Comparison the effects of using two methods of fluid therapy with normal saline or 5% dextrose in half amount of normal saline solution on blood glucose and plasma electrolytes during and after neonatal surgeries: A randomized controlled trial

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Clinical Neonatology Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.4103/jcn.jcn_131_21
Hamidreza Shatabi, Negin Moghadam, A. Shafa, Mohamadreza Habibzade
{"title":"Comparison the effects of using two methods of fluid therapy with normal saline or 5% dextrose in half amount of normal saline solution on blood glucose and plasma electrolytes during and after neonatal surgeries: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Hamidreza Shatabi, Negin Moghadam, A. Shafa, Mohamadreza Habibzade","doi":"10.4103/jcn.jcn_131_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Nowadays, with or without sugar, balanced electrolyte solutions are used to prevent hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia for neonatal fluid therapy. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of two types of fluid therapy with normal saline and 5% dextrose in half amount of normal saline (DW5% NaCl 0.45%) solution on plasma electrolytes and blood glucose during and after surgery in neonates. Methods: The research population consisted of 1-day to 30-day-old infants who were candidates for surgery under general anesthesia; 70 infants were selected and assigned by block randomization in two groups of 35. Patients in Group A received fluid therapy with normal saline 0.9% (10 cc/kg/h) and DW 5% NaCl 0.45% solution in Group B (10 cc/kg/h). Results: There was no significant difference in the mean value of bicarbonate level (HCO3), base excess and blood acidity (pH) in the study groups (P > 0.05). In Group A, there was no significant difference in sodium (Na) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) over time (P > 0.123), while in Group B, Na level decreased and MAP increased significantly (P < 0.05) with time. Blood sugar levels increased significantly in both groups over time, although this increase was greater in Group B. Conclusion: In general, the results of the study showed that both fluid therapy with normal saline and DW5% NaCl 0.45% solutions can be used in neonatal surgery, but based on the studied variables in this work, normal saline has a lower risk of hyperglycemia than DW5% NaCl 0.45% solution and therefore it is preferred.","PeriodicalId":45332,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","volume":"11 1","pages":"79 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcn.jcn_131_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Nowadays, with or without sugar, balanced electrolyte solutions are used to prevent hyponatremia, hypoglycemia, and hyperglycemia for neonatal fluid therapy. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the effects of two types of fluid therapy with normal saline and 5% dextrose in half amount of normal saline (DW5% NaCl 0.45%) solution on plasma electrolytes and blood glucose during and after surgery in neonates. Methods: The research population consisted of 1-day to 30-day-old infants who were candidates for surgery under general anesthesia; 70 infants were selected and assigned by block randomization in two groups of 35. Patients in Group A received fluid therapy with normal saline 0.9% (10 cc/kg/h) and DW 5% NaCl 0.45% solution in Group B (10 cc/kg/h). Results: There was no significant difference in the mean value of bicarbonate level (HCO3), base excess and blood acidity (pH) in the study groups (P > 0.05). In Group A, there was no significant difference in sodium (Na) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) over time (P > 0.123), while in Group B, Na level decreased and MAP increased significantly (P < 0.05) with time. Blood sugar levels increased significantly in both groups over time, although this increase was greater in Group B. Conclusion: In general, the results of the study showed that both fluid therapy with normal saline and DW5% NaCl 0.45% solutions can be used in neonatal surgery, but based on the studied variables in this work, normal saline has a lower risk of hyperglycemia than DW5% NaCl 0.45% solution and therefore it is preferred.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较生理盐水和5%葡萄糖/一半生理盐水两种液体疗法对新生儿手术期间和术后血糖和血浆电解质的影响:一项随机对照试验
背景:目前,加糖或不加糖,平衡电解质溶液用于新生儿液体治疗中预防低钠血症、低血糖和高血糖。目的:本研究旨在比较生理盐水和5%葡萄糖加半量生理盐水(DW5% NaCl 0.45%)两种液体疗法对新生儿手术期间和术后血浆电解质和血糖的影响。方法:研究人群包括1天至30天的婴儿,他们是全麻下手术的候选人;选取70例婴儿,采用分组随机法分为两组,每组35例。A组采用生理盐水0.9% (10cc /kg/h), B组采用DW 5% NaCl 0.45%溶液(10cc /kg/h)进行液体治疗。结果:两组患者碳酸氢盐水平(HCO3)、碱过量、血酸度(pH)均值比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。A组患者钠(Na)、平均动脉压(MAP)随时间变化差异无统计学意义(P < 0.123), B组患者钠(Na)随时间变化显著降低,MAP随时间变化显著升高(P < 0.05)。随着时间的推移,两组患者血糖水平均显著升高,但b组升高幅度更大。结论:总体而言,本研究结果表明,新生儿手术中均可使用生理盐水和DW5% NaCl 0.45%溶液进行液体治疗,但基于本研究的变量,生理盐水发生高血糖的风险低于DW5% NaCl 0.45%溶液,因此是首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The JCN publishes original articles, clinical reviews and research reports which encompass both basic science and clinical research including randomized trials, observational studies and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Congenital Megalourethra Presented with Renal Anomalies Glomerular Filtration Rate in Sick Neonates: A Focus on Cystatin C Neonatal Enteroviral Meningoencephalitis: Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics of a Nosocomial Outbreak in Colombia Aphallia with Anal Stenosis and Congenital Cyanotic Heart Disease: A Rare Case Report The Effect of Plastic Wrap Use to Prevent Hypothermia on Neonatal Mortality and Morbidity in Extreme Preterm Infants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1