Rivers as Legal Personalities in India and Bangladesh from an Eco-Centric Perspective: Balancing Developmental Needs and Environmental Protection

IF 0.4 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Chinese Journal of Environmental Law Pub Date : 2022-12-07 DOI:10.1163/24686042-12340087
Stellina Jolly, Gayathri D. Naik
{"title":"Rivers as Legal Personalities in India and Bangladesh from an Eco-Centric Perspective: Balancing Developmental Needs and Environmental Protection","authors":"Stellina Jolly, Gayathri D. Naik","doi":"10.1163/24686042-12340087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recognition of the right to the environment as a human right in several jurisdictions revolutionised the approach towards environmental protection. Nevertheless, the right to the environment has an anthropogenic dimension, and this recognition could not mitigate the environmental crisis faced by the planet. In response to this increasing ecological crisis, the concept of recognising the rights to nature evolved. The Indian judiciary propounded the river Ganges and Yamuna; Glaciers, Gangotri, and Yamunotri as legal personalities and granted them the rights commensurate with that of a human being. This trend gained attention in Bangladesh, which gave all its rivers rights and legal personhood in 2019. Though the decisions followed the more prominent global trend, these decisions differ from the worldwide movement and their decisions in the articulation of rights and implementation. This paper critically evaluates the legal developments in the rights to nature jurisprudence in India and Bangladesh, focusing on the right to rivers. A critical understanding of the judicial developments is essential in analysing the potential of giving the rights of rivers in improving environmental protection strategies. Considering the impact of these judgments in the transboundary context, the paper looks into the impacts and implications of this recognition on transboundary river governance in India and Bangladesh. The article articulates an eco-centric approach as the starting point for evolving a global perspective in recognising the rights of rivers.","PeriodicalId":29889,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Environmental Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24686042-12340087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recognition of the right to the environment as a human right in several jurisdictions revolutionised the approach towards environmental protection. Nevertheless, the right to the environment has an anthropogenic dimension, and this recognition could not mitigate the environmental crisis faced by the planet. In response to this increasing ecological crisis, the concept of recognising the rights to nature evolved. The Indian judiciary propounded the river Ganges and Yamuna; Glaciers, Gangotri, and Yamunotri as legal personalities and granted them the rights commensurate with that of a human being. This trend gained attention in Bangladesh, which gave all its rivers rights and legal personhood in 2019. Though the decisions followed the more prominent global trend, these decisions differ from the worldwide movement and their decisions in the articulation of rights and implementation. This paper critically evaluates the legal developments in the rights to nature jurisprudence in India and Bangladesh, focusing on the right to rivers. A critical understanding of the judicial developments is essential in analysing the potential of giving the rights of rivers in improving environmental protection strategies. Considering the impact of these judgments in the transboundary context, the paper looks into the impacts and implications of this recognition on transboundary river governance in India and Bangladesh. The article articulates an eco-centric approach as the starting point for evolving a global perspective in recognising the rights of rivers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生态中心视角下的印度和孟加拉国河流法律人格:平衡发展需求与环境保护
若干司法管辖区承认环境权是一项人权,这彻底改变了环境保护的做法。然而,环境权具有人为因素,这种认识不能减轻地球所面临的环境危机。为了应对日益严重的生态危机,承认自然权利的概念逐渐形成。印度司法部门提出恒河和亚穆纳河;冰川,甘戈特里和山野特里被赋予法律人格并赋予他们与人类同等的权利。这一趋势引起了孟加拉国的关注,该国于2019年赋予所有河流权利和法人资格。虽然这些决定遵循了更突出的全球趋势,但这些决定与世界范围的运动及其在权利表达和执行方面的决定不同。本文批判性地评估了印度和孟加拉国自然权利法理学的法律发展,重点是河流权。在分析赋予河流权利在改善环境保护战略方面的潜力时,对司法发展的批判性理解至关重要。考虑到这些判决在跨界背景下的影响,本文研究了这一承认对印度和孟加拉国跨界河流治理的影响和含义。这篇文章阐明了以生态为中心的方法,作为在承认河流权利方面发展全球视角的起点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
6
期刊最新文献
Climate Litigation in a ‘Developmental State’: The Case of China Note from the Co-editors The Right to a Life-Sustaining Climate System: Selected Case Law Climate Litigation: Targeting the Aviation Sector The 2023 Amazon Summit – Regional and Global Relevance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1