The Effect of Sertreline Versus Nortriptyline on Quality of Life and Depression After Stroke:A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study

M. Shabani, M. Eshaghian, S. Mazloomzadeh
{"title":"The Effect of Sertreline Versus Nortriptyline on Quality of Life and Depression After Stroke:A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Study","authors":"M. Shabani, M. Eshaghian, S. Mazloomzadeh","doi":"10.30699/jambs.30.141.319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants are utilized for treatment of post stroke depression, reduced quality of life and poor compliance. This study compared the effects of sertraline and nortriptyline on the quality of life and depression in post-stroke patients. Materials & Methods: This randomized double-blind trial was conducted on 56 stroke patients admitted to Valiasr Hospital in Zanjan, Iran, 2016. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups by simple randomization and received sertraline in one group, nortriptyline in the other and nobody received placebo. Patients were screened for depression using BDI (II) questionnaire and those without depression were entered into study. During follow-up, patients completed a quality of life questionnaire named Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Data were analysed using repeated measure and Bonferroni tests in SPSS 22. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of patients in sertraline and nortriptyline groups were 61.7 and 63.6, respectively (P=0.194). No significant differences were observed for sex, marital status and education between two groups. The mean score of total quality of life and its dimensions decreased significantly during 6 months for both groups (P=0.001). The effect of sertraline in these reductions was not different from nortriptyline (P=0.60). The proportions of moderate or severe depression were 17.9% and 37.0% in sertraline and nortriptyline groups, respectively (P=0.24). Conclusion: Both sertraline and nortriptyline improved all aspects of quality of life and their effect on prevention of depression was similar. Therefore, the administration of sertraline or nortriptyline could be beneficial in post-stroke patients.","PeriodicalId":36550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Biomedical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/jambs.30.141.319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objective: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressants are utilized for treatment of post stroke depression, reduced quality of life and poor compliance. This study compared the effects of sertraline and nortriptyline on the quality of life and depression in post-stroke patients. Materials & Methods: This randomized double-blind trial was conducted on 56 stroke patients admitted to Valiasr Hospital in Zanjan, Iran, 2016. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups by simple randomization and received sertraline in one group, nortriptyline in the other and nobody received placebo. Patients were screened for depression using BDI (II) questionnaire and those without depression were entered into study. During follow-up, patients completed a quality of life questionnaire named Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). Data were analysed using repeated measure and Bonferroni tests in SPSS 22. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The mean age of patients in sertraline and nortriptyline groups were 61.7 and 63.6, respectively (P=0.194). No significant differences were observed for sex, marital status and education between two groups. The mean score of total quality of life and its dimensions decreased significantly during 6 months for both groups (P=0.001). The effect of sertraline in these reductions was not different from nortriptyline (P=0.60). The proportions of moderate or severe depression were 17.9% and 37.0% in sertraline and nortriptyline groups, respectively (P=0.24). Conclusion: Both sertraline and nortriptyline improved all aspects of quality of life and their effect on prevention of depression was similar. Therefore, the administration of sertraline or nortriptyline could be beneficial in post-stroke patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
赛特林与去甲替林对脑卒中后生活质量和抑郁的影响:一项随机双盲对照研究
背景与目的:选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和三环类抗抑郁药用于治疗脑卒中后抑郁、生活质量下降和依从性差。本研究比较舍曲林和去甲替林对脑卒中后患者生活质量和抑郁的影响。材料与方法:本随机双盲试验对2016年伊朗赞詹Valiasr医院收治的56例脑卒中患者进行研究。通过简单随机化将患者随机分为两组,一组使用舍曲林,另一组使用去甲替林,没有人使用安慰剂。采用BDI (II)问卷对患者进行抑郁筛查,并将无抑郁的患者纳入研究。在随访期间,患者完成了一份名为诺丁汉健康概况(NHP)的生活质量问卷。在SPSS 22中使用重复测量和Bonferroni检验分析数据。P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:舍曲林组和去甲替林组患者的平均年龄分别为61.7岁和63.6岁(P=0.194)。两组在性别、婚姻状况和教育程度上没有显著差异。两组患者6个月内总生活质量及其各维度平均得分均显著下降(P=0.001)。舍曲林在这些降低中的作用与去甲替林没有区别(P=0.60)。舍曲林组和去甲替林组出现中度、重度抑郁的比例分别为17.9%和37.0% (P=0.24)。结论:舍曲林和去甲替林均能改善患者各方面的生活质量,其预防抑郁症的效果相似。因此,服用舍曲林或去甲替林可能对中风后患者有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Effects of Vitamin C in Prognosis of Patients with Sepsis in Zanjan Vali- e-Asr Hospital in 2020 Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Shoulder Pain Following Laparoscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Anti-Adipogenic Effects of Eryngium billardieri Extract during 3T3-L1 Adipocyte Differentiation Evaluation of the Effect of Three Different Tidal Volumes on Internal Jugular Vein Collapsibility Index in Hypovolemic Mechanically-Ventilated Patients Before and After Fluid Therapy Comparison of Quality of Life in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Healthy Controls in North-East of Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1