Practicing for Death in the Anthropocene

IF 1.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Environmental Humanities Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1215/22011919-10422311
Hjördis Becker-Lindenthal, Simone Kotva
{"title":"Practicing for Death in the Anthropocene","authors":"Hjördis Becker-Lindenthal, Simone Kotva","doi":"10.1215/22011919-10422311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article analyzes the theme of practicing for death as it has emerged in recent environmental discourse. In the first part, it situates Roy Scranton’s Learning to Die in the Anthropocene (2015) in the context of new critical approaches to death and asceticism, especially Peter Sloterdijk’s You Must Change Your Life: On Anthropotechnics (2013). In the second part, it offers an environmental reading of the “remembrance of death” as it appears in John Climacus’s influential seventh-century manual, The Ladder of Divine Ascent. Here, the authors build on Sloterdijk’s remarks on Climacus while developing Sloterdijk’s analysis substantially, drawing (in part three) on ecotheological readings of Byzantine asceticism to elucidate Climacus’s environmental practice. The authors argue that what is at stake in the remembrance of death is the death not of the self but of a perception of the self that valorizes the self-possessed subject. In the final part, they compare the death of specific self-images in Christian asceticism to the death of the human qua self-possessed subject in the posthumanist ethics of Rosi Braidotti. At the same time, the authors see Climacus as deepening positions sketched out in Braidotti’s posthumanism and providing a critical perspective on the idea of resigning from care.","PeriodicalId":46497,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Humanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-10422311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyzes the theme of practicing for death as it has emerged in recent environmental discourse. In the first part, it situates Roy Scranton’s Learning to Die in the Anthropocene (2015) in the context of new critical approaches to death and asceticism, especially Peter Sloterdijk’s You Must Change Your Life: On Anthropotechnics (2013). In the second part, it offers an environmental reading of the “remembrance of death” as it appears in John Climacus’s influential seventh-century manual, The Ladder of Divine Ascent. Here, the authors build on Sloterdijk’s remarks on Climacus while developing Sloterdijk’s analysis substantially, drawing (in part three) on ecotheological readings of Byzantine asceticism to elucidate Climacus’s environmental practice. The authors argue that what is at stake in the remembrance of death is the death not of the self but of a perception of the self that valorizes the self-possessed subject. In the final part, they compare the death of specific self-images in Christian asceticism to the death of the human qua self-possessed subject in the posthumanist ethics of Rosi Braidotti. At the same time, the authors see Climacus as deepening positions sketched out in Braidotti’s posthumanism and providing a critical perspective on the idea of resigning from care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为人类世的死亡而修行
本文分析了实践死亡的主题,因为它已经出现在最近的环境话语。在第一部分中,它将罗伊·斯克兰顿的《在人类世中学习死亡》(2015)置于对死亡和禁欲主义的新批判方法的背景下,特别是彼得·斯洛特戴克的《你必须改变你的生活:关于人类技术》(2013)。在第二部分,它提供了一个环境的阅读“死亡的记忆”,因为它出现在约翰克里马库斯的影响力七世纪的手册,神圣的阶梯上升。在这里,作者以斯洛特戴克对克里马库斯的评论为基础,同时实质性地发展了斯洛特戴克的分析,(在第三部分中)利用拜占庭禁欲主义的生态神学解读来阐明克里马库斯的环境实践。作者认为,对死亡的记忆所面临的危险不是自我的死亡,而是对自我的感知的死亡,这种感知使自我拥有的主体得到了肯定。在最后一部分,他们比较了基督教禁欲主义中特定自我形象的死亡与罗西·布雷多蒂后人道主义伦理学中人类自我主体的死亡。与此同时,作者认为克里马库斯深化了布雷多蒂的后人文主义的立场,并提供了一种从关怀中辞职的批判性观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Humanities
Environmental Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
32
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Beyond an Environmental “Hermeneutics of Suspicion” Communicating with Plants Narrating Extinctions for Survivance Maroon Anti-necropolitics Offsetting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1