Metadata as a Methodological Commons: From Aboutness Description to Cognitive Modeling

IF 1.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Data Intelligence Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1162/dint_a_00189
Wei Liu, Yaming Fu, Qianqian Liu
{"title":"Metadata as a Methodological Commons: From Aboutness Description to Cognitive Modeling","authors":"Wei Liu, Yaming Fu, Qianqian Liu","doi":"10.1162/dint_a_00189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Metadata is data about data, which is generated mainly for resources organization and description, facilitating finding, identifying, selecting and obtaining information①. With the advancement of technologies, the acquisition of metadata has gradually become a critical step in data modeling and function operation, which leads to the formation of its methodological commons. A series of general operations has been developed to achieve structured description, semantic encoding and machine-understandable information, including entity definition, relation description, object analysis, attribute extraction, ontology modeling, data cleaning, disambiguation, alignment, mapping, relating, enriching, importing, exporting, service implementation, registry and discovery, monitoring etc. Those operations are not only necessary elements in semantic technologies (including linked data) and knowledge graph technology, but has also developed into the common operation and primary strategy in building independent and knowledge-based information systems. In this paper, a series of metadata-related methods are collectively referred to as ‘metadata methodological commons’, which has a lot of best practices reflected in the various standard specifications of the Semantic Web. In the future construction of a multi-modal metaverse based on Web 3.0, it shall play an important role, for example, in building digital twins through adopting knowledge models, or supporting the modeling of the entire virtual world, etc. Manual-based description and coding obviously cannot adapted to the UGC (User Generated Contents) and AIGC (AI Generated Contents)-based content production in the metaverse era. The automatic processing of semantic formalization must be considered as a sure way to adapt metadata methodological commons to meet the future needs of AI era.","PeriodicalId":34023,"journal":{"name":"Data Intelligence","volume":"5 1","pages":"289-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Data Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00189","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Metadata is data about data, which is generated mainly for resources organization and description, facilitating finding, identifying, selecting and obtaining information①. With the advancement of technologies, the acquisition of metadata has gradually become a critical step in data modeling and function operation, which leads to the formation of its methodological commons. A series of general operations has been developed to achieve structured description, semantic encoding and machine-understandable information, including entity definition, relation description, object analysis, attribute extraction, ontology modeling, data cleaning, disambiguation, alignment, mapping, relating, enriching, importing, exporting, service implementation, registry and discovery, monitoring etc. Those operations are not only necessary elements in semantic technologies (including linked data) and knowledge graph technology, but has also developed into the common operation and primary strategy in building independent and knowledge-based information systems. In this paper, a series of metadata-related methods are collectively referred to as ‘metadata methodological commons’, which has a lot of best practices reflected in the various standard specifications of the Semantic Web. In the future construction of a multi-modal metaverse based on Web 3.0, it shall play an important role, for example, in building digital twins through adopting knowledge models, or supporting the modeling of the entire virtual world, etc. Manual-based description and coding obviously cannot adapted to the UGC (User Generated Contents) and AIGC (AI Generated Contents)-based content production in the metaverse era. The automatic processing of semantic formalization must be considered as a sure way to adapt metadata methodological commons to meet the future needs of AI era.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
元数据作为一种方法论共享:从能力描述到认知建模
元数据是关于数据的数据,主要是为了组织和描述资源而产生的,便于查找、识别、选择和获取信息①。随着技术的进步,元数据的获取逐渐成为数据建模和功能操作的关键步骤,并导致其方法论公域的形成。为了实现结构化描述、语义编码和机器可理解的信息,开发了一系列通用操作,包括实体定义、关系描述、对象分析、属性提取、本体建模、数据清理、消歧、对齐、映射、关联、丰富、导入、导出、服务实现、注册和发现、监控等。这些操作不仅是语义技术(包括关联数据)和知识图谱技术的必要元素,而且已经发展成为构建独立的、基于知识的信息系统的通用操作和主要策略。在本文中,一系列与元数据相关的方法被统称为“元数据方法公共”,在语义Web的各种标准规范中反映了许多最佳实践。在未来基于Web 3.0的多模态元世界的构建中,它将发挥重要的作用,例如通过采用知识模型构建数字孪生,或者支持整个虚拟世界的建模等。基于手工的描述和编码显然不适应元宇宙时代基于UGC (User Generated Contents)和AIGC (AI Generated Contents)的内容生产。语义形式化的自动处理是适应未来人工智能时代需要的元数据方法共性的必然选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Data Intelligence
Data Intelligence COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Limitations and Ethical Considerations of ChatGPT Rule Mining Trends from 1987 to 2022: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization Classification and quantification of timestamp data quality issues and its impact on data quality outcome BIKAS: Bio-Inspired Knowledge Acquisition and Simulacrum—A Knowledge Database to Support Multifunctional Design Concept Generation Exploring Attentive Siamese LSTM for Low-Resource Text Plagiarism Detection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1