After the European Commission Ordered Apple to Pay Back Taxes to Ireland: Ireland's Future in the New Global Tax Environment

Boyu Wang
{"title":"After the European Commission Ordered Apple to Pay Back Taxes to Ireland: Ireland's Future in the New Global Tax Environment","authors":"Boyu Wang","doi":"10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:On August 30, 2016, the European Commission ordered Ireland to collect $14.5 billion plus interest in unpaid taxes between 2003 and 2014 from Apple Inc. The European Union suggested that Ireland made \"sweetheart deals\" with Apple in exchange for bringing more jobs into the country and concluded that these deals constituted illegal tax benefits, contrary to the European Union's prohibitions against \"state aid.\"Profit shifting and transfer pricing manipulation dominate the analysis of the corporate tax structure in Ireland and its position in the context of global tax policy. This note explains the European Commission's Apple decision and analyzes how this decision will affect Ireland's international relations and its law reform, so that Ireland could comply with the European Union and international tax law.The European Commission's Apple decision helped the United States, the European Union, and Ireland start a conversation on how to work together to regulate tax evasion on a global scale. I conclude that tax system reforms on an international scale will happen in the future to combat \"illegal deals\" between multinational companies and specific countries.","PeriodicalId":39188,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"539 - 564"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INDJGLOLEGSTU.25.1.0539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:On August 30, 2016, the European Commission ordered Ireland to collect $14.5 billion plus interest in unpaid taxes between 2003 and 2014 from Apple Inc. The European Union suggested that Ireland made "sweetheart deals" with Apple in exchange for bringing more jobs into the country and concluded that these deals constituted illegal tax benefits, contrary to the European Union's prohibitions against "state aid."Profit shifting and transfer pricing manipulation dominate the analysis of the corporate tax structure in Ireland and its position in the context of global tax policy. This note explains the European Commission's Apple decision and analyzes how this decision will affect Ireland's international relations and its law reform, so that Ireland could comply with the European Union and international tax law.The European Commission's Apple decision helped the United States, the European Union, and Ireland start a conversation on how to work together to regulate tax evasion on a global scale. I conclude that tax system reforms on an international scale will happen in the future to combat "illegal deals" between multinational companies and specific countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在欧盟委员会命令苹果向爱尔兰补缴税款后:爱尔兰在新的全球税收环境中的未来
摘要:2016年8月30日,欧盟委员会要求爱尔兰向苹果公司征收145亿美元的未缴税款以及2003年至2014年的未缴税款利息。欧盟表示,爱尔兰与苹果公司达成了“甜心交易”,以换取更多的就业机会,并得出结论,这些交易构成了非法的税收优惠,违反了欧盟禁止“国家援助”的规定。利润转移和转移定价操纵主导了对爱尔兰企业税收结构及其在全球税收政策背景下的地位的分析。这篇文章解释了欧盟委员会对苹果公司的决定,并分析了这一决定将如何影响爱尔兰的国际关系和法律改革,使爱尔兰能够遵守欧盟和国际税法。欧盟委员会对苹果公司的裁决帮助美国、欧盟和爱尔兰开启了一场对话,讨论如何在全球范围内共同监管逃税行为。我的结论是,未来将在国际范围内进行税收制度改革,以打击跨国公司与特定国家之间的“非法交易”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Managing Digital Resale in the Era of International Exhaustion The Digital Transformation of Tax Systems Progress, Pitfalls, and Protection in a Danish Context Blockchain and the Right to Good Administration: Adding Blocks to or Blocking of the Globalization of Good Administration? The Risk of Digitalization: Transforming Government into a Digital Leviathan Guilty of Probable Cause: Public Arrest Records and Dignity in the Information Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1