Effects of New York City’s Neighborhood Policing Policy

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Police Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-10-09 DOI:10.1177/10986111211046991
Brenden Beck, Joseph Antonelli, Gabriela Piñeros
{"title":"Effects of New York City’s Neighborhood Policing Policy","authors":"Brenden Beck, Joseph Antonelli, Gabriela Piñeros","doi":"10.1177/10986111211046991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 2015 and 2018, New York City adopted “neighborhood policing,” an expansive policy to encourage interactions between police officers and community members. Among other changes, the initiative established hundreds of new “neighborhood-coordination” officers and gave “steady-sector” officers time away from 911 response to dedicate to resident interactions. This study evaluates the initiative’s effects on crime, complaints of police misconduct, racial disparities, and arrests. Using monthly data on New York City’s 76 police precincts between 2006 and 2019, we estimate the policy’s causal effect using high-dimensional time series models. This approach accounts for the policy’s staggered adoption, addresses potential correlation among outcomes and between precincts, and controls for unobserved precinct characteristics. We find neighborhood policing reduced misdemeanor and proactive arrests, especially in higher-poverty precincts outside of Manhattan, though it did not change the racial disparities of such arrests. The policy did not affect crime. It briefly increased complaints against police.","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"25 1","pages":"470 - 496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111211046991","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Between 2015 and 2018, New York City adopted “neighborhood policing,” an expansive policy to encourage interactions between police officers and community members. Among other changes, the initiative established hundreds of new “neighborhood-coordination” officers and gave “steady-sector” officers time away from 911 response to dedicate to resident interactions. This study evaluates the initiative’s effects on crime, complaints of police misconduct, racial disparities, and arrests. Using monthly data on New York City’s 76 police precincts between 2006 and 2019, we estimate the policy’s causal effect using high-dimensional time series models. This approach accounts for the policy’s staggered adoption, addresses potential correlation among outcomes and between precincts, and controls for unobserved precinct characteristics. We find neighborhood policing reduced misdemeanor and proactive arrests, especially in higher-poverty precincts outside of Manhattan, though it did not change the racial disparities of such arrests. The policy did not affect crime. It briefly increased complaints against police.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纽约市社区警务政策的效果
2015年至2018年期间,纽约市采取了“社区警务”政策,这是一项鼓励警察与社区成员之间互动的广泛政策。在其他变化中,该计划设立了数百名新的“社区协调”官员,并使“稳定部门”官员从911响应中抽出时间致力于居民互动。本研究评估了该倡议对犯罪、对警察不当行为的投诉、种族差异和逮捕的影响。利用2006年至2019年纽约市76个警察局的月度数据,我们使用高维时间序列模型估计了该政策的因果效应。这种方法解释了政策的交错采用,解决了结果之间和选区之间的潜在相关性,以及对未观察到的选区特征的控制。我们发现,社区警察减少了轻罪和主动逮捕,尤其是在曼哈顿以外的高贫困地区,尽管它并没有改变这类逮捕的种族差异。这项政策并没有影响犯罪。它短暂地增加了对警察的投诉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
期刊最新文献
Factors Promoting and Inhibiting Use of Wellness Resources Among Police: A Mixed Methods Study Law Enforcement-Based Outreach and Treatment Referral as a Response to Opioid Misuse: Assessing Reductions in Overdoses and Costs The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis Sergeant Coffee Needs You: Evaluation of a Police Officer Bystander Intervention Program An Examination of Unintentional Use of Force by the Police
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1