Social Value Chains: A New Organizational Framework for Studies on State-Society Relations in China

IF 0.7 Q4 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION Chinese Public Administration Review Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.22140/cpar.v9i1.152
Jun Han, Ji Ma, Z. Wang
{"title":"Social Value Chains: A New Organizational Framework for Studies on State-Society Relations in China","authors":"Jun Han, Ji Ma, Z. Wang","doi":"10.22140/cpar.v9i1.152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past three decades, many studies have emerged to conceptualize the changing state-society relations in China. Yet, less attention has been paid to what kinds of social sector organizations these competing or conflicting studies were empirically examining. This lack of a synthesis of the organizational foundations of these studies has resulted in fragmentation and weak generalization of the arguments on Chinese state-society relations. To address this issue, this article systematically reviews the organizational bases in the extant literature on the Chinese state-society relations. It then constructs an inclusive organizational framework, social value chains (SVCs), for future research by combining two mainstream organizational forms in extant research with two understudied organizational types. This new organizational framework includes four types of social sector organizations: infrastructure organizations, financial organizations, support organizations, and operating organizations. This article concludes by revealing potential applications of the new organizational framework to guide future research on state-society relations in China.","PeriodicalId":41625,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Public Administration Review","volume":"9 1","pages":"55 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22140/cpar.v9i1.152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In the past three decades, many studies have emerged to conceptualize the changing state-society relations in China. Yet, less attention has been paid to what kinds of social sector organizations these competing or conflicting studies were empirically examining. This lack of a synthesis of the organizational foundations of these studies has resulted in fragmentation and weak generalization of the arguments on Chinese state-society relations. To address this issue, this article systematically reviews the organizational bases in the extant literature on the Chinese state-society relations. It then constructs an inclusive organizational framework, social value chains (SVCs), for future research by combining two mainstream organizational forms in extant research with two understudied organizational types. This new organizational framework includes four types of social sector organizations: infrastructure organizations, financial organizations, support organizations, and operating organizations. This article concludes by revealing potential applications of the new organizational framework to guide future research on state-society relations in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会价值链:中国国家与社会关系研究的新组织框架
在过去的三十年里,出现了许多研究来概念化中国不断变化的国家社会关系。然而,人们对这些相互竞争或相互冲突的研究所实证检验的社会部门组织的种类关注较少。由于缺乏对这些研究的组织基础的综合,导致了关于中国国家社会关系的争论的碎片化和弱概括性。为了解决这一问题,本文系统地回顾了现存关于中国国家与社会关系的文献中的组织基础。然后,通过将现有研究中的两种主流组织形式与两种研究不足的组织类型相结合,构建了一个包容性的组织框架,即社会价值链(SVCs),以供未来的研究。这个新的组织框架包括四种类型的社会部门组织:基础设施组织、金融组织、支持组织和运营组织。本文最后揭示了新组织框架的潜在应用,以指导未来中国国家社会关系的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Public Administration Review
Chinese Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Taking sustainable energy seriously: A typological approach to sustainable energy governance in the U.S. states Do public service motivation and organizational processes influence job satisfaction and organizational commitment? A comparative study in public and private organizations Does performance management system implementation reduce fragmentation in an Indonesian local government? Productive entities and citation patterns of highly cited papers in public administration domain: An informetric profile How network resources empower expert involvement? Evidence from urban planning decision-making in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1