Comparing the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of PLA/Organosolv Lignin Biocomposites Made of Different Biomass for 3D Printing Applications

IF 1.5 4区 材料科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-transactions of The Asme Pub Date : 2021-11-05 DOI:10.1115/1.4052922
J. Obielodan, Maia Delwiche, D. Clark, Cassie Downing, Delanie Huntoon, Tsunghsueh Wu
{"title":"Comparing the Mechanical and Thermal Properties of PLA/Organosolv Lignin Biocomposites Made of Different Biomass for 3D Printing Applications","authors":"J. Obielodan, Maia Delwiche, D. Clark, Cassie Downing, Delanie Huntoon, Tsunghsueh Wu","doi":"10.1115/1.4052922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This work investigates the differences in mechanical and thermal properties of polylactic acid (PLA)/lignin biocomposites made of four different unmodified organosolv lignin materials, three of which were extracted from different woody biomass (maple, oak, and pine) in-house, and one sourced commercially. Filaments made from blends of 30wt% and 40wt% of the in-house lignin and the commercially sourced lignin as fillers in PLA were used to 3D-print experimental test samples using fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mechanical properties based on tension testing and Izod impact testing, while differences in thermal properties based on differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis were less significant. Test samples with 30wt% lignin had tensile strengths that were higher than those of 40wt% lignin. Among the three in-house extracted lignin from the woody biomass resources, maple-based composites consistently yielded the highest tensile strengths while oak-based materials yielded the highest stiffness in tension testing and the most stability in impact resistance. The pine-based materials showed the most decline in strengths between 30wt% and 40wt% lignin loadings. The commercially obtained lignin at 30wt% and pine-based lignin at 40wt% yielded much higher percent elongations at failure than all other materials. This study demonstrates the influence of lignin biomass resources and their concentrations on the properties and performances of 3D printed specimens.","PeriodicalId":15700,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-transactions of The Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4052922","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This work investigates the differences in mechanical and thermal properties of polylactic acid (PLA)/lignin biocomposites made of four different unmodified organosolv lignin materials, three of which were extracted from different woody biomass (maple, oak, and pine) in-house, and one sourced commercially. Filaments made from blends of 30wt% and 40wt% of the in-house lignin and the commercially sourced lignin as fillers in PLA were used to 3D-print experimental test samples using fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. Statistically significant differences were observed in the mechanical properties based on tension testing and Izod impact testing, while differences in thermal properties based on differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetric (TGA) analysis were less significant. Test samples with 30wt% lignin had tensile strengths that were higher than those of 40wt% lignin. Among the three in-house extracted lignin from the woody biomass resources, maple-based composites consistently yielded the highest tensile strengths while oak-based materials yielded the highest stiffness in tension testing and the most stability in impact resistance. The pine-based materials showed the most decline in strengths between 30wt% and 40wt% lignin loadings. The commercially obtained lignin at 30wt% and pine-based lignin at 40wt% yielded much higher percent elongations at failure than all other materials. This study demonstrates the influence of lignin biomass resources and their concentrations on the properties and performances of 3D printed specimens.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
3D打印用不同生物质制备的聚乳酸/有机溶质木质素生物复合材料的力学和热性能比较
本工作研究了由四种不同的未改性有机溶剂木质素材料制成的聚乳酸(PLA)/木质素生物复合材料的机械和热性能差异,其中三种材料是从不同的木质生物质(枫树、橡树和松树)中提取的,一种材料是商业来源的。由30wt%和40wt%的内部木质素和商业来源的木质素的混合物制成的纤维作为PLA中的填料,用于使用熔融纤维制造(FFF)工艺3D打印实验测试样品。基于张力测试和Izod冲击测试,在机械性能方面观察到统计学上的显著差异,而基于差示扫描量热法(DSC)和热重分析(TGA)的热性能差异则不那么显著。具有30wt%木质素的测试样品具有比具有40wt%木质素更高的拉伸强度。在从木质生物质资源中提取的三种内部木质素中,枫木基复合材料始终具有最高的拉伸强度,而橡木基材料在拉伸测试中具有最高的刚度和最稳定的抗冲击性。松基材料在木质素负载量为30wt%至40wt%之间的强度下降幅度最大。商业获得的30wt%的木质素和40wt%的松基木质素在失效时产生的伸长率比所有其他材料高得多。本研究证明了木质素生物质资源及其浓度对3D打印样品性能的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Multiscale characterization, modeling, and experiments; High-temperature creep, fatigue, and fracture; Elastic-plastic behavior; Environmental effects on material response, constitutive relations, materials processing, and microstructure mechanical property relationships
期刊最新文献
Effect of Build Geometry and Porosity in Additively Manufactured CuCrZr Influence of Multiple Modifications on the Fatigue Behavior of Bitumen and Asphalt Mixtures High Temperature Tensile and Compressive Behaviors of Nanostructured Polycrystalline AlCoCrFeNi High Entropy Alloy: A Molecular Dynamics Study Simulation of Pitting Corrosion Under Stress Based on Cellular Automata and Finite Element Method Corrosion Behavior of 20G Steel in Saline (Na2SO4) Circumstances at High Temperature/Pressure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1