The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance

IF 10.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL European Review of Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-07-13 DOI:10.1080/10463283.2022.2091326
M. Verkuyten, K. Yogeeswaran, Levi Adelman
{"title":"The social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance","authors":"M. Verkuyten, K. Yogeeswaran, Levi Adelman","doi":"10.1080/10463283.2022.2091326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Living with cultural, religious, and ideological diversity inevitably creates situations where people are confronted with beliefs, values, or practices that they disapprove of. In such situations, people may consider reasons to nevertheless tolerate what they disapprove of (i.e., forbearance tolerance), or reject these (i.e., intolerance). In the current review, we consider empirical research on the processes of intergroup tolerance and consider different manifestations of (in)tolerance. Then we discuss recent work on the dual process model of tolerance, which considers intuitive versus deliberative objections to cultural, religious, and ideological differences, and how these can be overridden to produce tolerance. We then review literature on the boundaries of tolerance including the role of moralization and moral values, before considering individual difference factors and situations of threat that can hamper intergroup tolerance. We conclude by considering five areas ripe for future exploration on the social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance.","PeriodicalId":47582,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Social Psychology","volume":"34 1","pages":"1 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2022.2091326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Living with cultural, religious, and ideological diversity inevitably creates situations where people are confronted with beliefs, values, or practices that they disapprove of. In such situations, people may consider reasons to nevertheless tolerate what they disapprove of (i.e., forbearance tolerance), or reject these (i.e., intolerance). In the current review, we consider empirical research on the processes of intergroup tolerance and consider different manifestations of (in)tolerance. Then we discuss recent work on the dual process model of tolerance, which considers intuitive versus deliberative objections to cultural, religious, and ideological differences, and how these can be overridden to produce tolerance. We then review literature on the boundaries of tolerance including the role of moralization and moral values, before considering individual difference factors and situations of threat that can hamper intergroup tolerance. We conclude by considering five areas ripe for future exploration on the social psychology of intergroup tolerance and intolerance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体间容忍与不容忍的社会心理
生活在文化、宗教和意识形态的多样性中,不可避免地会造成人们面对他们不赞成的信仰、价值观或实践的情况。在这种情况下,人们可能会考虑理由来容忍他们不赞成的东西(即宽容宽容),或者拒绝这些东西(即不宽容)。在当前的综述中,我们考虑了对群体间耐受过程的实证研究,并考虑了(In)耐受的不同表现。然后,我们讨论了最近关于宽容的双重过程模型的研究,该模型考虑了对文化、宗教和意识形态差异的直觉与审慎反对,以及如何克服这些差异以产生宽容。然后,在考虑个体差异因素和可能阻碍群体间宽容的威胁情况之前,我们回顾了关于宽容边界的文献,包括道德化和道德价值观的作用。最后,我们考虑了未来探索群体间容忍和不容忍的社会心理学的五个成熟领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: The "European Review of Social Psychology (ERSP)" is a distinguished international journal that operates under the patronage of the European Association of Social Psychology. It serves as a platform for comprehensive, theory-driven reviews that cover the broad spectrum of social psychology. The journal is open to submissions from authors worldwide and is guided by a prestigious international editorial board. ERSP is particularly interested in publishing reviews that reflect the author's own research program, as demonstrated by their publications in leading peer-reviewed journals. The journal values theoretical contributions that are grounded in a substantial empirical foundation, situating the research within the broader context of existing literature and offering a synthesis that goes beyond the individual articles. In addition to these in-depth reviews, ERSP also welcomes conventional reviews and meta-analyses, further enriching the journal's offerings. By focusing on high-quality, evidence-based research, ERSP contributes significantly to the advancement of knowledge in social psychology and fosters a deeper understanding of human social behavior across cultures and societies.
期刊最新文献
Narrative interventions in conflict settings: Harnessing the power of narratives to prevent violence and promote peace A multi-dimensional typology of allyship action in violent intergroup conflict settings: Differentiating actor, target, and type of action Foucault’s error: The power of not knowing The model of ambivalent choice and dissonant commitment: An integration of dissonance and ambivalence frameworks A theoretical analysis and empirical agenda for understanding the socioecology of adult attachment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1