Evaluation of the suitability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas in estimating age for the Botswana population using hand and wrist radiographs of young Botswana population

Baraedi Olaotse , Phokedi Gothatamang Norma , Panzirah-Mabaka Kaone , Mosothwane Morongwa , Mokgadi Janes , Kemiso Kabo , Mugoma Shathani , Patlakwe Thato
{"title":"Evaluation of the suitability of the Greulich and Pyle atlas in estimating age for the Botswana population using hand and wrist radiographs of young Botswana population","authors":"Baraedi Olaotse ,&nbsp;Phokedi Gothatamang Norma ,&nbsp;Panzirah-Mabaka Kaone ,&nbsp;Mosothwane Morongwa ,&nbsp;Mokgadi Janes ,&nbsp;Kemiso Kabo ,&nbsp;Mugoma Shathani ,&nbsp;Patlakwe Thato","doi":"10.1016/j.fsir.2023.100312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas for estimating age for court cases that require age estimation amongst the Botswana population is often questioned because the atlas has been adopted without being evaluated for Botswana. It has long been established that accuracies of such age estimation methods are dependent on different factors such as the general health and nutrition of the population. We present a study aimed at determining the level of accuracy of the Greulich and Pyle atlas at estimating age for the Botswana population. It is the first time that this type of study is being performed for Botswana. The results will be used to confirm if there is need to develop specific age estimation standards for Botswana. A total of 140 x-ray image samples were obtained from local hospitals for patients aged between 5 and 18 years. The sample images were compared with the Greulich and Pyle age estimation standards. In forensic age estimations, there are several important age limits which are considered. The legal age of maturity for Botswana is 18 years. This age limit is very important in determining whether offenders should be tried as children or adults and at the same time, in determining if victims are minors or adults. It also forms the basis for sentencing of offenders for crimes committed against children. For the important age group 15 ≤ 18 the mean skeletal age difference was found to be 0.94 (statistically significant) indicating that age was underestimated for males. This could be a problem where a perpetrator’s age is underestimated as a result not sentenced accordingly as they are mistaken for a minor. The mean skeletal age difference for females was found to be 0.64 years, indicating that age was underestimated by up to 0.64 years for females while the mean skeletal age difference was found to be 0.50 years for males in overall. This indicated that the Greulich and Pyle atlas underestimated age by 0.50 years overall. Significant statistical difference was observed between the mean chronological age and the mean estimated age as the p-values were found to be 0.03 for females and 0.05 for males. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the Greulich and Pyle atlas can be used to estimate age but with caution as there is a possibility of errors. There is need for this atlas to be revised to reduce errors in age estimation for the Botswana context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36331,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Science International: Reports","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Science International: Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665910723000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The applicability of Greulich and Pyle atlas for estimating age for court cases that require age estimation amongst the Botswana population is often questioned because the atlas has been adopted without being evaluated for Botswana. It has long been established that accuracies of such age estimation methods are dependent on different factors such as the general health and nutrition of the population. We present a study aimed at determining the level of accuracy of the Greulich and Pyle atlas at estimating age for the Botswana population. It is the first time that this type of study is being performed for Botswana. The results will be used to confirm if there is need to develop specific age estimation standards for Botswana. A total of 140 x-ray image samples were obtained from local hospitals for patients aged between 5 and 18 years. The sample images were compared with the Greulich and Pyle age estimation standards. In forensic age estimations, there are several important age limits which are considered. The legal age of maturity for Botswana is 18 years. This age limit is very important in determining whether offenders should be tried as children or adults and at the same time, in determining if victims are minors or adults. It also forms the basis for sentencing of offenders for crimes committed against children. For the important age group 15 ≤ 18 the mean skeletal age difference was found to be 0.94 (statistically significant) indicating that age was underestimated for males. This could be a problem where a perpetrator’s age is underestimated as a result not sentenced accordingly as they are mistaken for a minor. The mean skeletal age difference for females was found to be 0.64 years, indicating that age was underestimated by up to 0.64 years for females while the mean skeletal age difference was found to be 0.50 years for males in overall. This indicated that the Greulich and Pyle atlas underestimated age by 0.50 years overall. Significant statistical difference was observed between the mean chronological age and the mean estimated age as the p-values were found to be 0.03 for females and 0.05 for males. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that the Greulich and Pyle atlas can be used to estimate age but with caution as there is a possibility of errors. There is need for this atlas to be revised to reduce errors in age estimation for the Botswana context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估Greulich和Pyle地图集在使用年轻博茨瓦纳人口的手和手腕x线片估计博茨瓦纳人口年龄方面的适用性
对于需要在博茨瓦纳人口中估计年龄的法庭案件,Greulich和Pyle地图集在估计年龄方面的适用性经常受到质疑,因为地图集在没有对博茨瓦纳进行评估的情况下被采用。人们早已确定,这种年龄估计方法的准确性取决于不同的因素,例如人口的总体健康和营养状况。我们提出了一项研究,旨在确定格鲁里奇和派尔地图集在估计博茨瓦纳人口年龄时的准确性水平。这是第一次为博茨瓦纳进行这种类型的研究。研究结果将用于确认是否需要为博茨瓦纳制定具体的年龄估计标准。从当地医院获得5 ~ 18岁患者的x线图像样本140张。将样本图像与Greulich和Pyle年龄估计标准进行比较。在法医年龄估计中,有几个重要的年龄限制需要考虑。博茨瓦纳的法定成年年龄是18岁。这一年龄限制对于确定罪犯应作为儿童还是成年人受审,同时对于确定受害者是未成年人还是成年人,都是非常重要的。它也是对侵害儿童罪行的罪犯量刑的依据。对于15≤18岁的重要年龄组,平均骨骼年龄差为0.94(有统计学意义),表明男性年龄被低估。这可能是一个问题,因为犯罪者的年龄被低估,导致他们被误认为未成年人而没有得到相应的判决。女性的平均骨骼年龄差异为0.64岁,表明女性的年龄被低估了0.64岁,而男性的平均骨骼年龄差异总体上为0.50岁。这表明Greulich和Pyle地图集总体上低估了年龄0.50年。平均实足年龄与平均估计年龄的差异有统计学意义,女性的p值为0.03,男性的p值为0.05。基于这些发现,可以得出结论,Greulich和Pyle地图集可以用来估计年龄,但要谨慎,因为有可能出现错误。有必要对该地图集进行修订,以减少博茨瓦纳背景下年龄估计的错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forensic Science International: Reports
Forensic Science International: Reports Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Survey of bloodstain pattern analysts regarding pattern classifications on assorted fabrics Missing persons of post-conflict countries: Assessing dental identification through a questionnaire-based study in Syria Technical Report A light touch; Reviewing the relative effectiveness of light sources and physical/chemical techniques for fingermark retrieval in casework From death to the Virgin birth: Multi-analytical investigation of a suspected 16th century painting Medico-legal analysis of the correlation between head trauma and aneurysm rupture: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1