Book Review: Anandita Mukhopadhyay, Children’s Games Adults Gambit: From Vidyasagar to Satyajit Ray

Q3 Social Sciences Contemporary Education Dialogue Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/0973184919890459
Ananya Pathak
{"title":"Book Review: Anandita Mukhopadhyay, Children’s Games Adults Gambit: From Vidyasagar to Satyajit Ray","authors":"Ananya Pathak","doi":"10.1177/0973184919890459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"be it now or earlier, which decides what knowledge is worth transmitting. The author does not mince words when describing the current state of Indian politics and its effects on education, namely the dominance of what he calls Hindu nationalist historiography. In Ten Lectures, the writer has demonstrated his ability to weave together philosophy with practice. The style is conversational, liberally interspersed with accessible examples. However, there is a tendency towards narrating anecdotes, a strategy that engages listeners during lectures but when used too often is distracting for readers. Even with these drawbacks, students of sociology who are interested in education and those in the field of education who wish to question the norm will find it useful. The book was written about two years ago and in the course of these two years, several of the issues raised in the book such as religious nationalism or gap between skill and liberal education have become starker. Education is often based on promoting conformity, consensus and avoiding conflict. In its extreme form today, it has reached a point where any sort of questioning is labelled ‘anti-national’, where space is not given to repressed sections. The book warns that this attitude is not exclusive to the dominant ideology today, it is a trap in which other ideologies have fallen before and continue to fall; we need to ask ourselves why it is so if we want to move towards an enlightened society.","PeriodicalId":37486,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Education Dialogue","volume":"17 1","pages":"100 - 104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0973184919890459","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Education Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0973184919890459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

be it now or earlier, which decides what knowledge is worth transmitting. The author does not mince words when describing the current state of Indian politics and its effects on education, namely the dominance of what he calls Hindu nationalist historiography. In Ten Lectures, the writer has demonstrated his ability to weave together philosophy with practice. The style is conversational, liberally interspersed with accessible examples. However, there is a tendency towards narrating anecdotes, a strategy that engages listeners during lectures but when used too often is distracting for readers. Even with these drawbacks, students of sociology who are interested in education and those in the field of education who wish to question the norm will find it useful. The book was written about two years ago and in the course of these two years, several of the issues raised in the book such as religious nationalism or gap between skill and liberal education have become starker. Education is often based on promoting conformity, consensus and avoiding conflict. In its extreme form today, it has reached a point where any sort of questioning is labelled ‘anti-national’, where space is not given to repressed sections. The book warns that this attitude is not exclusive to the dominant ideology today, it is a trap in which other ideologies have fallen before and continue to fall; we need to ask ourselves why it is so if we want to move towards an enlightened society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
书评:Anandita Mukhopadhyay,《儿童游戏成人策略:从Vidyasagar到Satyajit Ray》
是现在还是更早,这决定了什么知识值得传播。作者在描述印度当前的政治状况及其对教育的影响(即他所谓的印度教民族主义史学的主导地位)时,毫不讳言。在《十讲》中,作者展示了他将哲学与实践相结合的能力。它的风格是对话式的,大量地穿插着通俗易懂的例子。然而,有一种讲轶事的趋势,这种策略在讲课时能吸引听众,但如果使用得太频繁,就会分散读者的注意力。即使有这些缺点,对教育感兴趣的社会学学生和希望质疑规范的教育领域的学生也会发现它很有用。这本书是两年前写的,在这两年里,书中提出的宗教民族主义、技能教育与人文教育的差距等问题变得更加突出。教育往往建立在促进一致性、共识和避免冲突的基础上。在今天的极端形式中,它已经达到了一个地步,任何形式的质疑都被贴上“反民族”的标签,不给受压迫的部分空间。这本书警告说,这种态度并不是今天占主导地位的意识形态所独有的,它是一个陷阱,其他意识形态以前就掉进了这个陷阱,而且还在继续掉进这个陷阱;如果我们想要走向一个开明的社会,我们需要问自己为什么会这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Contemporary Education Dialogue
Contemporary Education Dialogue Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Contemporary Education Dialogue serves as an independent open forum for researchers and practitioners to sustain a critical engagement with issues in education by engendering a reflective space that nurtures the discipline and promotes inter-disciplinary perspectives. The peer-reviewed journal allows for a refinement of theoretical and practical basis for improving the quality of education, furthering the opportunity to directly create reflective classroom practices. It invites contributions by academicians, policy-makers and practitioners on various topics related to education, particularly elementary education. Discussions and responses to published articles are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Understanding Graphical Literacy Using School Students’ Comprehension Strategies Social Science Teacher? Anyone 
Can Become’: Examining 
Professional Subject Identity of Social Science Teachers in India Feminist Pedagogy in Women’s Studies Classrooms: Some Critical Reflections Language as a Tool for Inclusive and Equitable School Education: A Critical Review of NEP 2020 New Education Policy and Higher Education Reforms in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1