Understanding governance and control challenges of blockchain technology in healthcare and energy sectors: a historical perspective

IF 0.9 Q4 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management History Pub Date : 2023-07-14 DOI:10.1108/jmh-12-2022-0086
J. Zhang, Wu He, Sachin Shetty, Xin Tian, Yuming He, Abhishek Behl, Ajith Kumar Vadakki Veetil
{"title":"Understanding governance and control challenges of blockchain technology in healthcare and energy sectors: a historical perspective","authors":"J. Zhang, Wu He, Sachin Shetty, Xin Tian, Yuming He, Abhishek Behl, Ajith Kumar Vadakki Veetil","doi":"10.1108/jmh-12-2022-0086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDespite rapid growth in blockchains, there was limited discussion about non-technical and technical factors on blockchain governance in the extant literature. This study aims to contribute new knowledge to the literature on potential factors affecting the adoption, governance and scale-up of blockchain technologies in the health-care and energy sectors, presented in a holistic framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study adopts the qualitative case study research methodology to research blockchain governance in practice. The authors contacted a national blockchain consortium to conduct their research on the governance issue of blockchain. Two leading case organizations, one from the health-care industry and another from the energy industry, were deliberately selected for their study for their active role and reputation in the consortium and practical experience in blockchain governance.\n\n\nFindings\nThe developed framework helps identify potential research gaps or concerns on adopting a blockchain as well as assessing blockchain implementation and governance in other industries. Depending on the circumstances, some of the factors can be either drivers or obstacles to further blockchain development. The different forces may also be more or less evident over time as blockchains develop. The two real-world case studies contribute to the information technology governance literature on blockchain governance.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe results of this case studies will be beneficial for developing theories and empirical models to determine antecedents for achieving consensus and trust in blockchain and testing the relationship between these factors and blockchain governance at different levels. As a result, theories related to the governance of blockchain technologies could be further developed.\n","PeriodicalId":45819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management History","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmh-12-2022-0086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Despite rapid growth in blockchains, there was limited discussion about non-technical and technical factors on blockchain governance in the extant literature. This study aims to contribute new knowledge to the literature on potential factors affecting the adoption, governance and scale-up of blockchain technologies in the health-care and energy sectors, presented in a holistic framework. Design/methodology/approach This study adopts the qualitative case study research methodology to research blockchain governance in practice. The authors contacted a national blockchain consortium to conduct their research on the governance issue of blockchain. Two leading case organizations, one from the health-care industry and another from the energy industry, were deliberately selected for their study for their active role and reputation in the consortium and practical experience in blockchain governance. Findings The developed framework helps identify potential research gaps or concerns on adopting a blockchain as well as assessing blockchain implementation and governance in other industries. Depending on the circumstances, some of the factors can be either drivers or obstacles to further blockchain development. The different forces may also be more or less evident over time as blockchains develop. The two real-world case studies contribute to the information technology governance literature on blockchain governance. Originality/value The results of this case studies will be beneficial for developing theories and empirical models to determine antecedents for achieving consensus and trust in blockchain and testing the relationship between these factors and blockchain governance at different levels. As a result, theories related to the governance of blockchain technologies could be further developed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解区块链技术在医疗保健和能源领域的治理和控制挑战:历史视角
目的尽管区块链发展迅速,但现有文献中对区块链治理的非技术和技术因素的讨论有限。本研究旨在为影响医疗保健和能源部门采用、治理和扩大区块链技术的潜在因素的文献提供新的知识,这些因素在一个整体框架中提出。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用定性案例研究的方法研究区块链治理在实践中的应用。作者联系了一个国家区块链联盟,就区块链的治理问题进行研究。两个领先的案例组织,一个来自医疗保健行业,另一个来自能源行业,因其在联盟中的积极作用和声誉以及在区块链治理方面的实践经验而被有意选中进行研究。发现开发的框架有助于确定采用区块链的潜在研究差距或关注点,并评估区块链在其他行业的实施和治理。根据具体情况,其中一些因素可能是区块链进一步发展的驱动因素或障碍。随着区块链的发展,不同的力量也可能随着时间的推移而或多或少地显现出来。这两个真实世界的案例研究为区块链治理的信息技术治理文献做出了贡献。原创性/价值本案例研究的结果将有助于开发理论和实证模型,以确定在区块链中达成共识和信任的前因,并在不同层面测试这些因素与区块链治理之间的关系。因此,与区块链技术治理相关的理论可以得到进一步发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Unveiling the intellectual nexus between Peirce’s synechism and Goldratt’s theory of constraints: insights for management and organization studies Back to roots! The singular introduction of statutory auditing in France, Germany and Great Britain (1844–1935) Rooting firm responsibility in social-ecological systems through ancient Nahua thought: rethinking the logic model in the global reporting initiative The troubled establishment of the Tourist Hotel Corporation of New Zealand Boundary spanning activities and resource orchestration as microfoundations of dynamic capability: a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1