A global systematic review of publications concerning the invasion biology of four tree species

IF 0.6 Q4 ECOLOGY Hacquetia Pub Date : 2019-07-12 DOI:10.2478/hacq-2019-0005
A. Khapugin
{"title":"A global systematic review of publications concerning the invasion biology of four tree species","authors":"A. Khapugin","doi":"10.2478/hacq-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Paper presents a systematic global review of Acer negundo, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Ailanthus altissima, Robinia pseudoacacia invasions focusing on the Scopus and Web of Science databases. We examined the data on papers, study areas, habitat studied, topic discussed. We hypothesized that these species were studied evenly throughout their invaded ranges and, as such, indexed by international databases. We asked whether four selected species are presented evenly in publications related to their invaded ranges, and whether both selected databases cover well a content of these papers. We found 48 papers for A. negundo, 14 – for F. pennsylvanica, 83 – for A. altissima, 96 – for R. pseudoacacia. A high percentage of the studies were conducted in Central Europe and USA (for A. altissima), while Eastern Europe, Russia, Western United States were poorly represented. Most studies were conducted in forests, and focused on impacts or distribution of aliens in invaded range, and their control and management. We encountered habitat types invaded by trees, factors influencing tree invasions, consequences of invaders’ impact on ecosystems, counteracting measures. We concluded that the use only Web of Science and Scopus is not sufficient to obtain the complete data about the invasion biology.","PeriodicalId":39239,"journal":{"name":"Hacquetia","volume":"18 1","pages":"233 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hacquetia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/hacq-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract Paper presents a systematic global review of Acer negundo, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Ailanthus altissima, Robinia pseudoacacia invasions focusing on the Scopus and Web of Science databases. We examined the data on papers, study areas, habitat studied, topic discussed. We hypothesized that these species were studied evenly throughout their invaded ranges and, as such, indexed by international databases. We asked whether four selected species are presented evenly in publications related to their invaded ranges, and whether both selected databases cover well a content of these papers. We found 48 papers for A. negundo, 14 – for F. pennsylvanica, 83 – for A. altissima, 96 – for R. pseudoacacia. A high percentage of the studies were conducted in Central Europe and USA (for A. altissima), while Eastern Europe, Russia, Western United States were poorly represented. Most studies were conducted in forests, and focused on impacts or distribution of aliens in invaded range, and their control and management. We encountered habitat types invaded by trees, factors influencing tree invasions, consequences of invaders’ impact on ecosystems, counteracting measures. We concluded that the use only Web of Science and Scopus is not sufficient to obtain the complete data about the invasion biology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四种树种入侵生物学相关文献的全球系统综述
摘要本文以Scopus和Web of Science数据库为重点,对Acer negundo、Fraxinus pennylvanica、Aillanthus altissima和Robinia pseudoacia的入侵进行了系统的全球综述。我们检查了论文、研究区域、研究栖息地和讨论主题上的数据。我们假设,这些物种在其入侵范围内得到了均匀的研究,因此,国际数据库对其进行了索引。我们询问了四个选定的物种是否在与其入侵范围相关的出版物中平均出现,以及两个选定的数据库是否都很好地涵盖了这些论文的内容。我们为A.negundo找到了48篇论文,为F.pennsylvanica找到了14篇,为A.altissima找到了83篇,为R.pseudoacia找到了96篇。在中欧和美国进行的研究比例很高(针对高海拔A.altissima),而东欧、俄罗斯和美国西部的研究代表性较差。大多数研究都是在森林中进行的,重点是外星人在入侵范围内的影响或分布,以及他们的控制和管理。我们遇到了树木入侵的栖息地类型、影响树木入侵的因素、入侵者对生态系统影响的后果、应对措施。我们得出的结论是,仅使用科学网和Scopus不足以获得有关入侵生物学的完整数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hacquetia
Hacquetia Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rare shady chasmophytic habitat communities (8210) in Ukraine A new Asphodelus ramosus-dominated association from the Murge Plateau (SE Italy) Additional records on the occurrence of two alien Leguminosae in Algeria Forest habitats on the territory of the National Park “Central Balkan” Bulgaria Vegetation and Annex I habitats of a suburban river in southern Tuscany (central Italy): remnants of plant diversity or need for restoration?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1