An action-reaction cycle in the Sino-Indian rivalry?

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q3 AREA STUDIES India Review Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1080/14736489.2023.2201537
C. Colley
{"title":"An action-reaction cycle in the Sino-Indian rivalry?","authors":"C. Colley","doi":"10.1080/14736489.2023.2201537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Sino-Indian rivalry traces its origins to the founding of each state in the late 1940s. Over the past decade Indian concerns over Chinese activities in South Asia have significantly increased. While New Delhi has sought to counter Beijing in South Asia, a key question is to what extent has China responded to India in the same region? Do we find evidence of a tit-for-tat rivalry escalation process in South Asia where both China and India are actively trying to counter each other? The central argument in this article is that China is not actively engaging in a direct form of rivalry reciprocity with India. While certain activities by Beijing in the region are designed to enhance Chinese influence and power, there is less evidence that these are a direct response to India. This is in contrast to New Delhi’s behavior in the region where we do find evidence of Indian leaders directly responding to China. This articles’ main contribution is to demonstrate that maintenance in asymmetrical positional rivalries does not require clearly identifiable points of escalation, or follow a linear path of a tit-for-tat action-reaction cycle.","PeriodicalId":56338,"journal":{"name":"India Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"249 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"India Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14736489.2023.2201537","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Sino-Indian rivalry traces its origins to the founding of each state in the late 1940s. Over the past decade Indian concerns over Chinese activities in South Asia have significantly increased. While New Delhi has sought to counter Beijing in South Asia, a key question is to what extent has China responded to India in the same region? Do we find evidence of a tit-for-tat rivalry escalation process in South Asia where both China and India are actively trying to counter each other? The central argument in this article is that China is not actively engaging in a direct form of rivalry reciprocity with India. While certain activities by Beijing in the region are designed to enhance Chinese influence and power, there is less evidence that these are a direct response to India. This is in contrast to New Delhi’s behavior in the region where we do find evidence of Indian leaders directly responding to China. This articles’ main contribution is to demonstrate that maintenance in asymmetrical positional rivalries does not require clearly identifiable points of escalation, or follow a linear path of a tit-for-tat action-reaction cycle.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中印竞争中的行动-反应循环?
中印之间的竞争可以追溯到20世纪40年代末两国的建国。过去10年,印度对中国在南亚活动的担忧显著增加。虽然新德里试图在南亚对抗北京,但一个关键问题是,中国在同一地区对印度的回应程度如何?在南亚地区,我们是否发现了针锋相对的竞争升级过程,中国和印度都在积极地试图对抗对方?本文的中心论点是,中国并没有积极地与印度进行直接的竞争互惠。尽管北京在该地区的某些活动旨在增强中国的影响力和实力,但很少有证据表明,这些活动是对印度的直接回应。这与新德里在该地区的行为形成鲜明对比,我们确实发现了印度领导人直接回应中国的证据。本文的主要贡献在于证明,在不对称的位置竞争中维持不需要明确可识别的升级点,也不需要遵循针锋相对的行动-反应循环的线性路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
India Review
India Review AREA STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
The paradoxes of Vietnam’s ties to India Theories of governance and development: How does India’s experience fit? Rising to the challenge: a systematic review of development of environmental justice in India Faultlines and stultification: contemporary currents in India and Pakistan Living in a fragmented world: India’s data way
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1