Research and evidence-based standards paving the way for a digital and sustainable transformation of the built environment

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT Facilities Pub Date : 2023-03-24 DOI:10.1108/f-06-2022-0088
N. J. Klungseth, S. B. Nielsen, Moacyr Eduardo Alves da Graça, S. Lavy
{"title":"Research and evidence-based standards paving the way for a digital and sustainable transformation of the built environment","authors":"N. J. Klungseth, S. B. Nielsen, Moacyr Eduardo Alves da Graça, S. Lavy","doi":"10.1108/f-06-2022-0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nResearchers and standardisation bodies are key to accelerating societal transition and contributing to society’s demands for sustainability, resilience and digitalisation. Standards are the agreed-upon best practices published by national or international bodies and are key enablers of transformation. Scholars have not yet identified a relationship between standards and facilities management (FM) research. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of formal standards in FM research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA literature review was conducted to identify journal articles addressing standards and FM. A total of 198 journal articles published from 2010 to 2021 were identified. After screening these articles, 27 journal articles were considered the most relevant for data analysis.\n\n\nFindings\nThe findings show that the role of standards in research can be analysed thematically, categorically, textually, methodologically and directionally. Standards are relevant to research by defining terms, creating backgrounds, guiding research, supporting the development of new standards and encouraging more collaboration between research and standardisation. Some studies have shown how standards influence research, but only a few have explored how research influences standards.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis research provides examples that inspire stronger collaboration between people and processes in research and standardisation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe articles collected and analysed in this study comprise original research. A limited preliminary study of ten core articles was presented at the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction World Congress 2022. This presentation of this work provides an expanded framework for analysing the roles of standards in research. This framework includes (1) categorical analysis of research and standardisation streams; (2) thematic analysis of the topic of interest; (3) textual analysis of the use of the term “standard”; (4) methodological analysis of the influence of standards on the research method; and (5) directional analysis of the intended audience.\n","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-06-2022-0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose Researchers and standardisation bodies are key to accelerating societal transition and contributing to society’s demands for sustainability, resilience and digitalisation. Standards are the agreed-upon best practices published by national or international bodies and are key enablers of transformation. Scholars have not yet identified a relationship between standards and facilities management (FM) research. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of formal standards in FM research. Design/methodology/approach A literature review was conducted to identify journal articles addressing standards and FM. A total of 198 journal articles published from 2010 to 2021 were identified. After screening these articles, 27 journal articles were considered the most relevant for data analysis. Findings The findings show that the role of standards in research can be analysed thematically, categorically, textually, methodologically and directionally. Standards are relevant to research by defining terms, creating backgrounds, guiding research, supporting the development of new standards and encouraging more collaboration between research and standardisation. Some studies have shown how standards influence research, but only a few have explored how research influences standards. Research limitations/implications This research provides examples that inspire stronger collaboration between people and processes in research and standardisation. Originality/value The articles collected and analysed in this study comprise original research. A limited preliminary study of ten core articles was presented at the International Council for Research and Innovation in Building and Construction World Congress 2022. This presentation of this work provides an expanded framework for analysing the roles of standards in research. This framework includes (1) categorical analysis of research and standardisation streams; (2) thematic analysis of the topic of interest; (3) textual analysis of the use of the term “standard”; (4) methodological analysis of the influence of standards on the research method; and (5) directional analysis of the intended audience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究和基于证据的标准为建筑环境的数字化和可持续转型铺平道路
研究人员和标准化机构是加速社会转型和促进社会对可持续性、弹性和数字化需求的关键。标准是由国家或国际机构发布的商定的最佳实践,是转型的关键推动因素。学者们尚未确定标准与设施管理(FM)研究之间的关系。本文的目的是探讨形式标准在调频研究中的作用。设计/方法/方法进行文献综述,以确定涉及标准和FM的期刊文章。2010 - 2021年共收录198篇期刊文章。筛选这些文章后,27篇期刊文章被认为与数据分析最相关。研究结果表明,标准在研究中的作用可以从主题、分类、文本、方法和方向上进行分析。标准通过定义术语、创建背景、指导研究、支持新标准的开发以及鼓励研究和标准化之间的更多合作来与研究相关。一些研究显示了标准如何影响研究,但只有少数研究探讨了研究如何影响标准。研究的局限性/意义本研究提供了一些例子,可以激发人们与研究和标准化过程之间更强的合作。原创性/价值本研究收集和分析的文章包含原创性研究。国际建筑与建筑研究与创新理事会2022年世界大会上提出了十篇核心文章的有限初步研究。这项工作的介绍为分析标准在研究中的作用提供了一个扩展的框架。该框架包括(1)研究和标准化流程的分类分析;(2)主题分析感兴趣的话题;(三)对“标准”一词的用法进行文本分析;(4)标准对研究方法影响的方法学分析;(5)目标受众的定向分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
期刊最新文献
Facility network design by using k-mean and elbow method: a case of Indian handloom industry Investigating the role of path architecture complexity in users’ movement patterns in hospital circulation systems: case studies in Golestan, Iran Students with disabilities (SWDs) and facilities accessibility in a northern Nigerian public university: dismantling exclusion in achieving SDG4 Students’ support facilities and academic adjustment among first-year undergraduates: evidence from a Nigerian public university Barriers to the adoption of energy management systems in residential buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1