PERLINDUNGAN INVESTOR ASING DARI RISIKO SENGKETA MELALUI ARBITRASE SEBAGAI FORUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA INVESTASI

Eunike Pebria Purba
{"title":"PERLINDUNGAN INVESTOR ASING DARI RISIKO SENGKETA MELALUI ARBITRASE SEBAGAI FORUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA INVESTASI","authors":"Eunike Pebria Purba","doi":"10.24002/jep.v38i2.6599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In terms of investing in a country, one of the considerations of investors is related to the risk of disputes. This consideration is crucial, considering that the main goal of investors investing in a country is to make a profit. Based on these facts, a legal issue was found regarding what Indonesian legal instruments were formed to provide legal protection to foreign investors from the risk of disputes and how Arbitration as an Investment Dispute Resolution Forum provides legal protection to investors from the risk of disputes. The purpose of this research is to find out Indonesian legal instruments related to legal protection for foreign investors from the risk of disputes, and to find out the efficiency and effectiveness of arbitration as an investment dispute resolution forum in providing legal protection for foreign investors from the risk of disputes. This research uses normative juridical research methods. The conclusion of this study is that there are several juridical factors underlying the statement that arbitration arrangements in Indonesia have not been able to fully provide legal protection for foreign investors, including Indonesia is considered a country that is not friendly to foreign arbitral awards because it is considered easy to refuse the implementation of foreign arbitral awards with applying the principles of the State Act Doctrine which places State Owned Enterprise as a state that cannot be sued, the problem of choosing a forum due to arrangements that tend to favor one party, and there is a legal vacuum related to the time period for registering international arbitration. Arbitration in providing legal protection for foreign investors from the risk of foreign investment disputes in Indonesia by prioritizing the main matters in the form of the superiority of arbitration in the system, implementation, effectiveness and efficiency of the arbitration process, and the final arbitral award.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justitia Et Pax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v38i2.6599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In terms of investing in a country, one of the considerations of investors is related to the risk of disputes. This consideration is crucial, considering that the main goal of investors investing in a country is to make a profit. Based on these facts, a legal issue was found regarding what Indonesian legal instruments were formed to provide legal protection to foreign investors from the risk of disputes and how Arbitration as an Investment Dispute Resolution Forum provides legal protection to investors from the risk of disputes. The purpose of this research is to find out Indonesian legal instruments related to legal protection for foreign investors from the risk of disputes, and to find out the efficiency and effectiveness of arbitration as an investment dispute resolution forum in providing legal protection for foreign investors from the risk of disputes. This research uses normative juridical research methods. The conclusion of this study is that there are several juridical factors underlying the statement that arbitration arrangements in Indonesia have not been able to fully provide legal protection for foreign investors, including Indonesia is considered a country that is not friendly to foreign arbitral awards because it is considered easy to refuse the implementation of foreign arbitral awards with applying the principles of the State Act Doctrine which places State Owned Enterprise as a state that cannot be sued, the problem of choosing a forum due to arrangements that tend to favor one party, and there is a legal vacuum related to the time period for registering international arbitration. Arbitration in providing legal protection for foreign investors from the risk of foreign investment disputes in Indonesia by prioritizing the main matters in the form of the superiority of arbitration in the system, implementation, effectiveness and efficiency of the arbitration process, and the final arbitral award.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护外国投资者免受通过仲裁进行的争议论坛的风险
就投资一个国家而言,投资者的考虑因素之一与纠纷风险有关。考虑到投资者在一个国家投资的主要目标是盈利,这一点至关重要。根据这些事实,发现了一个法律问题,即印度尼西亚制定了哪些法律文书,为外国投资者提供法律保护,使其免受争端风险,以及仲裁作为一个投资争端解决论坛如何为投资者提供法律保护,使其免受争端风险。本研究的目的是找出印尼法律文书中有关保护外国投资者免于纠纷风险的法律,并找出仲裁作为一个投资纠纷解决论坛在为外国投资者免于纠纷风险提供法律保护方面的效率和有效性。本研究采用规范的法学研究方法。这项研究的结论是,印度尼西亚的仲裁安排未能充分为外国投资者提供法律保护,这一说法背后有几个法律因素。包括印度尼西亚在内的国家被认为是一个对外国仲裁裁决不友好的国家,因为它被认为很容易通过适用国家行为主义的原则来拒绝执行外国仲裁裁决,该原则将国有企业视为不能被起诉的国家,由于倾向于一方的安排而选择法院的问题,以及与注册国际仲裁的时间有关的法律真空。仲裁在为外国投资者提供法律保护,避免在印尼发生外商投资纠纷的风险方面,通过优先考虑仲裁的主要事项,体现了仲裁在制度、仲裁程序的执行、效力和效率以及最终仲裁裁决等方面的优越性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
PENGUATAN NORMA SYARAT DISPENSASI KAWIN DALAM UPAYA PENCEGAHAN PERKAWINAN ANAK BERDASARKAN PERSPEKTIF TEORI TUJUAN HUKUM REVIEWING THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ON DEMOCRATIC ELECTION PRACTICES IN INDONESIA AND THE PHILIPPINES PENYADAPAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA TERORISME DI INDONESIA DAN FILIPINA DITINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HAK ASASI MANUSIA REFORMULASI PENETRATION STRESS TEST SEBAGAI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DATA PRIBADI KONSUMEN DI ERA BISNIS DIGITAL TINJAUAN KRIMINOLOGIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN KERBAU DI WILAYAH HUKUM KEPOLISIAN RESOR SUMBA BARAT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1