Implications of the Digital Economy on Merger Control in Pakistan and China: Policy Implications for Pakistan

Yuhui Wang, S. Mushtaq
{"title":"Implications of the Digital Economy on Merger Control in Pakistan and China: Policy Implications for Pakistan","authors":"Yuhui Wang, S. Mushtaq","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v15n1p40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rise of the digital economy has challenged the foundation of competition law frameworks the world over. Today, the antitrust doctrine finds itself confronting a new economy; an econo-my wherein data acts as a currency, markets are without prices, market collisions are based on algorithms, and the market is ‘infinite’. Several jurisdictions such as Germany, Austria, and China have developed new regulations or amended existing legislations to confront the chal-lenges presented by the digital economy. A dearth of theoretical and empirical literature has evaluated whether digital markets are so fundamentally different as to require a different set of rules. Of specific interest to this paper is whether current competition rules are sufficient to deal with mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in digital markets. This paper assesses M&A regulations in China and Pakistan in light of the new digital economy. Expert interviews were conducted using semi-structured interviews to investigate the comparisons between Pakistan’s and China’s merger control regimes. The findings indicate that China’s merger control regulations are better adopted for the digital economy than Pakistani’s. It also sets out the policy implications for competition policy makers in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":90619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of politics and law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of politics and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v15n1p40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The rise of the digital economy has challenged the foundation of competition law frameworks the world over. Today, the antitrust doctrine finds itself confronting a new economy; an econo-my wherein data acts as a currency, markets are without prices, market collisions are based on algorithms, and the market is ‘infinite’. Several jurisdictions such as Germany, Austria, and China have developed new regulations or amended existing legislations to confront the chal-lenges presented by the digital economy. A dearth of theoretical and empirical literature has evaluated whether digital markets are so fundamentally different as to require a different set of rules. Of specific interest to this paper is whether current competition rules are sufficient to deal with mergers and acquisitions (M&As) in digital markets. This paper assesses M&A regulations in China and Pakistan in light of the new digital economy. Expert interviews were conducted using semi-structured interviews to investigate the comparisons between Pakistan’s and China’s merger control regimes. The findings indicate that China’s merger control regulations are better adopted for the digital economy than Pakistani’s. It also sets out the policy implications for competition policy makers in Pakistan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字经济对巴基斯坦和中国并购控制的影响:对巴基斯坦的政策启示
数字经济的崛起挑战了世界各地竞争法框架的基础。今天,反垄断原则发现自己面对的是一个新的经济;在这个经济体中,数据就像货币一样,市场没有价格,市场冲突是基于算法的,市场是“无限的”。德国、奥地利和中国等几个司法管辖区已经制定了新的法规或修改了现有立法,以应对数字经济带来的挑战。缺乏理论和实证文献来评估数字市场是否存在根本性差异,以至于需要一套不同的规则。本文特别感兴趣的是,当前的竞争规则是否足以处理数字市场中的并购(M&As)。本文对新数字经济背景下中国和巴基斯坦的并购监管进行了评估。专家访谈采用半结构化访谈进行,以调查巴基斯坦和中国合并控制制度的比较。研究结果表明,与巴基斯坦相比,中国的并购控制法规更适用于数字经济。它还阐述了对巴基斯坦竞争政策制定者的政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Examination of Political Patronage and Maladministration on State-Owned Entities with Specific Reference to South African Airways: A Literature Study Integration Process in Central Asia: The Interaction of Nationalism and Regionalism Majority Voting – A Critique Preferential Decision-Making – An Alternative Contrariness of Laws in Contractual Obligations and the Role of the Will in Determining the Applicable Law in the Jordanian Civil Law Ghana's Legal Framework for the Constitutional and Statutory Application of Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1