What do unit root tests tell us about unemployment hysteresis in transition economies?

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Applied Economic Analysis Pub Date : 2020-10-26 DOI:10.1108/aea-05-2020-0048
Ebru Caglayan Akay, Zamira Oskonbaeva, Hoseng Bulbul
{"title":"What do unit root tests tell us about unemployment hysteresis in transition economies?","authors":"Ebru Caglayan Akay, Zamira Oskonbaeva, Hoseng Bulbul","doi":"10.1108/aea-05-2020-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the hysteresis hypothesis in unemployment using monthly data from 13 countries in transition.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nStationarity in the unemployment rate of selected transition economies was analyzed using four different group unit root tests, namely, linear, structural breaks, non-linear and structural breaks and non-linear.\n\n\nFindings\nThe empirical results show that the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis is valid for the majority of transition economies, including Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, the Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovenia. However, the results strongly reject the null hypothesis of unemployment hysteresis for the Kazakhstan and the Slovak Republics.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study revealed that, for countries in transition, advanced unit root tests exhibit greater validity when compared to standard tests\n","PeriodicalId":36191,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economic Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/aea-05-2020-0048","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economic Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aea-05-2020-0048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the hysteresis hypothesis in unemployment using monthly data from 13 countries in transition. Design/methodology/approach Stationarity in the unemployment rate of selected transition economies was analyzed using four different group unit root tests, namely, linear, structural breaks, non-linear and structural breaks and non-linear. Findings The empirical results show that the unemployment hysteresis hypothesis is valid for the majority of transition economies, including Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, the Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania and Slovenia. However, the results strongly reject the null hypothesis of unemployment hysteresis for the Kazakhstan and the Slovak Republics. Originality/value This study revealed that, for countries in transition, advanced unit root tests exhibit greater validity when compared to standard tests
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单位根检验告诉我们转型经济体的失业滞后性是什么?
本研究旨在利用13个转型国家的月度数据来检验失业的滞后假说。设计/方法/方法采用四种不同的组单位根检验,即线性、结构断裂、非线性和结构断裂以及非线性,分析了选定转型经济体失业率的平稳性。实证结果表明,失业滞后假说适用于大多数转型经济体,包括保加利亚、克罗地亚、捷克共和国、爱沙尼亚、匈牙利、吉尔吉斯共和国、拉脱维亚、立陶宛、波兰、罗马尼亚和斯洛文尼亚。然而,结果强烈反对哈萨克斯坦和斯洛伐克共和国失业滞后的零假设。独创性/价值本研究表明,在转型期国家,先进单位根检验比标准检验更有效
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economic Analysis
Applied Economic Analysis Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Editorial introduction: Studies about the impact of recent economic crises Inequality and redistribution: evidence from Scandinavian and Mediterranean countries Investigation into the dynamic relationships between global economic uncertainty and price volatilities of commodities, raw materials, and energy The impact of unanticipated wealth effects on consumption: evidence from Spanish panel data Determinants of the willingness to pay and willingness to accept in the valuation of informal care. The CUIDARSE study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1