Role and effectiveness of an information guide in improving catheter confidence and knowledge in junior clinicians

IF 0.2 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Clinical Urology Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1177/20514158221122534
G. Brown, Maximillian Johnston, W. Struss, B. Somani
{"title":"Role and effectiveness of an information guide in improving catheter confidence and knowledge in junior clinicians","authors":"G. Brown, Maximillian Johnston, W. Struss, B. Somani","doi":"10.1177/20514158221122534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Referrals to the on-call urology team for catheter-related problems are common. Experience and previous studies highlight that urology exposure and catheter skills are unsatisfactory in undergraduate training as well as in subsequent junior clinical practice. These deficiencies may compromise patient safety and delay appropriate treatment. This study aimed to assess catheter insertion confidence and associated knowledge in junior doctors and advanced nurse practitioners in a single teaching hospital and evaluate whether this could be improved by introducing a freely available catheter information and problem-solving guide. An online survey assessing confidence inserting two and three-way urethral catheters, changing suprapubic catheters and assessing knowledge related to common catheter problems was delivered to all non-registrar junior clinicians. Based on these results, an information guide was created and made freely available to these clinicians. The survey was then repeated to check for catheter-related knowledge and confidence. A total of 58 junior clinicians responded to the initial survey and 61 to the repeat survey. Catheterisation confidence and knowledge was generally low in the first survey but improved in all areas and across all grades after the introduction of the information guide. Of the respondents, 100% thought the guide was helpful and 93.4% said they would use it in future. A catheter information guide is a simple and effective method of improving junior clinician confidence with catheter insertion and managing catheter-associated problems. This study does not directly correlate with a defined level of evidence.","PeriodicalId":15471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158221122534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Referrals to the on-call urology team for catheter-related problems are common. Experience and previous studies highlight that urology exposure and catheter skills are unsatisfactory in undergraduate training as well as in subsequent junior clinical practice. These deficiencies may compromise patient safety and delay appropriate treatment. This study aimed to assess catheter insertion confidence and associated knowledge in junior doctors and advanced nurse practitioners in a single teaching hospital and evaluate whether this could be improved by introducing a freely available catheter information and problem-solving guide. An online survey assessing confidence inserting two and three-way urethral catheters, changing suprapubic catheters and assessing knowledge related to common catheter problems was delivered to all non-registrar junior clinicians. Based on these results, an information guide was created and made freely available to these clinicians. The survey was then repeated to check for catheter-related knowledge and confidence. A total of 58 junior clinicians responded to the initial survey and 61 to the repeat survey. Catheterisation confidence and knowledge was generally low in the first survey but improved in all areas and across all grades after the introduction of the information guide. Of the respondents, 100% thought the guide was helpful and 93.4% said they would use it in future. A catheter information guide is a simple and effective method of improving junior clinician confidence with catheter insertion and managing catheter-associated problems. This study does not directly correlate with a defined level of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信息指南在提高初级临床医生导管信心和知识方面的作用和有效性
因导管相关问题而转诊到随叫随到的泌尿外科团队是很常见的。经验和先前的研究强调,泌尿外科暴露和导管技能在本科培训和随后的初级临床实践中都不令人满意。这些缺陷可能会危及患者的安全并延误适当的治疗。本研究旨在评估一家教学医院的初级医生和高级执业护士的导管插入信心和相关知识,并评估是否可以通过引入免费提供的导管信息和解决问题指南来改善这一点。向所有未注册的初级临床医生提供了一项在线调查,评估插入两个和三个导尿管的信心、更换耻骨上导尿管以及评估与常见导尿管问题相关的知识。基于这些结果,创建了一份信息指南,并免费提供给这些临床医生。然后重复调查,以检查导管相关知识和信心。共有58名初级临床医生对初次调查作出回应,61名对重复调查作出回应。在第一次调查中,导管的信心和知识普遍较低,但在引入信息指南后,所有领域和所有年级的导管信心和知识都有所提高。在受访者中,100%的人认为该指南很有帮助,93.4%的人表示他们将来会使用它。导管信息指南是一种简单有效的方法,可以提高初级临床医生对导管插入和管理导管相关问题的信心。这项研究与确定的证据水平没有直接关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Urology
Journal of Clinical Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic value of the abnormal digital rectal examination in the modern MRI-based prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Comparison of the diagnostic utility of CHOKAI, STONE and STONE PLUS scores in predicting ureteral stones larger than 5 mm Quality of life and healthcare resource use in patients with bladder pain syndrome: A survey of UK patients Analysis of the learning curve for Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for a single surgeon Effectiveness of intravesical glycosaminoglycans in the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections: Systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1