Physical Activity in Staff: Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Self-efficacy

S. Yarmohammadi, Z. Rezaei, H. Yarmohammadi, V. Ranaei, T. Marashi
{"title":"Physical Activity in Staff: Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Self-efficacy","authors":"S. Yarmohammadi, Z. Rezaei, H. Yarmohammadi, V. Ranaei, T. Marashi","doi":"10.32598/ahs.10.4.281.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims of the Study: A major factor affecting health is regular physical activity. Physical activity reduces the risk of infectious diseases. The current study aimed to investigate the Perceived benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy of physical activity of the administrative staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2018. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, a sample of 300 employees of the administrative staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran City, Iran, was selected by a convenience sampling method. The study variables included demographic information, perceived benefits and barriers, and self-efficacy physical activity. SPSS v. 16 was used to analyze the obtained data using the Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal- Wallis test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The collected results indicated a significant relationship between personal (P<0.03) and interpersonal (P<0.001) benefits and gender. Moreover, among the barriers, only environmental barriers had a significant relationship with gender (P<0.03). A significant association was observed between benefits and barriers and self-efficacy (P<0.01). The most common (environmental) barriers were the lack of sports space for men (51.6%) and women (62.9%), and being away from sports spaces for men (41.5%) and women (49.4%); the (personal) barriers were time-consuming for men (38.5%), women (43%). The most common benefits were better sleep for men (96.9%) and improved appearance for women (95.3%). The most general self-efficacy was exercising alone in men (61.5%) and women (56.5%). Conclusion: The staff expressed common barriers to physical activity. These barriers should be considered in designing health care policies and interventions such as providing sports facilities to promote physical activity.","PeriodicalId":8299,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Hygiene Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Hygiene Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/ahs.10.4.281.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims of the Study: A major factor affecting health is regular physical activity. Physical activity reduces the risk of infectious diseases. The current study aimed to investigate the Perceived benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy of physical activity of the administrative staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in 2018. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, a sample of 300 employees of the administrative staff of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences in Tehran City, Iran, was selected by a convenience sampling method. The study variables included demographic information, perceived benefits and barriers, and self-efficacy physical activity. SPSS v. 16 was used to analyze the obtained data using the Chi-squared test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal- Wallis test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. Results: The collected results indicated a significant relationship between personal (P<0.03) and interpersonal (P<0.001) benefits and gender. Moreover, among the barriers, only environmental barriers had a significant relationship with gender (P<0.03). A significant association was observed between benefits and barriers and self-efficacy (P<0.01). The most common (environmental) barriers were the lack of sports space for men (51.6%) and women (62.9%), and being away from sports spaces for men (41.5%) and women (49.4%); the (personal) barriers were time-consuming for men (38.5%), women (43%). The most common benefits were better sleep for men (96.9%) and improved appearance for women (95.3%). The most general self-efficacy was exercising alone in men (61.5%) and women (56.5%). Conclusion: The staff expressed common barriers to physical activity. These barriers should be considered in designing health care policies and interventions such as providing sports facilities to promote physical activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
员工的体育活动:感知的好处、障碍和自我效能
研究背景和目的:影响健康的一个主要因素是有规律的体育活动。体育活动可以降低患传染病的风险。本研究旨在调查2018年沙希德·贝赫什蒂医学科学大学行政人员对体育活动的感知益处、障碍和自我效能。材料和方法:在这项描述性分析研究中,采用方便抽样法对伊朗德黑兰市Shahid Beheshti医学科学大学的300名行政人员进行了抽样。研究变量包括人口统计信息、感知的益处和障碍以及自我效能感体育活动。SPSS v.16使用卡方检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验和Spearman相关系数对获得的数据进行分析。结果:收集的结果表明,个人(P<0.03)和人际(P<0.001)利益与性别之间存在显著关系。此外,在障碍中,只有环境障碍与性别有显著关系(P<0.03)。效益、障碍和自我效能感之间有显著关联(P<0.01)。最常见的(环境)障碍是男性(51.6%)和女性(62.9%)缺乏运动空间,男性(41.5%)和妇女(49.4%)远离运动空间;(个人)障碍对男性(38.5%)和女性(43%)来说是耗时的。最常见的益处是男性(96.9%)睡眠更好,女性(95.3%)外表更好。最普遍的自我效能感是男性(61.5%)和女性(56.5%)单独锻炼f表达了身体活动的常见障碍。在设计医疗保健政策和干预措施时,应考虑到这些障碍,例如提供体育设施以促进体育活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊最新文献
Investigating Response Priorities in Oil Pollution Emergencies in an Unloading and Loading Dock Using McKinsey’s 7s Gap Analysis Method Investigation of Antioxidant and Antibacterial Effect of Chemical Compounds Cardamine uliginosa Plant Macroscopic and Microscopic Survey of Sarcocystis spp. Infection in Slaughtered Cattle and Sheep in Tabriz, Iran Relationship Between Severity of Multiple Sclerosis and Fear of Falling Mediated by Cognitive and Physical Factors Relationship between Job Stress and Burnout of Psychiatric Nurses: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1