Catalogue of 2001–2011 New Zealand earthquakes relocated with 3-D seismic velocity model and comparison to 2019–2020 auto-detected earthquakes in the sparsely instrumented southern South Island

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q1 GEOLOGY New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1080/00288306.2022.2089171
D. Eberhart‐Phillips, M. Reyners
{"title":"Catalogue of 2001–2011 New Zealand earthquakes relocated with 3-D seismic velocity model and comparison to 2019–2020 auto-detected earthquakes in the sparsely instrumented southern South Island","authors":"D. Eberhart‐Phillips, M. Reyners","doi":"10.1080/00288306.2022.2089171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Here we update a catalogue of 2001–2011 New Zealand earthquakes relocated with a 3-D seismic velocity model, which has recent improvements. We use P- and S-wave arrival times from earthquakes during 2001–2011 as these were manually picked with assigned quality. We demonstrate the usefulness of the catalogue by considering results from the southern South Island where GeoNet seismograph spacing is large. Later phase data used automatic picking and processing of arrival times. We relocate the 2019–2020 data from National Geohazards Monitoring Centre (NGMC) and compare seismicity patterns to consider its usefulness. We find that the auto-detected crustal earthquakes are more sparse in most of the southern South Island compared to the earlier analyst-picked data period, including Fiordland, which is one of the most seismically active areas in New Zealand. The auto-detected seismicity pattern is also problematic at greater depth and does not show a seismicity band in the lower crust across Southland evident in 2001–2011 data. The detection capability could be improved with a much denser permanent network. We recommend that the 2001–2011 relocated catalogues be used in studies of tectonics and seismic hazard across the South Island, and in studies that consider New Zealand wide seismicity patterns.","PeriodicalId":49752,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2022.2089171","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Here we update a catalogue of 2001–2011 New Zealand earthquakes relocated with a 3-D seismic velocity model, which has recent improvements. We use P- and S-wave arrival times from earthquakes during 2001–2011 as these were manually picked with assigned quality. We demonstrate the usefulness of the catalogue by considering results from the southern South Island where GeoNet seismograph spacing is large. Later phase data used automatic picking and processing of arrival times. We relocate the 2019–2020 data from National Geohazards Monitoring Centre (NGMC) and compare seismicity patterns to consider its usefulness. We find that the auto-detected crustal earthquakes are more sparse in most of the southern South Island compared to the earlier analyst-picked data period, including Fiordland, which is one of the most seismically active areas in New Zealand. The auto-detected seismicity pattern is also problematic at greater depth and does not show a seismicity band in the lower crust across Southland evident in 2001–2011 data. The detection capability could be improved with a much denser permanent network. We recommend that the 2001–2011 relocated catalogues be used in studies of tectonics and seismic hazard across the South Island, and in studies that consider New Zealand wide seismicity patterns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用三维地震速度模型重新定位2001-2011年新西兰地震目录,并与南岛南部仪器稀少的2019-2020年自动检测地震进行比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
27.30%
发文量
34
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aims: New Zealand is well respected for its growing research activity in the geosciences, particularly in circum-Pacific earth science. The New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics plays an important role in disseminating field-based, experimental, and theoretical research to geoscientists with interests both within and beyond the circum-Pacific. Scope of submissions: The New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics publishes original research papers, review papers, short communications and letters. We welcome submissions on all aspects of the earth sciences relevant to New Zealand, the Pacific Rim, and Antarctica. The subject matter includes geology, geophysics, physical geography and pedology.
期刊最新文献
Redistribution of fine gold from hydrothermal sources to sedimentary sinks, Rakaia River, Canterbury, New Zealand Beach gold transport and aeolian concentration, southern New Zealand Limited role of present-day onshore freshwater recharge in the emplacement of offshore freshened groundwater in the Canterbury Bight, New Zealand Understanding sedimentary systems and processes of the Hikurangi subduction margin; from Trench to Back-Arc. Volume 2 Geoecology of limestone-hosted dryland calcicolous plants, North Otago, New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1