On the Uncertainty Caused by the Referendum on Brexit

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Applied Economics Quarterly Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.3790/AEQ.66.2.145
Christian R. Richter, S. Roy-Mukherjee
{"title":"On the Uncertainty Caused by the Referendum on Brexit","authors":"Christian R. Richter, S. Roy-Mukherjee","doi":"10.3790/AEQ.66.2.145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we investigate “the” uncertainty caused by the 2016 Brexit referendum. In particular, we analyse whether the referendum in itself had a noticeable impact on expectations/behaviour of market participants. To investigate this, we analyse two survey-based indicators and a financial variable, namely the consumer confidence index, the economic policy uncertainty index and the GBP/Euro exchange rate. In the first step we estimate the law of motion of these variables using a state-space model in the time domain. In the second step, we transfer these results into the frequency domain. We find that certain indicators changed very soon after the referendum whilst other indicators reacted to the referendum by changing their medium and long-term behaviour. For those variables it is clear that the short-term reaction to any shock is fairly limited leading to the wrong conclusion that the referendum did not have any impact on them. In fact, the impact will only be seen much later than the original shock. In the opposite case, the wrong conclusion is that the reaction to the referendum is only visible in the short term, but not in the long-run. Therefore, we highlight that the dynamics caused by the referendum are of complex nature which may yet have to materialise. That implies that negative consequences of the referendum alone (never mind the actual Brexit) will only become visible well after the referendum by which time they may not be associated with the referendum anymore. However, we also show that there are short term consequences of the referendum.","PeriodicalId":36978,"journal":{"name":"Applied Economics Quarterly","volume":"66 1","pages":"145-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Economics Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/AEQ.66.2.145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we investigate “the” uncertainty caused by the 2016 Brexit referendum. In particular, we analyse whether the referendum in itself had a noticeable impact on expectations/behaviour of market participants. To investigate this, we analyse two survey-based indicators and a financial variable, namely the consumer confidence index, the economic policy uncertainty index and the GBP/Euro exchange rate. In the first step we estimate the law of motion of these variables using a state-space model in the time domain. In the second step, we transfer these results into the frequency domain. We find that certain indicators changed very soon after the referendum whilst other indicators reacted to the referendum by changing their medium and long-term behaviour. For those variables it is clear that the short-term reaction to any shock is fairly limited leading to the wrong conclusion that the referendum did not have any impact on them. In fact, the impact will only be seen much later than the original shock. In the opposite case, the wrong conclusion is that the reaction to the referendum is only visible in the short term, but not in the long-run. Therefore, we highlight that the dynamics caused by the referendum are of complex nature which may yet have to materialise. That implies that negative consequences of the referendum alone (never mind the actual Brexit) will only become visible well after the referendum by which time they may not be associated with the referendum anymore. However, we also show that there are short term consequences of the referendum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论英国脱欧公投带来的不确定性
本文研究了2016年英国脱欧公投带来的“不确定性”。特别是,我们分析了公投本身是否对市场参与者的预期/行为产生了显著影响。为了研究这一点,我们分析了两个基于调查的指标和一个金融变量,即消费者信心指数、经济政策不确定性指数和英镑/欧元汇率。在第一步中,我们使用时域的状态空间模型来估计这些变量的运动规律。在第二步中,我们将这些结果转移到频域。我们发现,某些指标在公投后很快就发生了变化,而其他指标则通过改变其中期和长期行为对公投做出反应。对于这些变量,很明显,对任何冲击的短期反应都相当有限,导致人们错误地得出全民公决对他们没有任何影响的结论。事实上,这种冲击只会比最初的冲击晚得多。在相反的情况下,错误的结论是,对公投的反应只在短期内可见,而不是长期可见。因此,我们强调,公民投票造成的动态是复杂的,可能还必须实现。这意味着,公投本身的负面影响(更不用说实际的英国脱欧了)只有在公投之后才会显现出来,到那时,它们可能不再与公投联系在一起。然而,我们也显示了公投的短期后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Economics Quarterly
Applied Economics Quarterly Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social and Solidarity Economy in Morocco: Cooperatives’ Behavior and Growth Exchange Rate Pass-Through, Inflation, and Monetary Policy in Egypt Do Fiscal Regimes Matter for Fiscal Sustainability in South Africa? A Markov-Switching Approach Designing GDP-Linked Bonds with Default Industrial Output Growth Forecast: A Machine Learning Approach Based on Cross-Validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1