Traditional, transitional and new performance management practices in Australian organisations: incidence, coverage and perceived effectiveness

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1111/1744-7941.12372
John Shields, Sunghoon Kim, Anjali Chhetri, Pauline Stanton, Alan Nankervis
{"title":"Traditional, transitional and new performance management practices in Australian organisations: incidence, coverage and perceived effectiveness","authors":"John Shields,&nbsp;Sunghoon Kim,&nbsp;Anjali Chhetri,&nbsp;Pauline Stanton,&nbsp;Alan Nankervis","doi":"10.1111/1744-7941.12372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The shortcomings of traditional performance management practices (PMS) are widely acknowledged. There is growing interest in ‘New Performance Management’, suggesting a shift from an evaluative to a developmental focus. In Australia, little is known about the current utilisation of both ‘old’ and ‘new’ practices. Using survey data from Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI) members we examine the incidence, coverage and perceived effectiveness of ‘traditional’, ‘transitional’ and ‘new’ practices in Australian organisations. Further, since data were gathered during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examine the reported effects of pandemic-related disruptions on practice intensity. Although descriptive results suggest that both workforce size and sector may be associated with practice incidence, regression results indicate that sectoral effects are non-significant, and size matters only in relation to traditional practice use. However, our regression results indicate that COVID-19's impact is significantly related to all three practice categories. Furthermore, overall PMS effectiveness is not rated highly.</p>","PeriodicalId":51582,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1744-7941.12372","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-7941.12372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shortcomings of traditional performance management practices (PMS) are widely acknowledged. There is growing interest in ‘New Performance Management’, suggesting a shift from an evaluative to a developmental focus. In Australia, little is known about the current utilisation of both ‘old’ and ‘new’ practices. Using survey data from Australian Human Resources Institute (AHRI) members we examine the incidence, coverage and perceived effectiveness of ‘traditional’, ‘transitional’ and ‘new’ practices in Australian organisations. Further, since data were gathered during the COVID-19 pandemic, we examine the reported effects of pandemic-related disruptions on practice intensity. Although descriptive results suggest that both workforce size and sector may be associated with practice incidence, regression results indicate that sectoral effects are non-significant, and size matters only in relation to traditional practice use. However, our regression results indicate that COVID-19's impact is significantly related to all three practice categories. Furthermore, overall PMS effectiveness is not rated highly.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚组织的传统、过渡和新的绩效管理实践:发生率、覆盖面和感知有效性
传统绩效管理实践(PMS)的缺点已得到广泛认可。人们对“新绩效管理”越来越感兴趣,这表明从评估转向发展。在澳大利亚,人们对目前“旧”和“新”做法的使用情况知之甚少。利用澳大利亚人力资源研究所(AHRI)成员的调查数据,我们研究了澳大利亚组织中“传统”、“过渡”和“新”做法的发生率、覆盖率和感知有效性。此外,由于数据是在新冠肺炎大流行期间收集的,我们研究了与流行病相关的中断对练习强度的影响。尽管描述性结果表明,劳动力规模和部门可能与实践发生率有关,但回归结果表明,部门影响并不显著,规模仅与传统实践使用有关。然而,我们的回归结果表明,新冠肺炎的影响与所有三个实践类别显著相关。此外,PMS的总体有效性评价不高。©2023作者。John Wiley&Sons Australia,Ltd代表澳大利亚人力资源研究所(AHRI)出版的《亚太人力资源杂志》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources adheres to a rigorous double-blind reviewing policy in which the identity of both the reviewer and author are always concealed from both parties. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources is an applied, peer-reviewed journal which aims to communicate the development and practice of the field of human resources within the Asia Pacific region. The journal publishes the results of research, theoretical and conceptual developments, and examples of current practice. The overall aim is to increase the understanding of the management of human resource in an organisational setting.
期刊最新文献
Fostering Work Engagement: The Effects of Reverse Mentoring and Knowledge Sharing Will Fun and Care Prevent Gig Workers' Withdrawal? A Moderated Mediation Model Correction to “Human Resource Flexibility and Employee Creativity: The Roles of Perceived HR Strength, Career Satisfaction, and Employer Brand” When and Why Does Platform Leadership Drive Employee Intrapreneurship? Moderating Role of Innovation-Oriented Human Resource Management Trade Unions and the British Industrial Relations CrisisBy Peter Ackers, New York and Abingdon-On-Thames, UK: Routledge, 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1