The quality assessment of stakeholder engagement disclosure in the EU mandatory non-financial reporting framework

IF 3.9 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Applied Accounting Research Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.1108/jaar-11-2022-0290
Saverio Petruzzelli, F. Badia
{"title":"The quality assessment of stakeholder engagement disclosure in the EU mandatory non-financial reporting framework","authors":"Saverio Petruzzelli, F. Badia","doi":"10.1108/jaar-11-2022-0290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis article investigates the quality of stakeholder engagement (SE) process disclosure in the context of non-financial reporting (NFR) introduced by Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD). SE implies the involvement of the subjects interested in the organization's activity, according to the principle of inclusiveness and the key concepts of the stakeholder theory (ST).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a content analysis on 75 non-financial statements (NFSs) published by companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchange in 2018 and 2021 to evaluate the evolutionary profiles of SE quality through the years.FindingsThe average level of SE is not significantly high. The research showed an overall poor quality of disclosure concerning stakeholders' key expectations and issues to be addressed and answered. Furthermore, a certain variability emerged in the quality of the disclosure between the various reports, and no significant improvements in SE quality were noted from 2018 to 2021.Research limitations/implicationsThe conclusions provide a replicable method for the analysis of SE quality in NFSs and the development of new standpoints in the ongoing debate on the implications of mandatory legislative frameworks for NFR. Content analyses intrinsically present margins of subjectivity. The sample was limited to a subset of NFS from Italy; hence, the results could be country specific.Practical implicationsThis work suggests some possible ways of improvement of SE practices by companies.Originality/valueOriginal assessment model based on eight variables identified from the academic literature and the most common international sustainability reporting standards. These variables were stakeholder identification, stakeholder selection process, degree of involvement, SE approach, dialogue channels, SE results, different points of view and integration of the SE process.","PeriodicalId":46321,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-11-2022-0290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis article investigates the quality of stakeholder engagement (SE) process disclosure in the context of non-financial reporting (NFR) introduced by Directive 2014/95/EU (NFRD). SE implies the involvement of the subjects interested in the organization's activity, according to the principle of inclusiveness and the key concepts of the stakeholder theory (ST).Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted a content analysis on 75 non-financial statements (NFSs) published by companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchange in 2018 and 2021 to evaluate the evolutionary profiles of SE quality through the years.FindingsThe average level of SE is not significantly high. The research showed an overall poor quality of disclosure concerning stakeholders' key expectations and issues to be addressed and answered. Furthermore, a certain variability emerged in the quality of the disclosure between the various reports, and no significant improvements in SE quality were noted from 2018 to 2021.Research limitations/implicationsThe conclusions provide a replicable method for the analysis of SE quality in NFSs and the development of new standpoints in the ongoing debate on the implications of mandatory legislative frameworks for NFR. Content analyses intrinsically present margins of subjectivity. The sample was limited to a subset of NFS from Italy; hence, the results could be country specific.Practical implicationsThis work suggests some possible ways of improvement of SE practices by companies.Originality/valueOriginal assessment model based on eight variables identified from the academic literature and the most common international sustainability reporting standards. These variables were stakeholder identification, stakeholder selection process, degree of involvement, SE approach, dialogue channels, SE results, different points of view and integration of the SE process.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧盟强制性非财务报告框架下利益相关者参与披露的质量评估
本文研究了2014/95/EU指令(NFRD)引入的非财务报告(NFR)背景下利益相关者参与(SE)过程披露的质量。根据包容性原则和利益相关者理论(ST)的关键概念,SE意味着对组织活动感兴趣的主体的参与。设计/方法/方法作者对2018年和2021年在意大利证券交易所上市的公司发布的75份非财务报表(NFSs)进行了内容分析,以评估这些年来SE质量的演变概况。结果SE的平均水平并不高。研究表明,在利益相关者的关键期望和需要解决和回答的问题方面,披露的总体质量很差。此外,不同报告之间的披露质量存在一定的可变性,从2018年到2021年,SE质量没有显著改善。研究的局限性/意义这些结论为分析国家森林保护区的社会服务质量提供了一种可复制的方法,并为正在进行的关于国家森林保护区强制性立法框架的影响的辩论提供了新的立场。内容分析本质上呈现主体性的边缘。样本仅限于来自意大利的NFS的一个子集;因此,结果可能是针对具体国家的。实际意义本工作提出了公司改进SE实践的一些可能的方法。原创性/价值原创性评估模型基于从学术文献和最常见的国际可持续发展报告标准中确定的八个变量。这些变量是利益相关者识别、利益相关者选择过程、参与程度、SE方法、对话渠道、SE结果、不同观点和SE过程的整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Accounting Research provides a forum for the publication of high quality manuscripts concerning issues relevant to the practice of accounting in a wide variety of contexts. The journal seeks to promote a research agenda that allows academics and practitioners to work together to provide sustainable outcomes in a practice setting. The journal is keen to encourage academic research articles which develop a forum for the discussion of real, practical problems and provide the expertise to allow solutions to these problems to be formed, while also contributing to our theoretical understanding of such issues.
期刊最新文献
Greenhouse gas assurance and carbon emission performance in light of the auditor’s reputation and the country’s development level A mixed methods study of influences on perceived budgeting accuracy in UK universities Corporate culture's influence on the transparency of financial reporting in Iran: an in-depth analysis of readability and tone Earnings quality among private firms: evidence from the ELITE context The impact of board gender diversity on firm performance: does critical mass matter?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1