Robotic resection in liver malignancies

C. Lin
{"title":"Robotic resection in liver malignancies","authors":"C. Lin","doi":"10.21037/LS-20-58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimally invasive surgery in liver malignancies has always been a challenge to surgeons. Although laparoscopic liver resection had been proved feasible and safe, the steep learning curve indicates the difficulties itself. Robotic system arises to tackle the limitations of laparoscopic surgery with its unique features. Literature review of robotic liver resection in recent years on MEDLINE and PubMed was explored. The outcomes of surgical parameters, learning curve and feasibility were concluded in this review along with pros and cons of robotic liver resection. There are no significant differences in short-term perioperative outcomes regarding blood loss, morbidity and mortality rates and hospital stay. The longterm outcomes of robotic liver resection have not been well analyzed. Robotic group had a significant higher proportion of major hepatectomies and resection of tumors located at posterosuperior segments compared with laparoscopic group. Robotic liver resection is considered as feasible and safe in experienced hands. Its featured instrument advantages allow surgeon to tackle problems encountered in laparoscopic procedures and to advance to other disease entities. A dedicated team proficient in equipment, surgical expertise and well-established proctorship are key factors in implementation of clinical use. Large scale multicenter randomized control trials are still mandated to draw definite conclusions.","PeriodicalId":92818,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/LS-20-58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery in liver malignancies has always been a challenge to surgeons. Although laparoscopic liver resection had been proved feasible and safe, the steep learning curve indicates the difficulties itself. Robotic system arises to tackle the limitations of laparoscopic surgery with its unique features. Literature review of robotic liver resection in recent years on MEDLINE and PubMed was explored. The outcomes of surgical parameters, learning curve and feasibility were concluded in this review along with pros and cons of robotic liver resection. There are no significant differences in short-term perioperative outcomes regarding blood loss, morbidity and mortality rates and hospital stay. The longterm outcomes of robotic liver resection have not been well analyzed. Robotic group had a significant higher proportion of major hepatectomies and resection of tumors located at posterosuperior segments compared with laparoscopic group. Robotic liver resection is considered as feasible and safe in experienced hands. Its featured instrument advantages allow surgeon to tackle problems encountered in laparoscopic procedures and to advance to other disease entities. A dedicated team proficient in equipment, surgical expertise and well-established proctorship are key factors in implementation of clinical use. Large scale multicenter randomized control trials are still mandated to draw definite conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝脏恶性肿瘤的机器人切除术
肝恶性肿瘤的微创手术一直是困扰外科医生的难题。虽然腹腔镜肝切除术已被证明是可行和安全的,但陡峭的学习曲线本身就表明了困难。机器人系统以其独特的特点解决了腹腔镜手术的局限性。在MEDLINE和PubMed上对近年来机器人肝切除术的文献进行了综述。本文综述了机器人肝切除术的手术参数、学习曲线和可行性,以及机器人肝切除术的优缺点。短期围手术期结果在出血量、发病率、死亡率和住院时间方面无显著差异。机器人肝切除术的长期结果尚未得到很好的分析。机器人组肝大切除术及后上节段肿瘤切除术的比例明显高于腹腔镜组。在经验丰富的人手中,机器人肝脏切除术被认为是可行和安全的。其独特的仪器优势使外科医生能够解决腹腔镜手术中遇到的问题,并推进到其他疾病实体。一个专业的团队精通设备,外科专业知识和完善的监护是实施临床应用的关键因素。大规模的多中心随机对照试验仍然需要得出明确的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimally-invasive multidisciplinary treatment of deep endometriosis: 103 cases Case report: neuroendocrine tumour causing torsion of the appendix in an adolescent—a rare and unexpected twist Is elective cholecystectomy effective in geriatric patients to prevent new biliopancreatic events following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for benign biliopancreatic pathology? Managing complex pancreatic anastomoses after minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy Laparoscopic management of giant adrenal cyst: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1