A Change of Tune: The Democratization of Market Mediation and Crossover Production in the U.S. Commercial Music Industry

IF 8.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Administrative Science Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-12-14 DOI:10.1177/00018392221143779
Yuan Shi
{"title":"A Change of Tune: The Democratization of Market Mediation and Crossover Production in the U.S. Commercial Music Industry","authors":"Yuan Shi","doi":"10.1177/00018392221143779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines whether intermediaries and consumers exert similar influence on producers’ boundary-spanning efforts. I propose that boundary spanning is primarily constrained by intermediaries specialized in the market, not by consumers. Consequently, producers are more likely to obscure boundaries when intermediaries’ power weakens. To test these ideas, I exploit a natural experiment that shifted the hitmaking power of genre-specific radio stations to general consumers and thus partially democratized the market mediation structure of the U.S. commercial music industry. The results indicate that after democratization occurred in 2012, record labels were more likely to introduce crossover offerings that incorporated features from other popular genres. Through mechanism triangulation efforts, I found that strategic reorientation, or producers’ attempt to appeal to a broader spectrum of consumers across genre lines, plausibly explains the crossover effect. This study highlights democratizing changes that dilute intermediaries’ influence as a novel explanation of why constraints on producers’ boundary decisions have weakened in some markets. The findings suggest that intermediaries’ and consumers’ expectations may diverge, acting as conflicting forces that organizations must carefully manage. Many organizations closely monitor intermediaries that are deemed influential, but their influence should not be taken for granted as marketplaces empower consumers and become more democratized.","PeriodicalId":7203,"journal":{"name":"Administrative Science Quarterly","volume":"68 1","pages":"319 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative Science Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221143779","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines whether intermediaries and consumers exert similar influence on producers’ boundary-spanning efforts. I propose that boundary spanning is primarily constrained by intermediaries specialized in the market, not by consumers. Consequently, producers are more likely to obscure boundaries when intermediaries’ power weakens. To test these ideas, I exploit a natural experiment that shifted the hitmaking power of genre-specific radio stations to general consumers and thus partially democratized the market mediation structure of the U.S. commercial music industry. The results indicate that after democratization occurred in 2012, record labels were more likely to introduce crossover offerings that incorporated features from other popular genres. Through mechanism triangulation efforts, I found that strategic reorientation, or producers’ attempt to appeal to a broader spectrum of consumers across genre lines, plausibly explains the crossover effect. This study highlights democratizing changes that dilute intermediaries’ influence as a novel explanation of why constraints on producers’ boundary decisions have weakened in some markets. The findings suggest that intermediaries’ and consumers’ expectations may diverge, acting as conflicting forces that organizations must carefully manage. Many organizations closely monitor intermediaries that are deemed influential, but their influence should not be taken for granted as marketplaces empower consumers and become more democratized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
曲调的改变:美国商业音乐产业中市场调解和跨界生产的民主化
本文考察了中介机构和消费者是否对生产者的跨界努力施加了类似的影响。我认为,跨越边界主要受到市场专业中介机构的限制,而不是消费者的限制。因此,当中介机构的力量减弱时,生产者更有可能模糊界限。为了检验这些想法,我利用了一个自然的实验,将特定类型的广播电台的制作力转移到了普通消费者身上,从而使美国商业音乐行业的市场中介结构部分民主化。结果表明,2012年民主化后,唱片公司更有可能推出融合了其他流行流派特色的跨界产品。通过机制三角化的努力,我发现战略重新定位,或制片人试图吸引更广泛的跨类型消费者,似乎可以解释交叉效应。这项研究强调了淡化中介机构影响力的民主化变化,这是对为什么在一些市场上对生产者边界决策的限制减弱的一种新颖解释。研究结果表明,中介机构和消费者的期望可能存在分歧,成为组织必须谨慎管理的冲突力量。许多组织密切关注被认为有影响力的中介机构,但随着市场赋予消费者权力并变得更加民主,他们的影响力不应被视为理所当然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Administrative Science Quarterly, under the ownership and management of the Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management at Cornell University, has consistently been a pioneer in organizational studies since the inception of the field. As a premier journal, it consistently features the finest theoretical and empirical papers derived from dissertations, along with the latest contributions from well-established scholars. Additionally, the journal showcases interdisciplinary work in organizational theory and offers insightful book reviews.
期刊最新文献
This Is Why I Leave: Race and Voluntary Departure The Dynamics of Inferential Interpretation in Experiential Learning: Deciphering Hidden Goals from Ambiguous Experience Christina Lubinski. Navigating Nationalism in Global Enterprise: A Century of Indo-German Business Relations Falling Fortunes: The Contingent and Asymmetric Effect of Rankings on Organizational Outcomes Michel Anteby. The Interloper: Lessons from Resistance in the Field
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1