The politics of video intimacy: Julie Gustafson’s feminist documentary practice

IF 0.5 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION Studies in Documentary Film Pub Date : 2023-05-29 DOI:10.1080/17503280.2023.2217622
Rachel Fabian
{"title":"The politics of video intimacy: Julie Gustafson’s feminist documentary practice","authors":"Rachel Fabian","doi":"10.1080/17503280.2023.2217622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article historicizes and theorizes the feminist documentary practice of Julie Gustafson, focusing on The Politics of Intimacy: Ten Women Talk About Orgasm and Sexuality (US, 1973) and Desire (US, 2005). Employing archival research and original interviews with Gustafson, it argues that both works interrogate intimacy’s use value for navigating new modes of documentary witnessing afforded by video. It begins by contextualizing The Politics of Intimacy’s modes of ‘intimate witnessing’ in relation to 1970s guerrilla TV movements, feminist documentary filmmaking, and women’s video art, as well as in terms of Gustafson’s involvement in the Manhattan-based Global Village Video Resource Center. It then analyzes how The Politics of Intimacy utilizes a ‘voice-centered’ feminist documentary method, which foregrounds video’s intimate appeals and polyvocal modes of address to create a multilayered account of women’s sexual experiences. Finally, the article contends that The Politics of Intimacy’s voice-centered approach crucially informs the interplay of generational voices in Desire, which documents Gustafson’s long-term collaboration with the Teenage Girls’ Documentary Project. Gustafson’s documentary practice takes on added complexity in Desire, as it maps emergent solidarities across generations of women video makers to reveal feminist voicing to be a complex, at-times contradictory expression of the self-in-relation.","PeriodicalId":43545,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Documentary Film","volume":"17 1","pages":"304 - 319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Documentary Film","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2023.2217622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article historicizes and theorizes the feminist documentary practice of Julie Gustafson, focusing on The Politics of Intimacy: Ten Women Talk About Orgasm and Sexuality (US, 1973) and Desire (US, 2005). Employing archival research and original interviews with Gustafson, it argues that both works interrogate intimacy’s use value for navigating new modes of documentary witnessing afforded by video. It begins by contextualizing The Politics of Intimacy’s modes of ‘intimate witnessing’ in relation to 1970s guerrilla TV movements, feminist documentary filmmaking, and women’s video art, as well as in terms of Gustafson’s involvement in the Manhattan-based Global Village Video Resource Center. It then analyzes how The Politics of Intimacy utilizes a ‘voice-centered’ feminist documentary method, which foregrounds video’s intimate appeals and polyvocal modes of address to create a multilayered account of women’s sexual experiences. Finally, the article contends that The Politics of Intimacy’s voice-centered approach crucially informs the interplay of generational voices in Desire, which documents Gustafson’s long-term collaboration with the Teenage Girls’ Documentary Project. Gustafson’s documentary practice takes on added complexity in Desire, as it maps emergent solidarities across generations of women video makers to reveal feminist voicing to be a complex, at-times contradictory expression of the self-in-relation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视频亲密的政治:朱莉·古斯塔夫森的女权主义纪录片实践
本文将朱莉·古斯塔夫森的女权主义纪录片实践历史化并理论化,重点关注《亲密的政治:十个女人谈论性高潮和性行为》(美国,1973年)和《欲望》(美国,2005年)。通过档案研究和对古斯塔夫森的原始采访,作者认为这两部作品都质疑了亲密关系的使用价值,以引导由视频提供的纪录片见证的新模式。它首先将《亲密政治》的“亲密见证”模式与20世纪70年代的游击电视运动、女权主义纪录片制作和女性视频艺术联系起来,以及古斯塔夫森在曼哈顿地球村视频资源中心的参与。然后分析了《亲密的政治》是如何运用“以声音为中心”的女权主义纪录片方法的,这种方法突出了视频的亲密诉求和多声音的称呼模式,创造了一个多层次的女性性经历的描述。最后,文章认为,《亲密的政治》以声音为中心的方法至关重要地揭示了《欲望》中代际声音的相互作用,《欲望》记录了古斯塔夫森与少女纪录片项目的长期合作。古斯塔夫森的纪录片实践在《欲望》中增加了复杂性,因为它描绘了几代女性视频制作者之间出现的团结,揭示了女权主义的声音是一种复杂的,有时是相互矛盾的自我关系表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Documentary Film
Studies in Documentary Film FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Documentary Film is the first refereed scholarly journal devoted to the history, theory, criticism and practice of documentary film. In recent years we have witnessed an increased visibility for documentary film through conferences, the success of general theatrical releases and the re-emergence of scholarship in documentary film studies. Studies in Documentary Film is a peer-reviewed journal.
期刊最新文献
‘And then … ’: new media’s conspiracy theories and counternarratives in Loose Change and The Power of Nightmares South Korean Documentary Cinema and remembrance: the past in the present, at Jeonju Film Festival 2024 The image of the absent narrators: personal migrant memories in Žilnik’s docu-experiments Exploring the empathic potential of 360-degree documentary The cinema of Rithy Panh: everything has a soul
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1