous Sedation for Dental Procedures: A Case-Series Study. Cardiac Arrest Due to Pacing Failure From Pilsicainide Poisoning. A New Dental Specialty in Canada. Literature Review for Office-Based Anesthesia. Hypotension Without Skin Symptoms at Local Anesthesia in Dental Treatment: Anaphylaxis? Or Vasovagal Reaction?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1