Setting Sail with the Rome I Regulation, Article 5 and Cross-Border Contracts of Carriage

Q2 Social Sciences Lex Portus Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.26886/2524-101x.9.2.2023.1
Xhon Skënderi, Sara Vora (Hoxha)
{"title":"Setting Sail with the Rome I Regulation, Article 5 and Cross-Border Contracts of Carriage","authors":"Xhon Skënderi, Sara Vora (Hoxha)","doi":"10.26886/2524-101x.9.2.2023.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present research paper offers an all-encompassing examination of Article 5 of the Rome I Regulation, a pivotal component of the European Union’s private international law. The article centres its attention on the influence of Article 5 on contracts of carriage, a crucial element of global commerce. The objective of the research is to offer a comprehensive comprehension of the legislative framework and fundamental attributes of the Rome I Regulation. The regulation’s primary objective is to facilitate predictability and legal assurance in cross-border transactions. This article critically examines the complexities of Article 5, encompassing its extent, conditions, and exceptions, and further explores its importance for international transportation agreements. This study analyses the function of Article 5 in ascertaining the applicable law in instances of conflicts between parties from diverse legal systems, with specific emphasis on multimodal transportation and the notion of “the place of delivery”. The present article assesses the influence of the legal rulings of the European Court of Justice on the construal and implementation of Article 5. The research presented here delineates several pragmatic impediments and limitations that emerge during the execution of Article 5, encompassing possible contradictions with other international accords, complexities in ascertaining the site of delivery, and the impact of obligatory legal statutes. Notwithstanding the aforementioned challenges, the study concludes that Article 5 has been instrumental in fostering legal certainty, facilitating the performance of international carriage contracts, and propelling worldwide trade. The present study’s outcomes augment the extant corpus of literature on the Rome I Regulation and furnish significant perspectives for policymakers, legal professionals, and academicians. The article emphasises the necessity for additional examination and evaluation of the obstacles and possibilities posed by Article 5 within the framework of global commerce and transportation agreements.","PeriodicalId":36374,"journal":{"name":"Lex Portus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Portus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.9.2.2023.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present research paper offers an all-encompassing examination of Article 5 of the Rome I Regulation, a pivotal component of the European Union’s private international law. The article centres its attention on the influence of Article 5 on contracts of carriage, a crucial element of global commerce. The objective of the research is to offer a comprehensive comprehension of the legislative framework and fundamental attributes of the Rome I Regulation. The regulation’s primary objective is to facilitate predictability and legal assurance in cross-border transactions. This article critically examines the complexities of Article 5, encompassing its extent, conditions, and exceptions, and further explores its importance for international transportation agreements. This study analyses the function of Article 5 in ascertaining the applicable law in instances of conflicts between parties from diverse legal systems, with specific emphasis on multimodal transportation and the notion of “the place of delivery”. The present article assesses the influence of the legal rulings of the European Court of Justice on the construal and implementation of Article 5. The research presented here delineates several pragmatic impediments and limitations that emerge during the execution of Article 5, encompassing possible contradictions with other international accords, complexities in ascertaining the site of delivery, and the impact of obligatory legal statutes. Notwithstanding the aforementioned challenges, the study concludes that Article 5 has been instrumental in fostering legal certainty, facilitating the performance of international carriage contracts, and propelling worldwide trade. The present study’s outcomes augment the extant corpus of literature on the Rome I Regulation and furnish significant perspectives for policymakers, legal professionals, and academicians. The article emphasises the necessity for additional examination and evaluation of the obstacles and possibilities posed by Article 5 within the framework of global commerce and transportation agreements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《罗马一号条例》、第5条和跨境运输合同
本研究文件全面审查了《罗马一号条例》第5条,这是欧洲联盟国际私法的一个关键组成部分。该条集中注意第5条对运输合同的影响,运输合同是全球商业的一个关键要素。本研究的目的是全面了解《罗马一号条例》的立法框架和基本属性。该条例的主要目标是促进跨境交易的可预测性和法律保障。本文严格审查了第5条的复杂性,包括其范围、条件和例外情况,并进一步探讨了其对国际运输协议的重要性。本研究分析了第5条在不同法律制度的当事方之间发生冲突时确定适用法律的作用,特别强调多式联运和“交货地”的概念。本文评估了欧洲法院的法律裁决对第5条的解释和执行的影响。本文介绍的研究阐述了在执行第5条过程中出现的几个实际障碍和局限性,包括与其他国际协定可能存在的矛盾、确定交货地点的复杂性以及强制性法律法规的影响。尽管存在上述挑战,研究报告得出结论,第5条在促进法律确定性、促进国际运输合同的履行和推动全球贸易方面发挥了重要作用。本研究的成果扩充了《罗马一号条例》的现有文献库,并为决策者、法律专业人士和学者提供了重要的视角。该条强调,有必要在全球商业和运输协定的框架内,进一步审查和评估第5条所造成的障碍和可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lex Portus
Lex Portus Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Parallel Imports: Striking a Delicate Balance in a Multifaceted Environment Potential Influence of Article 6(1)(b) of the Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Commercial Contracts on Indian Private International Law Ukrainian Supreme Court Judicial Practice in Cases Arising from Disputes between Foreign Shipowners or Protection and Indemnity Clubs, and Seafarers or Seafarers’ Next of Kin India’s Submission to the ITLOS Climate Change Advisory Opinion: A Lost Opportunity Ukraine – China Asymmetric Economic Power Relations: What is to Come after BRI?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1