Do wider riparian zones alter benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ diversity and taxonomic composition in neotropical headwater streams?

Q2 Environmental Science Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia Pub Date : 2021-10-18 DOI:10.1590/s2179-975x3821
M. S. Linares, Livia B. dos Santos, M. Callisto, J. C. Santos
{"title":"Do wider riparian zones alter benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ diversity and taxonomic composition in neotropical headwater streams?","authors":"M. S. Linares, Livia B. dos Santos, M. Callisto, J. C. Santos","doi":"10.1590/s2179-975x3821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Aim The maintenance and condition of riparian vegetation are important factors for conserving headwater streams and their species diversity. Thus, variations in the width of a riparian zone can have dramatic effects in the structure and functioning of the adjacent freshwater ecosystem. In this study, we aimed to determine if increased riparian zone width changed the benthic assemblages’ structure (diversity, taxonomic and functional composition) in headwater streams. Methods We tested two predictions: (1) increased riparian zone width will change the diversity and taxonomic composition of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages because narrow riparian zones do not buffer the anthropogenic impacts from the surrounding landscape; (2) wider riparian zones will change benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ functional structure, due to changes to energetic input and quality. To test the first prediction, we assessed the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ taxonomic composition, richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity index. To test the second prediction, we assessed functional feeding groups (FFG) and metrics based on their proportion. Results Our results showed that our first prediction was not corroborated, because taxonomic structure and diversity did not show significant variation with increased riparian zone width. Our second prediction was partially corroborated, because there were significant alterations in the functional structure of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages between the narrowest riparian zone width (30 m) and the others two (50 and 100 m). Conclusions Our results suggest that, contrary to the Brazilian Federal Law 12651/2012, 30-m wide riparian zones are insufficient to protect headwater stream ecosystem functioning.","PeriodicalId":38854,"journal":{"name":"Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s2179-975x3821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract: Aim The maintenance and condition of riparian vegetation are important factors for conserving headwater streams and their species diversity. Thus, variations in the width of a riparian zone can have dramatic effects in the structure and functioning of the adjacent freshwater ecosystem. In this study, we aimed to determine if increased riparian zone width changed the benthic assemblages’ structure (diversity, taxonomic and functional composition) in headwater streams. Methods We tested two predictions: (1) increased riparian zone width will change the diversity and taxonomic composition of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages because narrow riparian zones do not buffer the anthropogenic impacts from the surrounding landscape; (2) wider riparian zones will change benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ functional structure, due to changes to energetic input and quality. To test the first prediction, we assessed the benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages’ taxonomic composition, richness and Shannon-Wiener diversity index. To test the second prediction, we assessed functional feeding groups (FFG) and metrics based on their proportion. Results Our results showed that our first prediction was not corroborated, because taxonomic structure and diversity did not show significant variation with increased riparian zone width. Our second prediction was partially corroborated, because there were significant alterations in the functional structure of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages between the narrowest riparian zone width (30 m) and the others two (50 and 100 m). Conclusions Our results suggest that, contrary to the Brazilian Federal Law 12651/2012, 30-m wide riparian zones are insufficient to protect headwater stream ecosystem functioning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
更宽的河岸带是否改变了新热带源流中底栖大型无脊椎动物群落的多样性和分类组成?
摘要/ Abstract摘要:目的河岸植被的维持与状况是保护源流及其物种多样性的重要因素。因此,河岸带宽度的变化会对邻近淡水生态系统的结构和功能产生巨大影响。在本研究中,我们旨在确定增加的河岸带宽度是否改变了源流中底栖生物组合的结构(多样性、分类和功能组成)。方法对两种预测结果进行了验证:(1)增大的河岸带宽度将改变大型底栖无脊椎动物群落的多样性和分类组成,因为狭窄的河岸带不能缓冲来自周围景观的人为影响;(2)由于能量输入和质量的变化,更宽的河岸带将改变底栖大型无脊椎动物群落的功能结构。为了验证第一个预测,我们评估了底栖大型无脊椎动物组合的分类组成、丰富度和Shannon-Wiener多样性指数。为了验证第二个预测,我们评估了功能喂养组(FFG)和基于其比例的指标。结果发现,随着河岸带宽度的增加,分类学结构和多样性并没有明显的变化。我们的第二个预测得到了部分证实,因为在最窄的河岸带宽度(30 m)和其他两个(50和100 m)之间,底栖大型无脊椎动物群落的功能结构发生了显著变化。结论我们的研究结果表明,与巴西联邦法律12651/2012相反,30 m宽的河岸带不足以保护水源生态系统的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia
Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
50 weeks
期刊最新文献
Length-weight relationship of fishes from an estuary of Abrolhos Bank, Brazil Reviewing the organic matter processing by wetlands A global review on invasive traits of macrophytes and their link to invasion success Incorporating symmetrical and asymmetrical dispersal into Ecological Niche Models in freshwater environments Impacts of extreme precipitation events in water quality: a scientometric analysis in global scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1